Implementing Innovation on Commercial Building Projects in Australia

Since the 1950s, economic theory has highlighted the ‘central importance of technological progress for maintaining long-term, continuous increases in real national income per head’ (Hall 2003, 498). Empirical work since that time has reinforced the importance of innovation to industry growth and national economic welfare. Hence, innovation can be considered a key means of improving construction industry performance. Yet, a recent study of efficiency improvement in construction reminds us that the industry has yet to embrace the value of innovation (Yiu et al 2004). That this is particularly so in the Australian context is evidenced by the findings of the recent Cole Royal Commission (2002b). The industry in Australia and globally is slow to embrace change and there are powerful cultural reasons why this is so. The reason addressed by this paper is concern by industry participants about the risks associated with innovation and lack of information about appropriate implementation strategies. In order to improve this situation the key players and dynamics behind successful implementation of innovation are explored here. The paper is based on three innovation case studies in the Australian commercial building industry undertaken in 2003. Each case involves innovation undertaken on a commercial building project by clients, contractors, consultants and/or suppliers. The paper reviews the industry’s performance in Australia, before outlining the methodology and conceptual framework. Data from the case studies is then described and analysed. The evidence presented points to four key participants driving innovation processes; clients, regulators, technical service providers and consultants.

[1]  A. Kleinknecht,et al.  Success and Failure of Innovation: A Literature Review , 2003 .

[2]  Ammon Salter,et al.  Learning and Innovation Management in Project-Based, Service-Enhanced Firms , 1998 .

[3]  Peter Hall,et al.  Innovation: principles, processes and policy. a review of the contribution of Prometheus in its first 20 years , 2003 .

[4]  Ammon Salter,et al.  Innovation and performance in engineering design , 2003 .

[5]  Mei-yung Leung,et al.  A longitudinal analysis on the relationship between construction output and GDP in Hong Kong , 2004 .

[6]  Lyndal Thorburn,et al.  Embracing Change: How Australian Firms Innovate to Support Growth , 2003 .

[7]  Karen Manley,et al.  Frameworks for Understanding Interactive Innovation Processes , 2003 .

[8]  Keith D. Hampson,et al.  Building and construction product system : public sector R&D , 1999 .

[9]  J. Turner,et al.  Farsighted project contract management: incomplete in its entirety , 2004 .

[10]  E. Sarah Slaughter,et al.  Models of Construction Innovation , 1998 .

[11]  E. Sarah Slaughter,et al.  Implementation of construction innovations , 2000 .

[12]  Donald Hislop,et al.  The client role in consultancy relations during the appropriation of technological innovations , 2002 .

[13]  Scott Fernie,et al.  Learning across business sectors: knowledge sharing between aerospace and construction , 2004 .

[14]  David Gann,et al.  Putting academic ideas into practice: technological progress and the absorptive capacity of construction organizations , 2001 .

[15]  Andrew R.J. Dainty,et al.  Client‐led strategies for construction supply chain improvement , 2004 .

[16]  Karen Manley,et al.  Key influences on construction innovation , 2004 .

[17]  Aviv Shoham,et al.  Innovation in the public sector , 2021, Innovation in the Public Sector.

[18]  Florence Yean Yng Ling,et al.  Managing the implementation of construction innovations , 2003 .

[19]  Graham Winch,et al.  Zephyrs of creative destruction: understanding the management of innovation in construction , 1998 .

[20]  R. Nelson The market economy, and the scientific commons , 2004 .

[21]  David Gann,et al.  Do regulations encourage innovation? The case of energy efficiency in housing. , 1998 .