The importance of hand use to discharge of interpositus neurones of the monkey.

1. Monkey interpositus neurones show large discharge modulations during reaching to grasp, however, the same neurones show little or no modulation during operation of devices that exercise individual forelimb joints. We tested the hypothesis that grasping during the reach‐to‐grasp is necessary for eliciting high discharge modulation. 2. Three monkeys (Macaca mulatta) moved an articulated lever between low and high target zones. While in the lower zone the monkey's hand was at its waist, in the upper zone its hand was in a position that required forelimb extension at right‐angles to the body axis. Small drawers adjacent to the target zones contained raisins, and the drawers could be remotely opened. Thus, we could elicit two types of reaches having similar trajectories: one reach involved limb transport while holding the lever handle, and the other involved limb transport while forming the hand to grasp a raisin. 3. Eighty‐one neurones from two monkeys, mostly from interpositus with some from adjacent regions of dentate, were tested during device use and reaching to grasp: 93% of the neurones discharged at high rates during at least one of the tasks. Of these, about half increased discharge rate solely during reaching to grasp; the other half showed some increase during device use but only discharged strongly during reaching to grasp. Overall, discharge modulations during the reach‐to‐grasp averaged twice as high as during the corresponding device movement (112 versus 56 impulses s‐1). 4. Individual neurones consistently discharged with characteristic patterns during the reach‐to‐grasp with rates often exceeding 300 impulses s‐1. Discharge during the reach‐to‐grasp was independent of reach trajectory: discharge patterns and amplitudes were similar when reaching from either the lower or upper target zone to the upper raisin drawer as when reaching from the upper target zone to the upper raisin drawer. Reach direction also made little difference: reaches from the upper target zone to the lower drawer typically elicited similar discharge modulation as those from the lower target zone to the upper drawer. 5. High discharge rates associated with grasping were independent of the item being grasped: typically, grasping the device handle elicited as high discharge rates as grasping a raisin. 6. The hypothesis was confirmed that grasping is critical for eliciting high discharge modulation in interpositus during reaching to grasp. Discharge pattern and modulation do not vary with reach direction or amplitude of the reach and, therefore, it is unlikely that intermediate cerebellum controls these features of the reach‐to‐grasp.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

[1]  G. Holstege,et al.  Ultrastructural evidence for direct monosynaptic rubrospinal connections to motoneurons in Macaca mulatta , 1988, Neuroscience Letters.

[2]  J. Houk,et al.  Relation between red nucleus discharge and movement parameters in trained macaque monkeys. , 1985, The Journal of physiology.

[3]  J. Houk,et al.  Magnocellular red nucleus activity during different types of limb movement in the macaque monkey. , 1985, The Journal of physiology.

[4]  J. Houk,et al.  Output organization of intermediate cerebellum of the monkey. , 1993, Journal of neurophysiology.

[5]  A. Arnold,et al.  Spinal branching of rubrospinal axons in the cat , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[6]  E. Sybirska,et al.  Effects of red nucleus lesions on forelimb movements in the cat. , 1980, Acta neurobiologiae experimentalis.

[7]  P. Cheney,et al.  Facilitation and suppression of wrist and digit muscles from single rubromotoneuronal cells in the awake monkey. , 1991, Journal of neurophysiology.

[8]  T Sinkjaer,et al.  Correlation of primate red nucleus discharge with muscle activity during free‐form arm movements. , 1993, The Journal of physiology.

[9]  O. Pompeiano,et al.  Experimental demonstration of a somatotopical origin of rubrospinal fibers in the cat , 1957, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[10]  W. Mackay,et al.  Unit activity in the cerebellar nuclei related to arm reaching movements , 1988, Brain Research.

[11]  G. Holmes.  THE CEREBELLUM OF MAN , 1939 .

[12]  Marc H. Schieber,et al.  Cerebellar Output: Body Maps and Muscle Spindles , 1982 .

[13]  A. Brodal,et al.  SITES AND MODE OF TERMINATION OF RUBROSPINAL FIBRES IN THE CAT. AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY WITH SILVER IMPREGNATION METHODS. , 1964, Journal of anatomy.

[14]  R. Porter,et al.  Discharges of intracerebellar nuclear cells in monkeys. , 1979, The Journal of physiology.

[15]  D. G. Lawrence,et al.  The functional organization of the motor system in the monkey. II. The effects of lesions of the descending brain-stem pathways. , 1968, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[16]  J. Houk,et al.  Selective projections from the cat red nucleus to digit motor neurons , 1987, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[17]  J. Houk,et al.  Activity of primate magnocellular red nucleus related to hand and finger movements , 1988, Behavioural Brain Research.

[18]  D. Humphrey,et al.  Cells of origin of corticorubral projections from the arm area of primate motor cortex and their synaptic actions in the red nucleus , 1976, Brain Research.

[19]  G. Holstege,et al.  The anatomy of brain stem pathways to the spinal cord in cat. A labeled amino acid tracing study. , 1982, Progress in brain research.

[20]  J. Houk,et al.  Functional and anatomic differentiation between parvicellular and magnocellular regions of red nucleus in the monkey , 1986, Brain Research.

[21]  P. Flourens.  Recherches expérimentales sur les propriétés et les fonctions du système nerveux dans les animaux vertébrés , 1842 .

[22]  G. Holstege,et al.  Anatomical evidence for red nucleus projections to motoneuronal cell groups in the spinal cord of the monkey , 1988, Neuroscience Letters.

[23]  J. Houk,et al.  Limb specific connections of the cat magnocellular red nucleus , 1987, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[24]  J. Kalaska,et al.  Cerebellar neuronal activity related to whole-arm reaching movements in the monkey. , 1989, Journal of neurophysiology.

[25]  R. Porter,et al.  Relationship between the activity of precentral neurones during active and passive movements in conscious monkeys , 1976, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[26]  M. Jeannerod.  The formation of finger grip during prehension. A cortically mediated visuomotor pattern , 1986, Behavioural Brain Research.