Acoustic seabed segmentation for echosounders through direct statistical clustering of seabed echoes

Abstract A new method is presented for inferring seabed type from the properties of seabed echoes stimulated by echosounders. The methodology currently used classifies echoes indirectly through feature extraction, usually in conjunction with dimensional reduction techniques such as Principal Components Analysis. The features or principal components derived from them are classified by statistical clustering or other means into groups with similar sets of mathematical properties. However, a simpler technique is to directly cluster the echoes themselves. A priori modelling or curve fitting, feature extraction, and dimensional reduction are not required, simplifying the processing and analysis chain, and eliminating data distortions. In effect the echoes are treated as geometrical entities, which are classified by their shapes and positions. Direct clustering places the analysis focus on the actual echoes, not on proxy parameters or mathematical techniques. This allows simple and direct evaluations of results, without the need to work in abstract mathematical spaces of unknown relation to echo properties. The direct clustering method for seabed echoes is demonstrated with echosounder data obtained in Balls Head Bay, Sydney Harbour, Australia, an area with mud, sand, and shell beds.

[1]  R. Lynn Kirlin,et al.  Blind deconvolution of echosounder envelopes , 1996, 1996 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing Conference Proceedings.

[2]  Iain Parnum,et al.  Acoustic seabed segmentation from direct statistical clustering of entire multibeam sonar backscatter curves , 2011 .

[3]  L. Hamilton Comment on: “Orpin, A.R. and Kostylev, V.E., 2006. Towards a statistically valid method of textural sea floor characterization of benthic habitats [Mar. Geol. 225 (1–4), 209–222.]” , 2006 .

[4]  L. Hamilton,et al.  Comparison of RoxAnn and QTC-View acoustic bottom classification system performance for the Cairns area, Great Barrier Reef, Australia , 1999 .

[5]  P. Legendre,et al.  The use of video surveys, a Geographic Information System and sonar backscatter data to study faunal community dynamics at Juan de Fruca Ridge hydrothermal vents , 2002 .

[6]  J. Tegowski Acoustical classification of the bottom sediments in the southern Baltic Sea , 2005 .

[7]  P. V. Walree,et al.  Acoustic seafloor discrimination with echo shape parameters: A comparison with the ground truth , 2005 .

[8]  C. D. de Moustier,et al.  Remote sensing of sediment characteristics by optimized echo-envelope matching. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  P. Blondel,et al.  Boundary influences In high frequency, shallow water acoustics , 2005 .

[10]  L. Hamilton Clustering of cumulative grainsize distribution curves for shallow-marine samples with software program CLARA , 2007 .

[11]  J. M. Preston,et al.  Automated acoustic seabed classification of multibeam images of Stanton Banks , 2009 .

[12]  Peter J. Rousseeuw,et al.  Finding Groups in Data: An Introduction to Cluster Analysis , 1990 .

[13]  Richard Bellman,et al.  Adaptive Control Processes: A Guided Tour , 1961, The Mathematical Gazette.

[14]  X. Lurton,et al.  Automated Sea-bed Classification System For Echo-Sounders , 1992, OCEANS 92 Proceedings@m_Mastering the Oceans Through Technology.

[15]  L. Hamilton Characterising spectral sea wave conditions with statistical clustering of actual spectra , 2010 .

[16]  L. J. Hamilton,et al.  Acoustic Seabed Classification Systems , 2001 .

[17]  Alan R. Orpin,et al.  Towards a statistically valid method of textural sea floor characterization of benthic habitats , 2006 .