Supports for Digital Science Games: Visualizing and Mapping Analogies

More than 10 years ago, our team—consisting of instructional designers, game developers, science education experts, and researchers—began work on a set of four digital science games and instructional materials for middle-school educators. Collectively called Possible Worlds, with funding from the US Department of Education’s Institute of Education Sciences (Award # R305C080022), and later the National Science Foundation (DRL-1252382), we were motivated by the desire to provide teachers with engaging and easy-to-use resources to help students overcome persistent science misconceptions and gain a deeper understanding of abstract science concepts that can be difficult to visualize. For example, students often struggle to understand the concept that a solid material like plant matter can be made from a liquid (water) and a gas (carbon dioxide). Students (and adults) who cannot imagine processes that take place at the molecular level are likely to hold the misconception that plants “eat” a solid material such as soil and transform that into plant matter, another solid material.

[1]  D. Gentner Structure‐Mapping: A Theoretical Framework for Analogy* , 1983 .

[2]  Ellen B. Mandinach,et al.  A Retrospective on Twenty Years of Education Technology Policy , 2005 .

[3]  James Paul Gee,et al.  What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy , 2007, CIE.

[4]  K. Holyoak,et al.  Cognitive Supports for Analogies in the Mathematics Classroom , 2007, Science.

[5]  Roy D. Pea,et al.  Addressing the Challenges of Inquiry-Based Learning Through Technology and Curriculum Design , 1999 .

[6]  Esra Özay,et al.  Secondary students' interpretations of photosynthesis and plant nutrition , 2003 .

[7]  D. Gentner,et al.  Structure mapping in analogy and similarity. , 1997 .

[8]  D. Ketelhut The Impact of Student Self-efficacy on Scientific Inquiry Skills: An Exploratory Investigation in River City, a Multi-user Virtual Environment , 2007 .

[9]  D. Gentner,et al.  Learning and Transfer: A General Role for Analogical Encoding , 2003 .

[10]  Bryan J. Matlen,et al.  Analogical Reasoning in the Classroom: Insights from Cognitive Science. , 2015 .

[11]  Wendy Martin,et al.  Testing the Impact of a Pre-instructional Digital Game on Middle-Grade Students’ Understanding of Photosynthesis , 2015, Technol. Knowl. Learn..

[12]  S. Barab,et al.  Relating Narrative, Inquiry, and Inscriptions: Supporting Consequential Play , 2007 .

[13]  K. Squire From Content to Context: Videogames as Designed Experience , 2006 .

[14]  J. Roschelle,et al.  Misconceptions Reconceived: A Constructivist Analysis of Knowledge in Transition , 1994 .

[15]  Brian C. Nelson,et al.  SURGE’s Evolution Deeper into Formal Representations: The Siren’s Call of Popular Game-Play Mechanics , 2016 .

[16]  Dedre Gentner,et al.  Bootstrapping the Mind: Analogical Processes and Symbol Systems , 2010, Cogn. Sci..

[17]  Nina K Simms,et al.  Analogy, higher order thinking, and education. , 2015, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science.

[18]  M. Honey,et al.  Perspectives on Technology and Education Research: Lessons from the Past and Present , 2000 .

[19]  E. Soloway,et al.  Creating Usable Innovations in Systemic Reform: Scaling Up Technology-Embedded Project-Based Science in Urban Schools , 2000 .

[20]  Wendy Martin,et al.  Digital games as sources for science analogies: Learning about energy through play , 2019, Comput. Educ..

[21]  R. Driver,et al.  Making Sense of Secondary Science: Research into children’s ideas , 1993 .