Sensory changes after traditional and ultrasound-assisted liposuction using computer-assisted analysis.

Postoperative sensory changes (i.e., hypesthesias) that occur after suction-assisted lipoplasty (SAL) are expected clinical sequelae. These disturbances usually return to normal within several weeks to months postoperatively. The presumed mechanism of injury is direct trauma to the peripheral nerves from the suction cannula. In addition, the potential for demyelination of peripheral nerves secondary to cavitation during ultrasound-assisted liposuction (UAL) is well known. Quantitative data describing hypesthesia after both procedures are limited. The purpose of this study was to objectively evaluate the severity and duration of postoperative hypesthesia after liposuction to better educate patients preoperatively. Furthermore, the authors use the three-stage UAL technique and wanted to determine whether a clinical difference in sensory return existed between suction- and ultrasound-treated areas. A total of 21 patients underwent liposuction performed by the senior author (RJ.R.). The abdomen, flanks, thighs, and medial knees were tested for objective sensation with the Pressure Specified Sensory Device preoperatively and at 2, 6, and 10 weeks postoperatively. A total of 102 sites were tested. On average, the SAL-treated areas improved to normal sensation by 6 weeks, whereas the UAL-treated areas took, on average, 10 weeks to recover. The severity of the hypesthesia was not correlated with larger aspiration volumes or longer UAL exposure time per site. At 10 weeks, 90 percent of UAL-treated patients and 89 percent of liposuction patients overall had recovered normal sensation. This study provides the body-contouring surgeon with good, objective data with which to educate patients regarding sensory return after liposuction.

[1]  Rod J. Rohrich,et al.  The effects of ultrasonic energy on peripheral nerves: implications for ultrasound-assisted liposuction. , 1999, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[2]  P. Fodor,et al.  Personal experience with ultrasound-assisted lipoplasty: a pilot study comparing ultrasound-assisted lipoplasty with traditional lipoplasty. , 2004, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[3]  L. Perry,et al.  Tissue temperatures during ultrasound-assisted lipoplasty. , 1998, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[4]  Rod J. Rohrich,et al.  Extending the role of liposuction in body contouring with ultrasound-assisted liposuction. , 1998, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[5]  Maxwell Gp,et al.  Ultrasound-assisted lipoplasty: a clinical study of 250 consecutive patients. , 1998 .

[6]  M. Topaz Possible long-term complications in ultrasound-assisted lipoplasty induced by sonoluminescence, sonochemistry, and thermal effect. , 1998, Aesthetic surgery journal.

[7]  Rod J. Rohrich,et al.  The role of subcutaneous infiltration in suction-assisted lipoplasty: a review. , 1997, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[8]  M. Scheflan,et al.  Ultrasonically Assisted Body Contouring , 1996 .

[9]  A. Dellon,et al.  Correlation of Measurements of Pressure Perception Using the Pressure‐specified Sensory Device with Electrodiagnostic Testing , 1995, Journal of occupational and environmental medicine.

[10]  L. Håheim,et al.  Long‐Term Results of Blunt Suction Lipectomy Assessed by a Patient Questionnaire Survey , 1993, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[11]  M. Zocchi Clinical Aspects of Ultrasonic Liposculpture , 1993 .

[12]  E. Dellon,et al.  Comparison of the Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments with the Pressure-Specifying Sensory Device. , 1993, Restorative neurology and neuroscience.

[13]  A L Dellon,et al.  Human pressure perception values for constant and moving one- and two-point discrimination. , 1992, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[14]  Krishna Shankara Narayanan,et al.  The Use of High-Frequency Ultrasound for the Dissection of Small-Diameter Blood Vessels and Nerves , 1992, Annals of plastic surgery.

[15]  H. Takita,et al.  Ultrasonic surgical aspirator for lung resection. , 1991, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[16]  M. Donelan,et al.  Skin Sensation after Suction Lipectomy: A Prospective Study of 50 Consecutive Patients , 1988, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[17]  Mark H Ellisman,et al.  Diagnostic levels of ultrasound may disrupt myelination , 1987, Experimental Neurology.

[18]  U. Fisch,et al.  A morphological study of the effect of the Cavitron ultrasonic surgical aspirator system near human peripheral nerves. , 1987, Archives of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery.

[19]  M. Gleeson,et al.  The cavitron ultrasonic surgical aspirator system. An anatomical and physiological study of the effect of its use on the rat facial nerve. , 1986, Clinical otolaryngology and allied sciences.

[20]  E. H. Courtiss Suction Lipectomy of the Neck , 1985, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[21]  P. Cooper,et al.  Radical resection of intramedullary spinal cord tumors in adults. Recent experience in 29 patients. , 1985, Journal of neurosurgery.

[22]  G. Pitman,et al.  Suction lipectomy: complications and results by survey. , 1985, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[23]  E. H. Courtiss,et al.  The risks of suction lipectomy. Their prevention and treatment. , 1984, Clinics in plastic surgery.

[24]  A. Aufses,et al.  Mucosal proctectomy using an ultrasonic scalpel. , 1984, American journal of surgery.

[25]  I. L. Richmond,et al.  Evaluation of the histopathology of brain tumor tissue obtained by ultrasonic aspiration. , 1983, Neurosurgery.

[26]  W. Young,et al.  Acute physiological effects of ultrasonic vibrations on nervous tissue. , 1981, Neurosurgery.

[27]  E. Flamm,et al.  Preliminary experience with ultrasonic aspiration in neurosurgery. , 1978, Neurosurgery.