Facilitating Debate in Networked Learning: Reflecting on Online Synchronous Discussion in Higher Education.

Small-group collaborative learning in which students have opportunity for critical discussion is a key element of effective teaching and learning in Higher Education. Providing this sort of education through Networked Learning (NL) is challenging. Research in Computer Mediated Communication (CMC) is revealing that facilitating effective use of these tools depends on encouraging students to take many different dialog roles. Our hypothesis was that asking post-graduate students to reflect on the kinds of role they should take in synchronous online discussion would encourage adoption of such roles. A ‘role-play’ activity was introduced to post-graduate students who used a Virtual Learning Environment (VLE) as part of their course. Initial results showed that both distance and face-to-face students, native speakers (NS) and non-native speakers (NNS), working collaboratively on the same course through the VLE, had comparable outcomes on essay assignments and that NNS and distance learners slightly outperformed face-to-face students in their group work. Moreover, there was evidence that the facilitation technique of raising student awareness of roles was effective in helping (at least some) students manage synchronous online discussion more effectively, improving the overall coherence, focus and depth of discussion.

[1]  D. Kuhn.  THE SKILLS OF ARGUMENT , 2008, Education for Thinking.

[2]  Moira Monteith.  ICT for Curriculum Enhancement , 2004 .

[3]  C. Kneser,et al.  The Tutor's Role: An investigation of the power of Exchange Structure Analysis to identify different roles in CMC seminars , 2001 .

[4]  Nancy Sullivan,et al.  A comparative study of two ESL writing environments: A computer-assisted classroom and a traditional oral classroom , 1996 .

[5]  Joan M. Fayer,et al.  Don't speak to me in English: Communication apprehension in Puerto Rico , 1985 .

[6]  Neil Mercer,et al.  Computers and Reasoning Through Talk in the Classroom , 1996 .

[7]  Rachel M. Pilkington,et al.  Helping the tutor facilitate debate to improve literacy using CMC , 2001, Proceedings IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies.

[8]  Rachel M. Pilkington,et al.  An Evaluation of Computer Mediated Communication to Support Group Discussion in Continuing Education , 2000, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[9]  M. Warschauer.  Comparing Face-To-Face and Electronic Discussion in the Second Language Classroom , 2013, CALICO Journal.

[10]  C. Crook.  Computers and the Collaborative Experience of Learning , 1996 .

[11]  Lina Lee,et al.  Synchronous online exchanges: a study of modification devices on non-native discourse , 2002 .

[12]  Christyne A. Berzsenyi.  Teaching interlocutor relationships in electronic classrooms , 1999 .

[13]  Martha C. Pennington,et al.  The Computer and the Non-Native Writer: A Natural Partnership , 1996 .

[14]  Dorothy M. Chun.  Using computer networking to facilitate the acquisition of interactive competence , 1994 .

[15]  Susan C. Herring.  Interactional Coherence in CMC , 1999, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[16]  Judy Robertson,et al.  BetterBlether: The Design and Evaluation of a Discussion Tool for education , 1998 .

[17]  Yili Li,et al.  Linguistic Characteristics of ESL Writing in Task-based E-mail Activities , 2000 .

[18]  Eva Ekeblad,et al.  Contact, Community and Multilogue. Electronic Communication in the Practice of Scholarship. , 1998 .

[19]  Michael J. Baker,et al.  Arguing to Learn: Confronting Cognitions in Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Environments , 2003 .

[20]  Ann M. Penrose,et al.  Hearing Ourselves Think: Cognitive Research in the College Writing Classroom. Social and Cognitive Studies in Writing and Literacy. , 1993 .

[21]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Learning Together and Alone , 1999 .

[22]  D. Harwood,et al.  The Pedagogy of the World Studies 8‐13 Project: the influence of the presence/absence of the teacher upon primary children's collaborative group work , 1995 .

[23]  Jerry Andriessen,et al.  Learning through synchronous electronic discussion , 2000, Comput. Educ..

[24]  Judith A. Muyskens,et al.  New Ways of Learning and Teaching: Focus on Technology and Foreign Language Education. Issues in Language Program Direction: A Series of Annual Volumes. , 1997 .

[25]  Rachel Pilkington,et al.  Using CMC to Develop Argumentation Skills in Childre with a ‘Literacy Deficit’ , 2003 .

[26]  C. Werry.  Linguistic and interactional features of Internet relay chat , 1996 .

[27]  N. Mercer,et al.  Children's Talk and the Development of Reasoning in the Classroom , 1999 .

[28]  S. Herring.  Computer-mediated communication : linguistic, social and cross-cultural perspectives , 1996 .

[29]  Rachel Pilkington,et al.  Reflecting on roles: using synchronous CMC to develop a knowledge-building community amongst postgraduates , 2003 .