On the use of liposome controls in studies investigating the clinical potential of extracellular vesicle-based drug delivery systems - A commentary.

The field of extracellular vesicle (EV)-based drug delivery systems has evolved significantly through the recent years, and numerous studies suggest that these endogenous nanoparticles can function as efficient drug delivery vehicles in a variety of diseases. Many characteristics of these EV-based drug delivery vehicles suggest them to be superior at residing in the systemic circulation and possibly at mediating therapeutic effects compared to synthetic drug delivery vehicles, e.g. liposomes. In this Commentary, we discuss how some currently published head-to-head comparisons of EVs versus liposomes are weakened by the inadequate choice of liposomal formulation, and encourage researchers to implement better controls to show any potential superiority of EVs over other synthetic nanoparticles.

[1]  Gary K. Schwartz,et al.  Tumour exosome integrins determine organotropic metastasis , 2015, Nature.

[2]  John W. Park Liposome-based drug delivery in breast cancer treatment , 2002, Breast Cancer Research.

[3]  Andrew Z. Wang,et al.  EPR or no EPR? The billion-dollar question , 2015, Science Translational Medicine.

[4]  H M Patel,et al.  Serum opsonins and phagocytosis of saturated and unsaturated phospholipid liposomes. , 1989, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[5]  L. O’Driscoll,et al.  Biological properties of extracellular vesicles and their physiological functions , 2015, Journal of extracellular vesicles.

[6]  Andreas Kjær,et al.  Positron Emission Tomography Based Elucidation of the Enhanced Permeability and Retention Effect in Dogs with Cancer Using Copper-64 Liposomes. , 2015, ACS nano.

[7]  Theresa M Allen,et al.  Advantages of liposomal delivery systems for anthracyclines. , 2004, Seminars in oncology.

[8]  Raghu Kalluri,et al.  Exosomes Facilitate Therapeutic Targeting of Oncogenic Kras in Pancreatic Cancer , 2017, Nature.

[9]  Meg Duroux,et al.  A comprehensive overview of exosomes as drug delivery vehicles - endogenous nanocarriers for targeted cancer therapy. , 2014, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[10]  M. Komiyama,et al.  Chemistry Can Make Strict and Fuzzy Controls for Bio-Systems: DNA Nanoarchitectonics and Cell-Macromolecular Nanoarchitectonics , 2017 .

[11]  C. Benz,et al.  Characterization of highly stable liposomal and immunoliposomal formulations of vincristine and vinblastine , 2009, Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology.

[12]  T. Anchordoquy,et al.  Biodistribution and delivery efficiency of unmodified tumor-derived exosomes. , 2015, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[13]  T. Moos,et al.  Revisiting nanoparticle technology for blood-brain barrier transport: Unfolding at the endothelial gate improves the fate of transferrin receptor-targeted liposomes. , 2016, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[14]  J. Gubernator,et al.  Active methods of drug loading into liposomes: recent strategies for stable drug entrapment and increased in vivo activity , 2011, Expert opinion on drug delivery.

[15]  I. Toth,et al.  Recent advances in self‐assembled peptides: Implications for targeted drug delivery and vaccine engineering , 2017, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[16]  Yuki Takahashi,et al.  Visualization and in vivo tracking of the exosomes of murine melanoma B16-BL6 cells in mice after intravenous injection. , 2013, Journal of biotechnology.

[17]  Koen Raemdonck,et al.  Therapeutic and diagnostic applications of extracellular vesicles. , 2016, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[18]  Maria Ericsson,et al.  Dynamic biodistribution of extracellular vesicles in vivo using a multimodal imaging reporter. , 2014, ACS nano.

[19]  T. Andresen,et al.  Targeting transferrin receptors at the blood-brain barrier improves the uptake of immunoliposomes and subsequent cargo transport into the brain parenchyma , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[20]  J. Kjems,et al.  DNA nanovehicles and the biological barriers. , 2016, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[21]  S M Moghimi,et al.  Factors controlling nanoparticle pharmacokinetics: an integrated analysis and perspective. , 2012, Annual review of pharmacology and toxicology.

[22]  Molly M Stevens,et al.  Active loading into extracellular vesicles significantly improves the cellular uptake and photodynamic effect of porphyrins. , 2015, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[23]  Juliane Nguyen,et al.  Exosomes as therapeutics: The implications of molecular composition and exosomal heterogeneity. , 2016, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[24]  F. Dosio,et al.  Stealth liposomes: review of the basic science, rationale, and clinical applications, existing and potential , 2006, International journal of nanomedicine.

[25]  Tianzhi Yang,et al.  Exosome Delivered Anticancer Drugs Across the Blood-Brain Barrier for Brain Cancer Therapy in Danio Rerio , 2014, Pharmaceutical Research.

[26]  P. Cullis,et al.  Liposomal drug delivery systems: from concept to clinical applications. , 2013, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[27]  T. Andresen,et al.  Remote Loading of (64)Cu(2+) into Liposomes without the Use of Ion Transport Enhancers. , 2015, ACS applied materials & interfaces.

[28]  R. Vandenbroucke,et al.  Comparing exosome-like vesicles with liposomes for the functional cellular delivery of small RNAs. , 2016, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[29]  Meg Duroux,et al.  Systematic review of factors influencing extracellular vesicle yield from cell cultures , 2016, Cytotechnology.

[30]  D. Hallahan,et al.  Tumor-targeted delivery of liposome-encapsulated doxorubicin by use of a peptide that selectively binds to irradiated tumors. , 2011, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[31]  M. Chopp,et al.  Systemic administration of cell-free exosomes generated by human bone marrow derived mesenchymal stem cells cultured under 2D and 3D conditions improves functional recovery in rats after traumatic brain injury , 2017, Neurochemistry International.

[32]  Samuel A Wickline,et al.  Maximizing exosome colloidal stability following electroporation. , 2014, Analytical biochemistry.

[33]  Wim E Hennink,et al.  Cancer nanomedicines: oversold or underappreciated? , 2017, Expert opinion on drug delivery.

[34]  Imre Mäger,et al.  Extracellular vesicle in vivo biodistribution is determined by cell source, route of administration and targeting , 2015, Journal of extracellular vesicles.

[35]  R. Schiffelers,et al.  PEGylated and targeted extracellular vesicles display enhanced cell specificity and circulation time. , 2016, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[36]  Thomas L Andresen,et al.  Liposomal cancer therapy: exploiting tumor characteristics , 2010, Expert opinion on drug delivery.

[37]  Michelle E. Hung,et al.  Stabilization of Exosome-targeting Peptides via Engineered Glycosylation* , 2015, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[38]  P. Cullis,et al.  Association of blood proteins with large unilamellar liposomes in vivo. Relation to circulation lifetimes. , 1992, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[39]  C. Théry,et al.  Proteomic comparison defines novel markers to characterize heterogeneous populations of extracellular vesicle subtypes , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[40]  Jaesung Park,et al.  Bioinspired exosome-mimetic nanovesicles for targeted delivery of chemotherapeutics to malignant tumors. , 2013, ACS nano.

[41]  S. Moghimi,et al.  Differential properties of organ-specific serum opsonins for liver and spleen macrophages. , 1989, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[42]  Thomas D. Schmittgen,et al.  Achieving the Promise of Therapeutic Extracellular Vesicles: The Devil is in Details of Therapeutic Loading , 2017, Pharmaceutical Research.

[43]  M. Zöller,et al.  Toward tailored exosomes: the exosomal tetraspanin web contributes to target cell selection. , 2012, The international journal of biochemistry & cell biology.

[44]  L. Gurevich,et al.  Evaluation of electroporation-induced adverse effects on adipose-derived stem cell exosomes , 2016, Cytotechnology.

[45]  Thomas D. Schmittgen,et al.  Low active loading of cargo into engineered extracellular vesicles results in inefficient miRNA mimic delivery , 2017, Journal of extracellular vesicles.

[46]  Fabian Kiessling,et al.  Cancer nanomedicine: Is targeting our target? , 2016, Nature reviews. Materials.

[47]  P. Kantoff,et al.  Cancer nanomedicine: progress, challenges and opportunities , 2016, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[48]  M. Zöller,et al.  Exosome target cell selection and the importance of exosomal tetraspanins: a hypothesis. , 2011, Biochemical Society transactions.

[49]  Ulrik B Nielsen,et al.  Anti-HER2 immunoliposomes: enhanced efficacy attributable to targeted delivery. , 2002, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.

[50]  K. Braeckmans,et al.  Electroporation-induced siRNA precipitation obscures the efficiency of siRNA loading into extracellular vesicles. , 2013, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[51]  A. J. Tavares,et al.  Analysis of nanoparticle delivery to tumours , 2016 .

[52]  Yechezkel Barenholz,et al.  Pharmacokinetics of Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin , 2003, Clinical pharmacokinetics.

[53]  J. Redzic,et al.  Examination of the specificity of tumor cell derived exosomes with tumor cells in vitro. , 2014, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[54]  M. Wood,et al.  Delivery of siRNA to the mouse brain by systemic injection of targeted exosomes , 2011, Nature Biotechnology.

[55]  J. Simonsen What Are We Looking At? Extracellular Vesicles, Lipoproteins, or Both? , 2017, Circulation research.