Shear wave splitting across the Iceland hot spot: Results from the ICEMELT experiment

[1] We report on observations of upper mantle anisotropy from the splitting of teleseismic shear waves (SKS, SKKS, and PKS) recorded by the ICEMELT broadband seismometer network in Iceland. In a ridge-centered hot spot locale, mantle anisotropy may be generated by flow-induced lattice-preferred orientation of olivine grains or the anisotropic distribution of magma. Splitting measurements of teleseismic shear waves may thus provide diagnostic information on upper mantle flow and/or the distribution of retained melt associated with the Iceland mantle plume. In eastern Iceland, fast polarization directions lie between N10� W and N45� W and average N24� W; delay times between the fast and slow shear waves are generally 0.7–1.35 s. In western Iceland, in contrast, the fast polarization directions, while less well constrained, yield an average value of N23� E and delay times are smaller (0.2–0.95 s). We propose that splitting in eastern Iceland is caused by a 100- to 200-km-thick anisotropic layer in the upper mantle. The observed fast directions in eastern Iceland, however, do not correspond either to the plate spreading direction or to a pattern of radial mantle flow from the center of the Iceland hot spot. We suggest that the relatively uniform direction and magnitude of splitting in eastern Iceland, situated on the Eurasian plate, may therefore reflect the large-scale flow field of the North Atlantic upper mantle. We hypothesize that the different pattern of anisotropy beneath western Iceland, part of the North American plate, is due to the different absolute motions of the two plates. By this view, splitting in eastern and western Iceland is the consequence of shear by North American and Eurasian plate motion relative to the background mantle flow. From absolute plate motion models, in which the Eurasian plate is approximately stationary and the North American plate is moving approximately westward, the splitting observations in both eastern and western Iceland can be satisfied by a background upper mantle flow in the direction N34� W and a velocity of 3 cm/yr in a hot spot reference frame. This inference can be used to test mantle flow models. In particular, it is inconsistent with kinematic flow models, which predict southward flow, or models where flow is dominated by subduction-related sources of mantle buoyancy, which predict westward flow. Our observations are more compatible with the flow field predicted from global seismic tomography models, which in particular include the influence of the large-scale lower mantle upwelling beneath southern Africa. While the hypothesized association between our observations and this upwelling is presently speculative, it makes a very specific and testable prediction about the flow field and hence anisotropy beneath the rest of the Atlantic basin. INDEX TERMS: 7218 Seismology: Lithosphere and upper mantle; 8120 Tectonophysics: Dynamics of lithosphere and mantle—general; 8155 Tectonophysics: Plate motions—general; KEYWORDS: Iceland, anisotropy, hot spot, plate motion, shear wave splitting, mantle flow

[1]  W. J. Morgan,et al.  Seismic evidence for a tilted mantle plume and north–south mantle flow beneath Iceland , 2002 .

[2]  P. Silver,et al.  The Mantle Flow Field Beneath Western North America , 2002, Science.

[3]  P. Silver,et al.  Calculating splitting parameters for plume-type anisotropic structures of the upper mantle , 2000 .

[4]  T. Ryberg,et al.  New “Fresnel‐Zone” estimates for shear‐wave splitting observations from finite‐difference modeling , 2000 .

[5]  M. Savage,et al.  Seismic anisotropy and mantle flow from the Great Basin to the Great Plains, western United States , 2000 .

[6]  B. Steinberger.  Slabs in the lower mantle — results of dynamic modelling compared with tomographic images and the geoid , 2000 .

[7]  W. Wilcock,et al.  The effect of local wind on seismic noise near 1 Hz at the MELT site and in iceland , 1999, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[8]  M. Savage.  Seismic anisotropy and mantle deformation: What have we learned from shear wave splitting? , 1999 .

[9]  C. Wolfe,et al.  Mantle flow, melting, and dehydration of the Iceland mantle plume , 1999 .

[10]  W. Menke,et al.  Compressional and shear velocity structure of the lithosphere in northern Iceland , 1998, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[11]  P. Silver,et al.  Apparent shear-wave splitting parameters in the presence of vertically varying anisotropy , 1998 .

[12]  R. White,et al.  Crustal structure above the Iceland mantle plume imaged by the ICEMELT refraction profile , 1998 .

[13]  W. B. Ismail,et al.  An olivine fabric database: an overview of upper mantle fabrics and seismic anisotropy , 1998 .

[14]  P. Silver,et al.  Dynamic topography, plate driving forces and the African superswell , 1998, Nature.

[15]  S. Solomon,et al.  Seismic evidence for a lower-mantle origin of the Iceland plume , 1998, Nature.

[16]  Wolfe,et al.  Shear-wave splitting and implications for mantle flow beneath the MELT region of the east pacific rise , 1998, Science.

[17]  J. Montagner,et al.  Anisotropic tomography of the Atlantic Ocean from Rayleigh surface waves , 1998 .

[18]  M. Richards,et al.  The dynamics of Cenozoic and Mesozoic plate motions , 1998 .

[19]  Paul G. Silver,et al.  Seismic anisotropy of oceanic upper mantle: Shear wave splitting methodologies and observations , 1998 .

[20]  W. Menke,et al.  Färoe‐Iceland Ridge Experiment 1. Crustal structure of northeastern Iceland , 1997 .

[21]  J. Kendall,et al.  Sensitivity of teleseismic body waves to mineral texture and melt in the mantle beneath a mid–ocean ridge , 1997, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[22]  S. Solomon,et al.  Hot mantle transition zone beneath Iceland and the adjacent Mid-Atlantic Ridge inferred from P-to-S , 1996 .

[23]  P. Dawson,et al.  Teleseismic imaging of subaxial flow at mid-ocean ridges: traveltime effects of anisotropic mineral texture in the mantle , 1996 .

[24]  C. Gable,et al.  Dynamics of mantle flow and melting at a ridge-centered hotspot: Iceland and the Mid-Atlantic Ridge , 1996 .

[25]  P. Silver.  SEISMIC ANISOTROPY BENEATH THE CONTINENTS: Probing the Depths of Geology , 1996 .

[26]  S. Solomon,et al.  Initial results from the ICEMELT Experiment: Body‐wave delay times and shear‐wave splitting across Iceland , 1996 .

[27]  J. Smallwood,et al.  The temperature of the Iceland plume and origin of outward-propagating V-shaped ridges , 1995, Journal of the Geological Society.

[28]  J. Theissing,et al.  The dynamics of plume-ridge interaction, 1: Ridge-centered plumes , 1995 .

[29]  S. Karato,et al.  Lattice preferred orientation of olivine aggregates deformed in simple shear , 1995, Nature.

[30]  W. Menke,et al.  Seismic Anisotropy In the Crust At the Mid-Atlantic Plate Boundary In South-West Iceland , 1994 .

[31]  P. Silver,et al.  The Interpretation of Shear‐Wave Splitting Parameters In the Presence of Two Anisotropic Layers , 1994 .

[32]  Xiaoping Yang,et al.  Constraints on North Atlantic upper mantle anisotropy from S and SS phases , 1994 .

[33]  J. Kendall.  Teleseismic arrivals at a mid‐ocean ridge: Effects of mantle melt and anisotropy , 1994 .

[34]  M. Richards,et al.  A geodynamic model of mantle density heterogeneity , 1993 .

[35]  W. Menke,et al.  Tomographic image of the Mid‐Atlantic Plate Boundary in southwestern Iceland , 1993 .

[36]  S. Solomon,et al.  Joint inversion of shear wave travel time residuals and geoid and depth anomalies for long‐wavelength variations in upper mantle temperature and composition along the Mid‐Atlantic Ridge , 1991 .

[37]  Jean-Paul Montagner,et al.  Global upper mantle tomography of seismic velocities and anisotropies , 1991 .

[38]  Paul G. Silver,et al.  Shear wave splitting and subcontinental mantle deformation , 1991 .

[39]  J. Schilling.  Fluxes and excess temperatures of mantle plumes inferred from their interaction with migrating mid-ocean ridges , 1991, Nature.

[40]  Robert L. Woodward,et al.  Global upper mantle structure from long-period differential travel times , 1991 .

[41]  R. Gordon,et al.  Current plate velocities relative to the hotspots incorporating the NUVEL-1 global plate motion model , 1990 .

[42]  Norman H. Sleep,et al.  Hotspots and Mantle Plumes' Some Phenomenology , 1990 .

[43]  T. Tanimoto,et al.  Global anisotropy in the upper mantle inferred from the regionalization of phase velocities , 1990 .

[44]  B. Romanowicz,et al.  AZIMUTHAL ANISOTROPY IN THE EARTH FROM OBSERVATIONS OF SKS AT GEOSCOPE AND NARS BROADBAND STATIONS , 1989 .

[45]  D. Forsyth,et al.  Rayleigh wave phase velocities in the Pacific with implications for azimuthal anisotropy and lateral heterogeneities , 1988 .

[46]  Paul G. Silver,et al.  Implications for continental structure and evolution from seismic anisotropy , 1988, Nature.

[47]  M. Wysession,et al.  Lateral heterogeneity and azimuthal anisotropy in the North Atlantic determined from SS‐S differential travel times , 1987 .

[48]  G. Sigvaldason,et al.  Iceland geochemical anomaly: Origin, volcanotectonics, chemical fractionation and isotope evolution of the crust , 1985 .

[49]  I. Sacks,et al.  Deep structure of the Iceland Plateau , 1979 .

[50]  J. Oliver,et al.  A study of shallow global mantle flow due to the accretion and subduction of lithospheric plates , 1979 .

[51]  B. Hager,et al.  Kinematic models of large‐scale flow in the Earth's mantle , 1979 .

[52]  G. Pálmason,et al.  Iceland in Relation to the Mid-Atlantic Ridge , 1974 .

[53]  J. Schilling.  Iceland Mantle Plume: Geochemical Study of Reykjanes Ridge , 1973, Nature.

[54]  P. R. Vogt,et al.  Asthenosphere motion recorded by the ocean floor south of Iceland , 1971 .

[55]  T. Francis,et al.  Anisotropy of the Pacific upper mantle , 1969 .

[56]  T. Francis.  Generation of Seismic Anisotropy in the Upper Mantle along the Mid-Oceanic Ridges , 1969, Nature.

[57]  Sean C. Solomon,et al.  Seismic structure of the Iceland mantle plume , 1997, Nature.

[58]  Robert W. Clayton,et al.  Constraints on the Structure of Mantle Convection Using Seismic Observations, Flow Models, and the Geoid , 1989 .

[59]  N. Christensen,et al.  The magnitude, symmetry and origin of upper mantle anisotropy based on fabric analyses of ultramafic tectonites , 1984 .

[60]  C. G. Chase.  Asthenospheric counterflow: a kinematic model , 1979 .