Computerized mass detection in whole breast ultrasound images: reduction of false positives using bilateral subtraction technique

The comparison of left and right mammograms is a common technique used by radiologists for the detection and diagnosis of masses. In mammography, computer-aided detection (CAD) schemes using bilateral subtraction technique have been reported. However, in breast ultrasonography, there are no reports on CAD schemes using comparison of left and right breasts. In this study, we propose a scheme of false positive reduction based on bilateral subtraction technique in whole breast ultrasound images. Mass candidate regions are detected by using the information of edge directions. Bilateral breast images are registered with reference to the nipple positions and skin lines. A false positive region is detected based on a comparison of the average gray values of a mass candidate region and a region with the same position and same size as the candidate region in the contralateral breast. In evaluating the effectiveness of the false positive reduction method, three normal and three abnormal bilateral pairs of whole breast images were employed. These abnormal breasts included six masses larger than 5 mm in diameter. The sensitivity was 83% (5/6) with 13.8 (165/12) false positives per breast before applying the proposed reduction method. By applying the method, false positives were reduced to 4.5 (54/12) per breast without removing a true positive region. This preliminary study indicates that the bilateral subtraction technique is effective for improving the performance of a CAD scheme in whole breast ultrasound images.

[1]  T. M. Kolb,et al.  Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations. , 2002, Radiology.

[2]  Dar-Ren Chen,et al.  Watershed segmentation for breast tumor in 2-D sonography. , 2004, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[3]  Hiroshi Fujita,et al.  Development of Breast Ultrasound CAD System for Screening , 2006, Digital Mammography / IWDM.

[4]  Daniel B Kopans,et al.  Breast-cancer screening with ultrasonography , 1999, The Lancet.

[5]  M. Giger,et al.  Computerized detection and classification of cancer on breast ultrasound. , 2004, Academic radiology.

[6]  Luc Vincent,et al.  Watersheds in Digital Spaces: An Efficient Algorithm Based on Immersion Simulations , 1991, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[7]  J. V. van Engelshoven,et al.  The role of ultrasonography as an adjunct to mammography in the detection of breast cancer. a systematic review. , 2002, European journal of cancer.

[8]  K Doi,et al.  Computerized detection of masses in digital mammograms: automated alignment of breast images and its effect on bilateral-subtraction technique. , 1994, Medical physics.

[9]  Chen-Ming Kuo,et al.  Image stitching and computer-aided diagnosis for whole breast ultrasound image , 2006 .

[10]  Ruey-Feng Chang,et al.  Whole breast computer-aided screening using free-hand ultrasound , 2005 .

[11]  M. Giger,et al.  Computerized diagnosis of breast lesions on ultrasound. , 2002, Medical physics.

[12]  Hiroshi Fujita,et al.  Computer-aided detection system of breast masses on ultrasound images , 2006, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[13]  M L Giger,et al.  Computerized detection of masses in digital mammograms: analysis of bilateral subtraction images. , 1991, Medical physics.

[14]  John F. Canny,et al.  A Computational Approach to Edge Detection , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[15]  M. Giger,et al.  Computerized lesion detection on breast ultrasound. , 2002, Medical physics.

[16]  Maryellen L. Giger,et al.  Automated seeded lesion segmentation on digital mammograms , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.