Cisgenic plants are similar to traditionally bred plants

![][1] ![][2] ![][3] The testing and release of genetically modified organisms (GMOs)—in particular GM plants—is tightly regulated internationally to prevent any negative effects on the environment or human health. However, these regulations are based on transgenic organisms and do not discriminate between transgenic plants and cisgenic plants, although we believe that they are fundamentally different (see sidebarNow, cisgenic plants fall under regulations designed for transgenic organisms, possibly because there have not yet been any applications for the approval of the deliberate release of cisgenic plants into the environment. Definitions of key terms in relation to plants Cisgenesis is the genetic modification of a recipient plant with a natural gene from a crossable—sexually compatible—plant. Such a gene includes its introns and is flanked by its native promoter and terminator in the normalsense orientation.Cisgenic plants can harbour one or more cisgenes, but they do not contain any transgenes. Transgenesis is the genetic modification of a recipient plant with one or more genes from any non‐plant organism, or from a donor plant that is sexually incompatible with the recipient plant. This includes gene sequences of any origin in the anti‐sense orientation, any artificial combination of a coding sequence and a regulatory sequence, such as a promoter from another gene, or a synthetic gene. Traditional breeding encompasses all plant breeding methods that do not fall under current GMO regulations.As the European legal framework defines GMOs and specifies various breeding techniques that are excluded from the GMO regulations,we use this framework as a starting point, particularly the European Directive 2001/18/EC on the deliberate release of GMOs into the environment (European Parliament, 2001). Excluded from this GMO Directive are longstanding cross breeding, in vitro fertilization, polyploidy induction,mutagenesis and fusion of protoplasts from sexually compatible plants (European Parliament, 2001). Although transgenesis and cisgenesis both use the same genetic … [1]: /embed/graphic-1.gif [2]: /embed/graphic-2.gif [3]: /embed/graphic-3.gif

[1]  Joachim Messing,et al.  Gene movement by Helitron transposons contributes to the haplotype variability of maize. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  Daniel Schubert,et al.  A comprehensive characterization of single-copy T-DNA insertions in the Arabidopsis thaliana genome , 2003, Plant Molecular Biology.

[3]  Eugen C. Buehler,et al.  Sequence and analysis of chromosome 2 of the plant Arabidopsis thaliana , 1999, Nature.

[4]  Wayne Parrott,et al.  Regulating transgenic crops sensibly: lessons from plant breeding, biotechnology and genomics , 2005, Nature Biotechnology.

[5]  H. Goodman,et al.  Effects of ionizing radiation on a plant genome: analysis of two Arabidopsis transparent testa mutations. , 1992, The Plant cell.

[6]  L. Comai,et al.  The effect of stress on genome regulation and structure. , 2004, Annals of botany.

[7]  F. Krens,et al.  Do cisgenic plants warrant less stringent oversight? , 2006, Nature Biotechnology.

[8]  E. Stahl,et al.  Evolutionary Dynamics of Plant R-Genes , 2001, Science.

[9]  X. Chen,et al.  Development and identification of wheat–Haynaldia villosa T6DL.6VS chromosome translocation lines conferring resistance to powdery mildew , 2005 .

[10]  A. Patocchi,et al.  The HcrVf2 gene from a wild apple confers scab resistance to a transgenic cultivated variety. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  J. Milner,et al.  Characterization of gamma irradiation-induced deletion mutations at a selectable locus in Arabidopsis. , 1998, Mutation research.

[12]  S. Wertheim,et al.  Fundamentals of temperate zone tree fruit production. , 2005 .

[13]  Andy Pereira,et al.  The Rpi-blb2 gene from Solanum bulbocastanum is an Mi-1 gene homolog conferring broad-spectrum late blight resistance in potato. , 2005, The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology.

[14]  Hua Yan,et al.  Crop Improvement through Modification of the Plant's Own Genome , 2004, Plant Physiology.

[15]  M. Maluszynski,et al.  Global impact of mutation-derived varieties , 2004, Euphytica.

[16]  F. Krens,et al.  Effective production of marker-free transgenic strawberry plants using inducible site-specific recombination and a bifunctional selectable marker gene. , 2004, Plant biotechnology journal.

[17]  J. Sweet,et al.  Introgression from Genetically Modified Plants into Wild Relatives , 2004 .

[18]  Jan-Peter Nap,et al.  Intragenic vectors for gene transfer without foreign DNA , 2007, Euphytica.

[19]  R. Visser,et al.  Comparative genomics enabled the isolation of the R3a late blight resistance gene in potato. , 2005, The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology.

[20]  F. Tax,et al.  T-DNA-associated duplication/translocations in Arabidopsis. Implications for mutant analysis and functional genomics. , 2001, Plant physiology.