Empowerment, Leadership, and Teachers' Intentions to Stay in or Leave the Profession or Their Schools in North Carolina Charter Schools

Teacher attrition and migration plague many American schools. The situation is even more dire in charter schools across the country. On average, teacher attrition is 15 to 40% higher in charter schools than in traditional schools. This study examined the relationships among teacher empowerment, school leadership, and intentions to stay in or leave the profession within North Carolina charter schools using data from the North Carolina 2006 Teacher Working Conditions survey. Results indicate that leadership is a stronger predictor of teachers' intentions to stay in or leave the profession or to migrate to a different school/district or state.

[1]  J. Abdallah.  Lowering Teacher Attrition Rates through Collegiality , 2009, Academic Leadership: The Online Journal.

[2]  S. Loeb,et al.  Who Leaves? Teacher Attrition and Student Achievement. NBER Working Paper No. 14022. , 2008 .

[3]  Susanna Loeb,et al.  Who Leaves? Teacher Attrition and Student Achievement , 2008 .

[4]  E. Hirsch,et al.  Teacher Working Conditions Are Student Learning Conditions: A Report on the 2006 North Carolina Teacher Working Conditions Survey. , 2007 .

[5]  B. Applegate,et al.  Teacher Attrition in Charter Schools , 2007 .

[6]  J. Sledge,et al.  Tolerated Failure or Missed Opportunities and Potentials for Teacher Leadership in Urban Schools , 2006 .

[7]  Mark Schneider,et al.  Fix it and They Might Stay: School Facility Quality and Teacher Retention in Washington, D.C. , 2005, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[8]  Jerry L. Patterson,et al.  Sharing the Lead. , 2004 .

[9]  A. Somech,et al.  Influence of Teacher Empowerment on Teachers' Organizational Commitment, Professional Commitment and Organizational Citizenship Behavior in Schools. , 2004 .

[10]  K. Church,et al.  with & . b). Teacher working conditions are student learning conditions: A report to Governor Mike Easley on the North Carolina Teacher Working Conditions Survey. , 2004 .

[11]  Educational Improvement,et al.  Review of Research: How Leadership Influences Student Learning , 2004 .

[12]  Priscilla Wohlstetter,et al.  Working Conditions In Charter Schools , 2003 .

[13]  Gary Miron,et al.  What's Public About Charter Schools?: Lessons Learned About Choice and Accountability , 2002 .

[14]  James R. Crawford.  Teacher Autonomy and Accountability in Charter Schools , 2001 .

[15]  Wayne K. Hoy,et al.  School Characteristics and Educational Outcomes: Toward an Organizational Model of Student Achievement in Middle Schools , 2000 .

[16]  Richard M. Ingersoll,et al.  Teacher Turnover , Teacher Shortages , and the Organization of Schools , 2001 .

[17]  M. O'Hair,et al.  Teacher Leadership: In What Ways? For What Purpose? , 1997 .

[18]  A. Contreras.  The Charter School Movement in California and Elsewhere , 1995 .

[19]  James R. Pennell,et al.  Teacher Commitment, Working Conditions, and Differential Incentive Policies , 1993 .

[20]  P. Short,et al.  Job Satisfaction and Empowerment among Teacher Leaders, Reading Recovery Teachers, and Regular Classroom Teachers. , 1993 .