Sophisticated designs of the pupil illumination fill of scanners and steppers permit considerable improvements of the resolution and the quality of the optical projection for certain critical patterns. However, the mask layout can have quite different requirements for the resolution as well as the shape of the critical patterns in the two spatial directions. For instance, typical DRAM designs have one orientation with much higher requirements than the other orientation. This asymmetry can be accounted for with a corresponding pupil fill that has a reduced symmetry as well. It is for example possible to combine high resolution and high contrast of the most critical pattern in one spatial orientation at the cost of the other orientation. Unfortunately, this leads to an asymmetric source distribution with x-y dependent optical proximity effects. Therefore the transfer of one and the same pattern from the mask to the wafer will differ if this pattern is rotated by 90 degrees. But fortunately, this anisotropic mapping can be compensated by applying an appropriate optical proximity correction (OPC) which is anisotropic as well. In the current work, we measure on silicon the orientation dependent proximity effect for a customized and strongly asymmetric pupil illumination fill design. With this input data, we build a lithography simulation model which is able to reproduce this anisotropy well. We further perform full chip anisotropic OPC and present the actual success of this resolution enhancement technique with various measurement results and printed wafer images. We also discuss the challenges and problems of this method.
[1]
Ralph E. Schlief.
Effect of data selection and noise on goodness of OPC model fit
,
2004,
SPIE Advanced Lithography.
[2]
Olivier Toublan,et al.
Improvement of empirical OPC model robustness using full-chip aerial image analysis
,
2003,
SPIE Photomask Technology.
[3]
Thuy Do,et al.
Universal process modeling with VTRE for OPC
,
2002,
SPIE Advanced Lithography.
[4]
D. Fehrs,et al.
Illuminator modification of an optical aligner
,
2004
.
[5]
Ralf Ziebold,et al.
Impact of measured pupil illumination fill distribution on lithography simulation and OPC models
,
2004,
SPIE Advanced Lithography.
[6]
Alan E. Rosenbluth,et al.
Optimum mask and source patterns to print a given shape
,
2002
.
[7]
Shumay Shang,et al.
The influence of calibration pattern coverage for lumped parameter resist models on OPC convergence
,
2006,
SPIE Advanced Lithography.
[8]
Jerome Belledent,et al.
Improving model-based OPC performance for the 65-nm node through calibration set optimization
,
2005,
SPIE Advanced Lithography.