Facts and Myths about Research on Public Policy Implementation: Out‐of‐Fashion, Allegedly Dead, But Still Very Much Alive and Relevant

Despite several decades of research on public policy implementation we know surprisingly little, not only about cumulative research results, but also about several other key aspects of this research field. This article tries to amend these deficiencies by presenting the results of a comprehensive literature survey. Its main purpose is to challenge, revise, and supplement some conventional wisdom about implementation research. A second motivation is to lay the foundation for and initiate a much needed synthesis of empirical research results. The main results are: The overall volume of publications on policy implementation has not stagnated or declined dramatically since the mid 1980s as is commonly asserted. On the contrary, it has continued to grow exponentially through the 1990s and into the twenty-first century. Even more surprising is that a large number of publications are located outside the core fields. Hence, the literature is substantially larger and more multidisciplinary than most commentators realize. Doctoral dissertations are the most ignored, but probably the richest, largest, and best source of empirical research results. Tracing the origin as well as the location of the disciplinary and geographical cradle of implementation studies must also be readjusted significantly. The ethnocentric bias of this research field toward the Western hemisphere has been, and still is, strong and some policy sectors are given much more attention than others. Although positive in many ways, the predominant multidisciplinary character of implementation research still poses some serious problems with respect to theory development. Thus, I discuss whether a resurgence of interest in policy implementation among policy scholars may already be occurring. Finally, I suggest that the time is long overdue for efforts to synthesize research results in a more rigorous scientific manner than has hitherto been done.

[1]  Peter J. Robertson,et al.  Outcomes of Planned Organizational Change in the Public Sector: A Meta-Analytic Comparison to the Private Sector , 1995 .

[2]  D. Rondinelli,et al.  Decentralization and development : Policy implementation in developing countries , 1983 .

[3]  Peter John,et al.  Analysing Public Policy , 1998 .

[4]  Carl E. Van Horn,et al.  The Policy Implementation Process: A Conceptual Framework , 1975 .

[5]  Merilee S. Grindle Politics and Policy Implementation in the Third World , 1980 .

[6]  D. Palumbo,et al.  Implementation and the Policy Process: Opening Up the Black Box , 1990 .

[7]  Ernest R. Alexander,et al.  From Idea to Action , 1985 .

[8]  Laurence J. O'Toole,et al.  Policy Recommendations for Multi-Actor Implementation: An Assessment of the Field , 1986, Journal of Public Policy.

[9]  Paul A. Sabatier,et al.  Top-Down and Bottom-Up Approaches to Implementation Research: a Critical Analysis and Suggested Synthesis , 1986, Journal of Public Policy.

[10]  Michael Hill Implementation Theory: yesterday's issue? , 1997 .

[11]  Michael Hill,et al.  Implementing Public Policy: Governance in Theory and in Practice , 2002 .

[12]  B. Guy Peters,et al.  A DESIGN PERSPECTIVE ON POLICY IMPLEMENTATION: THE FALLACIES OF MISPLACED PRESCRIPTION , 1987 .

[13]  Laurence J. O'Toole,et al.  PUBLIC POLICY IMPLEMENTATION: EVOLUTION OF THE FIELD AND AGENDA FOR FUTURE RESEARCH , 1987 .

[14]  Bo Rothstein Just Institutions Matter: The Moral and Political Logic of the Universal Welfare State , 1998 .

[15]  L. O'toole RESEARCH ON POLICY IMPLEMENTATION: ASSESSMENT AND PROSPECTS , 2000 .

[16]  P. Sabatier An advocacy coalition framework of policy change and the role of policy-oriented learning therein , 1988 .

[17]  K. B. Hendricks,et al.  Does Implementing an Effective TQM Program Actually Improve Operating Performance? Empirical Evidence from Firms That Have Won Quality Awards , 1997 .

[18]  Robert T. Nakamura,et al.  THE TEXTBOOK POLICY PROCESS AND IMPLEMENTATION RESEARCH , 1987 .

[19]  Susan M. Barrett Implementation Studies: Time for a Revival? Personal Reflections on 20 Years of Implementation Studies , 2004 .

[20]  Gregg B. Jackson,et al.  Meta-Analysis: Cumulating Research Findings Across Studies , 1982 .

[21]  J. Schofield,et al.  Symposium on Implementing Public Policy: Learning from Theory and Practice , 2004 .

[22]  Richard Jung,et al.  The Utility of a Longitudinal Approach in Assessing Implementation: A Thirteen-Year View of Title I, ESEA , 1980 .

[23]  Søren C. Winter Integrating Implementation Research , 1990 .

[24]  M. Mclaughlin Learning From Experience: Lessons From Policy Implementation , 1987 .

[25]  Gregg B. Jackson,et al.  Methods for Integrative Reviews , 1980 .

[26]  M. Goggin,et al.  Implementation Theory and Practice: Toward a Third Generation , 1990, American Political Science Review.

[27]  Peter deLeon,et al.  What Ever Happened to Policy Implementation? An Alternative Approach , 2002 .

[28]  Thomas A. P. Sinclair IMPLEMENTATION THEORY AND PRACTICE: UNCOVERING POLICY AND ADMINISTRATION LINKAGES IN THE 1990s , 2001 .

[29]  J. Schofield A Model of Learned Implementation , 2004 .

[30]  William G. Potter,et al.  "Of Making Many Books There Is No End": Bibliometrics and Libraries. , 1988 .

[31]  Robert K. Yin,et al.  Studying the implementation of public programs , 1980 .

[32]  D. Brinkerhoff Process perspectives on policy change: Highlighting implementation , 1996 .

[33]  Elinor R. Bowen The Pressman-Wildavsky Paradox: Four Addenda or Why Models Based on Probability Theory Can Predict Implementation Success and Suggest Useful Tactical Advice for Implementers , 1982 .

[34]  Thomas B. Smith,et al.  The policy implementation process , 1973 .

[35]  Peter deLeon,et al.  The Missing Link Revisited , 2005 .

[36]  Richard E. Matland Synthesizing the Implementation Literature: The Ambiguity-Conflict Model of Policy Implementation , 1995 .

[37]  L. O'toole The Theory-Practice Issue in Policy Implementation Research , 2004 .

[38]  J. Schofield Time for Revival? Public policy implementation: a review of the literature and an agenda for future research , 2001 .