Two is Better Than One. Improved Attention Guiding in AR by Combining Techniques

Search tasks in production environments have been shown to be significantly improved by attention guiding techniques in augmented reality (AR). In mobile use cases, head-mounted displays support context-sensitive and flexible search tasks. To improve search time and navigation efficiency, first concepts like attention funnel and spherical wave based guidance techniques have been tested successfully in comparison to simple arrow navigation. Existing research indicates that for two-dimensional interfaces, a differentiation into coarse and fine navigation will result in further performance improvements. In this article, a laboratory study is presented with a stereoscopic head-mounted display that examines whether an additional arrow guiding technique for coarse navigation could improve both search time and efficiency of existing techniques. Results show objectively superior performance for one of the combined techniques in comparison to the unimodal attention guiding techniques and subjective preference by the participants. Further research should investigate the performance in a real environment.

[1]  Frank Biocca,et al.  Attention funnel: omnidirectional 3D cursor for mobile augmented reality platforms , 2006, CHI.

[2]  Philipp Hein,et al.  Towards the Development of a Universal Testing Environment for Attention Guiding Techniques , 2019 .

[3]  Thies Pfeiffer,et al.  Attention guiding techniques using peripheral vision and eye tracking for feedback in augmented-reality-based assistance systems , 2017, 2017 IEEE Symposium on 3D User Interfaces (3DUI).

[4]  Carl Gutwin,et al.  Wedge: clutter-free visualization of off-screen locations , 2008, CHI.

[5]  Susanne Boll,et al.  Beyond Halo and Wedge: visualizing out-of-view objects on head-mounted virtual and augmented reality devices , 2018, MobileHCI.

[6]  F C Okuda,et al.  Evaluation of the TNO -random-dot stereogram test. , 1977, The American orthoptic journal.

[7]  Kiyoshi Kiyokawa,et al.  Analysing the effects of a wide field of view augmented reality display on search performance in divided attention tasks , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR).

[8]  Laurence Nigay,et al.  [POSTER] Halo3D: A Technique for Visualizing Off-Screen Points of Interest in Mobile Augmented Reality , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR-Adjunct).

[9]  Markus Funk,et al.  Pick from here!: an interactive mobile cart using in-situ projection for order picking , 2015, UbiComp.

[10]  Willibald A. Günthner,et al.  Pick-by-Vision: A first stress test , 2009, 2009 8th IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality.

[11]  A. Bullinger,et al.  Spatially distributed visual , auditory and multimodal warning signals – a comparison , 2017 .

[12]  Steven K. Feiner,et al.  Exploring the Benefits of Augmented Reality Documentation for Maintenance and Repair , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[13]  Gudrun Klinker,et al.  Effective control of a car driver's attention for visual and acoustic guidance towards the direction of imminent dangers , 2006, 2006 IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality.

[14]  Laurence Nigay,et al.  Halo3D: a technique for visualizing off-screen points of interest in mobile augmented reality , 2017, IHM.

[15]  Steven K. Feiner,et al.  ParaFrustum: visualization techniques for guiding a user to a constrained set of viewing positions and orientations , 2014, UIST.

[16]  Patrick Baudisch,et al.  Halo: a technique for visualizing off-screen objects , 2003, CHI '03.