Developing pruning wound protection strategies for managing Eutypa dieback
暂无分享,去创建一个
E. Scott | T. Wicks | M. Ayres | M. Sosnowski
[1] P. Fourie,et al. Protection of Grapevine Pruning Wounds against Eutypa lata by Biological and Chemical Methods , 2016 .
[2] E. Scott,et al. Evaluating Treatments and Spray Application for the Protection of Grapevine Pruning Wounds from Infection by Eutypa lata. , 2013, Plant disease.
[3] W. Gubler,et al. Pathogenicity of Diatrypaceous Fungi on Grapevines in Australia. , 2013, Plant disease.
[4] D. Gramaje,et al. Efficacy of fungicides on mycelial growth of diatrypaceous fungi associated with grapevine trunk disease , 2012, Australasian Plant Pathology.
[5] S. Rooney-Latham,et al. Evaluation of Pruning Wound Susceptibility and Protection Against Fungi Associated with Grapevine Trunk Diseases , 2010, American Journal of Enology and Viticulture.
[6] R. Herche. Control strategies for trunk diseases of grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) , 2009 .
[7] E. Scott,et al. Protection of grapevine pruning wounds from infection by Eutypa lata , 2008 .
[8] H. Oakey,et al. Protection of grapevine pruning wounds from infection by Eutypa lata using Trichoderma harzianum and Fusarium lateritium , 2005, Australasian Plant Pathology.
[9] W. Gubler,et al. Use of Boron for the Control of Eutypa Dieback of Grapevines. , 2005, Plant disease.
[10] R. Wong,et al. Eutypa dieback in grapevines: differential production of acetylenic phenol metabolites by strains of Eutypa lata. , 2002, Journal of agricultural and food chemistry.
[11] R. Tabacchi,et al. Eutypine, a phytotoxin produced by Eutypa lata the causal agent of dying-arm disease of grapevine. , 1991 .
[12] S. Australian. Effect of the inoculum dose of three grapevine trunk pathogens on the infection of artificially inoculated pruning wounds , 2015 .
[13] Ainara López,et al. Measuring the Accuracy of a Pesticide Treatment by an Image Analyzer , 2013 .
[14] T. Wicks,et al. Yearly variation in Eutypa dieback symptoms and the relationship to grapevine yield , 2001 .
[15] D. Ramsdell. Winter air-blast sprayer applications of benomyl for reduction of eutypa dieback disease incidence in a Concord grape vineyard in Michigan , 1995 .
[16] G. Munkvold,et al. Reductions in yield and vegetative growth of grapevines due to Eutypa dieback , 1994 .
[17] G. Munkvold,et al. The effects of fungicides on Eutypa lata germination, growth, and infection of grapevines. , 1993 .
[18] G. Munkvold,et al. Efficacy of natural epiphytes and colonizers of grapevine pruning wounds for biological control of Eutypa dieback. , 1993 .
[19] M. Carter. The status of Eutypa lata as a pathogen. , 1991 .
[20] C. L. Burton,et al. Fungicidal control of Eutypa armeniacae infecting concord grapevine in Michigan , 1983 .
[21] R. Pearson. Protection of Grapevine Pruning Wounds from Infection byEutypa Armeniacaein New York State , 1982, American Journal of Enology and Viticulture.
[22] A. Kasimatis,et al. Further evidence that Eutypa armeniacae-not Phomopsis viticola-incites dead arm symptoms on grape. , 1981 .
[23] A. Kasimatis,et al. Protection of grapevine pruning wounds from Eutypa dieback. , 1980 .
[24] D. Ramos,et al. Production and dispersal of ascospores of Eutypa armeniacae in California. , 1975 .
[25] T. Price,et al. Biological control of Eutypa armeniacae. III. A comparison of chemical, biological and integrated control , 1975 .
[26] W. Moller,et al. The quantity of inoculum required to infect apricot and other prunus species with Eutypa armeniacae , 1971 .
[27] W. Moller,et al. Production and Dispersal of Ascospores in Eutypa Armeniacae , 1965 .
[28] M. Carter. Eutypa armeniacae Hansf. & Carter, sp. nov., an airborne vascular pathogen of Prunus armeniaca L. in southern Australia , 1957 .