Extending the survival signature paradigm to complex systems with non-repairable dependent failures

Dependent failures impose severe consequences on a complex system’s reliability and overall performance, and a realistic assessment, therefore, requires an adequate consideration of these failures. System survival signature opens up a new and efficient way to compute a system’s reliability, given its ability to segregate the structural from the probabilistic attributes of the system. Consequently, it outperforms the well-known system reliability evaluation techniques, when solicited for problems like maintenance optimisation, requiring repetitive system evaluations. The survival signature, however, is premised on the statistical independence between component failure times and, more generally, on the theory of weak exchangeability, for dependent component failures. The assumption of independence is flawed for most realistic engineering systems while the latter entails the painstaking and sometimes impossible task of deriving the joint survival function of the system components. This article, therefore, proposes a novel, generally applicable, and efficient Monte Carlo Simulation approach that allows the survival signature to be intuitively used for the reliability evaluation of systems susceptible to induced failures. Multiple component failure modes, as well, are considered, and sensitivities are analysed to identify the most critical common-cause group to the survivability of the system. Examples demonstrate the superiority of the approach.

[1]  Frank P. A. Coolen,et al.  Marginal and joint reliability importance based on survival signature , 2018, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[2]  Balbir S. Dhillon,et al.  COMMON-CAUSE FAILURES IN ENGINEERING SYSTEMS: A REVIEW , 1994 .

[3]  Edoardo Patelli,et al.  Imprecise system reliability and component importance based on survival signature , 2016, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[4]  Frank P. A. Coolen,et al.  Predictive inference for system reliability after common-cause component failures , 2015, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[5]  F. Coolen,et al.  Mean residual life of coherent systems consisting of multiple types of dependent components , 2018 .

[6]  F. Coolen,et al.  Generalizing the signature to systems with multiple types of components , 2013, SOCO 2013.

[7]  Edoardo Patelli,et al.  Efficient availability assessment of reconfigurable multi-state systems with interdependencies , 2017, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[8]  Matthias C. M. Troffaes,et al.  A robust Bayesian approach to modeling epistemic uncertainty in common-cause failure models , 2013, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[9]  Ali Mosleh,et al.  A general cause based methodology for analysis of common cause and dependent failures in system risk and reliability assessments , 2016, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[10]  Enrico Zio,et al.  A stochastic hybrid systems model of common-cause failures of degrading components , 2018, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[11]  Sean Reed,et al.  An efficient algorithm for exact computation of system and survival signatures using binary decision diagrams , 2017, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[12]  Edoardo Patelli,et al.  Maintenance Strategy Optimization for Complex Power Systems Susceptible to Maintenance Delays and Operational Dynamics , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Reliability.

[13]  Enrico Zio,et al.  A power-flow emulator approach for resilience assessment of repairable power grids subject to weather-induced failures and data deficiency , 2018 .

[14]  S. Eryilmaz The concept of weak exchangeability and its applications , 2017 .

[15]  Min Ouyang,et al.  Review on modeling and simulation of interdependent critical infrastructure systems , 2014, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[16]  Eric R. Ziegel,et al.  System Reliability Theory: Models, Statistical Methods, and Applications , 2004, Technometrics.

[17]  Edoardo Patelli,et al.  A hybrid load flow and event driven simulation approach to multi-state system reliability evaluation , 2016, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[18]  Enrico Zio,et al.  A Monte Carlo methodological approach to plant availability modeling with maintenance, aging and obsolescence , 2000, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[19]  Marvin Rausand,et al.  System Reliability Theory: Models, Statistical Methods, and Applications , 2003 .

[20]  Dana Kelly,et al.  Common-cause failure analysis in event assessment , 2008 .

[21]  Simon P Wilson,et al.  Bayesian Inference for Reliability of Systems and Networks Using the Survival Signature. , 2015, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[22]  Francisco J. Samaniego,et al.  System Signatures and Their Applications in Engineering Reliability , 2007 .

[23]  Gregory Levitin,et al.  The Universal Generating Function in Reliability Analysis and Optimization , 2005 .

[24]  Ali Mosleh Common cause failures: An analysis methodology and examples , 1991 .

[25]  H. M. Paula,et al.  Procedures for treating common cause failures in safety and reliability studies: Volume 1, Procedural framework and examples: Final report , 1988 .

[26]  David W. Coit,et al.  Optimization of system reliability in the presence of common cause failures , 2007, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[27]  Edoardo Patelli,et al.  Simulation methods for system reliability using the survival signature , 2017, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..