Complementary aspects of spatial resolution and signal-to-noise ratio in computational imaging

A generic computational imaging setup is considered which assumes sequential illumination of a semi-transparent object by an arbitrary set of structured illumination patterns. For each incident illumination pattern, all transmitted light is collected by a photon-counting bucket (single-pixel) detector. The transmission coefficients measured in this way are then used to reconstruct the spatial distribution of the object's projected transmission. It is demonstrated that the squared spatial resolution of such a setup is usually equal to the ratio of the image area to the number of linearly independent illumination patterns. If the noise in the measured transmission coefficients is dominated by photon shot noise, then the ratio of the spatially-averaged squared mean signal to the spatially-averaged noise variance in the "flat" distribution reconstructed in the absence of the object, is equal to the average number of registered photons when the illumination patterns are orthogonal. The signal-to-noise ratio in a reconstructed transmission distribution is always lower in the case of non-orthogonal illumination patterns due to spatial correlations in the measured data. Examples of imaging methods relevant to the presented analysis include conventional imaging with a pixelated detector, computational ghost imaging, compressive sensing, super-resolution imaging and computed tomography.

[1]  D. Paganin,et al.  2D and 3D X-ray phase retrieval of multi-material objects using a single defocus distance. , 2010, Optics express.

[2]  B. Hecht,et al.  Principles of nano-optics , 2006 .

[3]  E.J. Candes,et al.  An Introduction To Compressive Sampling , 2008, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[4]  R. Boyd,et al.  An introduction to ghost imaging: quantum and classical , 2017, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[5]  Timur E. Gureyev,et al.  Noise propagation in x-ray phase-contrast imaging and computed tomography , 2014 .

[6]  Manuel Nieto-Vesperinas,et al.  Scattering and diffraction in physical optics , 2006 .

[7]  Introduction to Functional Analysis for Scientists and Technologists , 1964 .

[8]  Practical x-ray ghost imaging with synchrotron light , 2017, 1710.00727.

[9]  J. Romberg,et al.  Imaging via Compressive Sampling , 2008, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[10]  T. Gureyev,et al.  Spatial resolution, signal-to-noise and information capacity of linear imaging systems. , 2015, Optics express.

[11]  K K W Siu,et al.  Interface-specific x-ray phase retrieval tomography of complex biological organs , 2011, Physics in medicine and biology.

[12]  D. Gabor A New Microscopic Principle , 1948, Nature.

[13]  A. Gatti,et al.  Differential ghost imaging. , 2010, Physical review letters.

[14]  P. Moreau,et al.  Ghost Imaging Using Optical Correlations , 2018 .

[15]  A. Gatti,et al.  Coherent imaging with pseudo-thermal incoherent light , 2005, quant-ph/0504082.

[16]  S. Wilkins,et al.  Simultaneous phase and amplitude extraction from a single defocused image of a homogeneous object , 2002, Journal of microscopy.

[17]  Lukas Novotny,et al.  Principles of Nano-Optics by Lukas Novotny , 2006 .

[18]  Ling-An Wu,et al.  Sub-Rayleigh resolution ghost imaging by spatial low-pass filtering. , 2017, Optics letters.

[19]  Jeffrey H. Shapiro,et al.  Computational ghost imaging , 2008, 2009 Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics and 2009 Conference on Quantum electronics and Laser Science Conference.

[20]  On noise-resolution uncertainty in quantum field theory , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[21]  A. Messiah Quantum Mechanics , 1961 .

[22]  Giuliano Scarcelli,et al.  Sub-Rayleigh imaging via speckle illumination. , 2013, Optics letters.

[23]  T. Gureyev,et al.  On the "unreasonable" effectiveness of transport of intensity imaging and optical deconvolution. , 2017, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[24]  A. Barty,et al.  Quantitative phase‐amplitude microscopy. III. The effects of noise , 2004, Journal of microscopy.

[25]  J. Jackson Classical Electrodynamics, 3rd Edition , 1998 .

[26]  Giuliana Tromba,et al.  Duality between noise and spatial resolution in linear systems. , 2014, Optics express.

[27]  Kenneth Baldwin,et al.  Ghost imaging with atoms , 2016, Nature.

[28]  O. Katz,et al.  Ghost imaging with a single detector , 2008, 0812.2633.

[29]  E. Tajahuerce,et al.  Single-pixel digital ghost holography , 2012, 1305.7069.

[30]  T. Gureyev,et al.  CT dose reduction factors in the thousands using X-ray phase contrast , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[31]  J. Shapiro,et al.  Ghost imaging: from quantum to classical to computational , 2010 .

[32]  Kelum A. A. Gamage,et al.  Coded-aperture imaging systems: Past, present and future development - A review , 2016 .

[33]  O. Katz,et al.  Compressive ghost imaging , 2009, 0905.0321.

[34]  Timur E. Gureyev,et al.  Investigation of the imaging quality of synchrotron-based phase-contrast mammographic tomography , 2014 .

[35]  M. Padgett,et al.  3D Computational Imaging with Single-Pixel Detectors , 2013, Science.

[36]  M. Solomjak,et al.  Spectral Theory of Self-Adjoint Operators in Hilbert Space , 1987 .

[37]  J. Goodman Introduction to Fourier optics , 1969 .

[38]  H. Anton,et al.  Elementary linear algebra with applications , 1987 .

[39]  Convolution Formulation of Fresnel Diffraction , 1966 .

[40]  M. Teich,et al.  Fundamentals of Photonics , 1991 .

[41]  Communication modes with partially coherent fields. , 2007, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[42]  M. Teague Deterministic phase retrieval: a Green’s function solution , 1983 .