Contributions of Clinical and Technical Factors to Longitudinal Change in Trabecular Bone Score and Bone Density: A Registry‐Based Individual‐Level Analysis

Lumbar spine trabecular bone score (TBS), a gray‐level texture measure derived from spine dual‐energy X‐ray absorptiometry (DXA) images, is a bone mineral density (BMD)‐independent risk factor for fracture. An unresolved question is whether TBS is sufficiently responsive to change over time or in response to widely used osteoporosis therapy at the individual level to serve as a useful biomarker. Using the Manitoba DXA Registry, we identified 11,643 individuals age 40 years and older with two fan‐beam DXA scans performed on the same instrument within 5 years (mean interval 3.2 years), of whom 6985 (60.0%) received antiresorptive osteoporosis medication (majority oral bisphosphonate) between the scans. We examined factors that were associated with a change in lumbar spine TBS, lumbar spine BMD, and total hip BMD exceeding the 95% least significant change (LSC). Change exceeding the LSC was identified in 23.0% (9.3% increase, 13.8% decrease) of lumbar spine TBS, 38.2% (22.1% increase, 16.1% decrease) lumbar spine BMD, and 42.5% (17.6% increase, 24.9% decrease) total hip BMD measurement pairs. From regression models, the variables most strongly associated with significant change in TBS (decreasing order) were tissue thickness change, acquisition mode change, weight change, and spine percent fat change. Consistent with the insensitivity of TBS to oral antiresorptive therapies, use of these agents showed very little effect on TBS change. In contrast, for both spine BMD change and total hip BMD change, osteoporosis medication use was the most significant variable, whereas tissue thickness change, acquisition mode change, and weight change had relatively weak effects. In summary, change in spine TBS using the present algorithm appears to be strongly affected by technical factors. This suggests a limited role, if any, for using TBS change in untreated individuals or for monitoring response to antiresorptive treatment in routine clinical practice with the current version of the TBS algorithm. © 2023 The Authors. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR).

[1]  L. Lix,et al.  Apparent "Rapid Loss" After Short-Interval Bone Density Testing in Menopausal Women is Usually a Measurement Artifact. , 2022, The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism.

[2]  E. Vittinghoff,et al.  Validation of the Surrogate Threshold Effect for Change in Bone Mineral Density as a Surrogate Endpoint for Fracture Outcomes: The FNIH‐ASBMR SABRE Project , 2021, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[3]  D. Hans,et al.  Clinical Performance of the Updated Trabecular Bone Score (TBS) Algorithm, Which Accounts for the Soft Tissue Thickness: The OsteoLaus Study , 2019, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[4]  E. Schwartz,et al.  Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry Monitoring With Trabecular Bone Score: The 2019 ISCD Official Positions. , 2019, Journal of clinical densitometry : the official journal of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry.

[5]  Ernest Yeboah Boateng,et al.  A Review of the Logistic Regression Model with Emphasis on Medical Research , 2019, Journal of Data Analysis and Information Processing.

[6]  J. Kanis,et al.  Performance of FRAX in Women with Breast Cancer Initiating Aromatase Inhibitor Therapy: A Registry‐Based Cohort Study , 2019, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[7]  J. Reginster,et al.  Relationship Between Bone Mineral Density T‐Score and Nonvertebral Fracture Risk Over 10 Years of Denosumab Treatment , 2019, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[8]  J. Cauley,et al.  Change in Bone Density and Reduction in Fracture Risk: A Meta‐Regression of Published Trials , 2019, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[9]  N. Binkley,et al.  Effect of vertebral exclusion on TBS and FRAX calculations , 2018, Archives of Osteoporosis.

[10]  Eun-Hee Cho,et al.  Longitudinal Change in Trabecular Bone Score during and after Treatment of Osteoporosis in Postmenopausal Korean Women , 2017, Journal of bone metabolism.

[11]  C. Cooper,et al.  UK clinical guideline for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis , 2017, Archives of Osteoporosis.

[12]  W. Leslie,et al.  Densitometer-Specific Differences in the Correlation Between Body Mass Index and Lumbar Spine Trabecular Bone Score. , 2017, Journal of clinical densitometry : the official journal of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry.

[13]  L. Lix,et al.  Change in Trabecular Bone Score (TBS) With Antiresorptive Therapy Does Not Predict Fracture in Women: The Manitoba BMD Cohort , 2017, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[14]  Lisa M Lix,et al.  Change in Bone Mineral Density Is an Indicator of Treatment-Related Antifracture Effect in Routine Clinical Practice , 2016, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[15]  J. Center,et al.  The Effect of Changing Scan Mode on Trabecular Bone Score Using Lunar Prodigy. , 2016, Journal of clinical densitometry : the official journal of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry.

[16]  A. Grey,et al.  Management recommendations for osteoporosis in clinical guidelines , 2016, Clinical endocrinology.

[17]  W. Chamroonrat,et al.  Simulated increased soft tissue thickness artefactually decreases trabecular bone score: a phantom study , 2016, BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders.

[18]  W. Leslie,et al.  Executive Summary of the 2015 ISCD Position Development Conference on Advanced Measures From DXA and QCT: Fracture Prediction Beyond BMD. , 2015, Journal of clinical densitometry : the official journal of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry.

[19]  Stephanie Boutroy,et al.  Fracture Risk Prediction by Non-BMD DXA Measures: the 2015 ISCD Official Positions Part 2: Trabecular Bone Score. , 2015, Journal of clinical densitometry : the official journal of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry.

[20]  R. Winzenrieth,et al.  Comparison between different bone treatments on areal bone mineral density (aBMD) and bone microarchitectural texture as assessed by the trabecular bone score (TBS). , 2015, Bone.

[21]  N. Binkley,et al.  Spine Trabecular Bone Score Precision, a Comparison Between GE Lunar Standard and High-Resolution Densitometers. , 2015, Journal of clinical densitometry : the official journal of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry.

[22]  F. Sardanelli,et al.  Reproducibility of trabecular bone score with different scan modes using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry: a phantom study , 2015, Skeletal Radiology.

[23]  J. Kanis,et al.  Adjusting Fracture Probability by Trabecular Bone Score , 2015, Calcified Tissue International.

[24]  F. Sardanelli,et al.  Short-term precision assessment of trabecular bone score and bone mineral density using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry with different scan modes: an in vivo study , 2015, European Radiology.

[25]  E. M. Lewiecki,et al.  Clinician’s Guide to Prevention and Treatment of Osteoporosis , 2014, Osteoporosis International.

[26]  W. Leslie Factors Affecting Short‐Term Bone Density Precision Assessment and the Effect on Patient Monitoring , 2007, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[27]  S. Jamal,et al.  Low bone mineral density and fracture burden in postmenopausal women , 2007, Canadian Medical Association Journal.

[28]  W. Leslie,et al.  Construction and validation of a population-based bone densitometry database. , 2005, Journal of clinical densitometry : the official journal of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry.

[29]  J. Rodriguez-Portales,et al.  Ten years' experience with alendronate for osteoporosis in postmenopausal women. , 2004, The New England journal of medicine.

[30]  S. Cummings,et al.  BMD at Multiple Sites and Risk of Fracture of Multiple Types: Long‐Term Results From the Study of Osteoporotic Fractures , 2003, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[31]  W. Leslie,et al.  Establishing a regional bone density program: lessons from the Manitoba experience. , 2003, Journal of clinical densitometry : the official journal of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry.

[32]  N. Roos,et al.  Revisiting the Manitoba Centre for Health Policy and Evaluation and its population-based health information system. , 1999, Medical care.

[33]  M S Calvo,et al.  Prevalence of Low Femoral Bone Density in Older U.S. Adults from NHANES III , 1997, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[34]  J. Kanis Primer on the Metabolic Bone Diseases and Disorders of Mineral Metabolism , 1994 .

[35]  Harry K. Genant,et al.  Consensus development conference: diagnosis, prophylaxis, and treatment of osteoporosis. , 1993, The American journal of medicine.

[36]  J. Cauley,et al.  Predictors of change of trabecular bone score (TBS) in older men: results from the Osteoporotic Fractures in Men (MrOS) Study , 2017, Osteoporosis International.