Is This Mine to Keep? Three‐dimensional Printing Enables Active, Personalized Learning in Anatomy

Understanding orbital anatomy is important for optometry students, but the learning resources available are often fragile, expensive, and accessible only during scheduled classes. Drawing on a constructivist, personalized approach to learning, this study investigated students’ perceptions of an alternative learning resource: a three‐dimensional (3D) printed model used in an active learning task. A human skull was three‐dimensionally scanned and used to produce a 3D printed model for each student. Students actively participated in model creation by tracing suture lines and coloring individual orbital bones during a practical class, then keeping the model for future study. Students’ perceptions of the 3D orbital model were examined through a questionnaire: the impact the model had on their learning; perceptions of the 3D orbit compared to traditional resources; and utility of having their own personalized model. The 3D orbit was well received by the student cohort. Participants (n = 69) preferred the 3D orbit as a resource for learning orbital bone anatomy compared to traditional learning resources, believing the model helped them to understand and visualize the spatial relationships of the bones, and that it increased their confidence to apply this knowledge. Overall, the participants liked that they co‐created the model, could touch and feel it, and that they had access to it whenever they liked. Three‐dimensional printing technology has the potential to enable the creation of effective learning resources that are robust, low‐cost and readily accessible to students, and should be considered by anyone wishing to incorporate personalized resources to their multimodal teaching repertoire.

[1]  J. Dutton Atlas of clinical and surgical orbital anatomy , 1994 .

[2]  Bipasha Choudhury,et al.  Use of interactive sessions and e‐learning in teaching anatomy to first‐year optometry students , 2009, Anatomical sciences education.

[3]  V. Braun,et al.  Using thematic analysis in psychology , 2006 .

[4]  Danae Romrell,et al.  The SAMR Model as a Framework for Evaluating mLearning , 2014 .

[5]  Meng Li,et al.  Three-dimensional printing models improve understanding of spinal fracture—A randomized controlled study in China , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[6]  A. Khurana,et al.  The anatomy of anatomy: A review for its modernization , 2010, Anatomical sciences education.

[7]  Lap Ki Chan,et al.  An analysis of the educational value of low‐fidelity anatomy models as external representations , 2011, Anatomical sciences education.

[8]  Stuart Bunt,et al.  Best teaching practices in anatomy education: A critical review. , 2016, Annals of anatomy = Anatomischer Anzeiger : official organ of the Anatomische Gesellschaft.

[9]  Annie Aarup Jensen,et al.  Re-Thinking Curriculum for 21st-Century Learners: Examining the Advantages and Disadvantages of Adding Co-Creative Aspects to Problem-Based Learning , 2017 .

[10]  Kent M. Ogden,et al.  Factors Affecting Dimensional Accuracy of 3-D Printed Anatomical Structures Derived from CT Data , 2015, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[11]  Esther M. Bergman,et al.  How much anatomy is enough? , 2008, Anatomical sciences education.

[12]  Jian-Shun Wang,et al.  The Accuracy of a Method for Printing Three-Dimensional Spinal Models , 2015, PloS one.

[13]  Wai Yee Yeong,et al.  Evaluation by medical students of the educational value of multi‐material and multi‐colored three‐dimensional printed models of the upper limb for anatomical education , 2018, Anatomical sciences education.

[14]  Claudio Violato,et al.  A meta‐analysis of the educational effectiveness of three‐dimensional visualization technologies in teaching anatomy , 2015, Anatomical sciences education.

[15]  F. Butera,et al.  Striving for Excellence Sometimes Hinders High Achievers: Performance-Approach Goals Deplete Arithmetical Performance in Students with High Working Memory Capacity , 2015, PloS one.

[16]  A. Winkelmann,et al.  Anatomical dissection as a teaching method in medical school: a review of the evidence , 2007, Medical education.

[17]  Ramin Javan,et al.  Understanding Spatially Complex Segmental and Branch Anatomy Using 3D Printing: Liver, Lung, Prostate, Coronary Arteries, and Circle of Willis. , 2016, Academic radiology.

[18]  Lawrence B. Flick,et al.  The meanings of hands-on science , 1993 .

[19]  J. McLachlan,et al.  Teaching anatomy without cadavers , 2004, Medical education.

[20]  Sven Reese,et al.  Fabrication and assessment of 3D printed anatomical models of the lower limb for anatomical teaching and femoral vessel access training in medicine , 2016, Anatomical sciences education.

[21]  Derek Covill,et al.  Take away body parts! An investigation into the use of 3D‐printed anatomical models in undergraduate anatomy education , 2018, Anatomical sciences education.

[22]  Wenhua Huang,et al.  Do Three-dimensional Visualization and Three-dimensional Printing Improve Hepatic Segment Anatomy Teaching? A Randomized Controlled Study. , 2016, Journal of surgical education.

[23]  Michelle Quayle,et al.  3D printed reproductions of orbital dissections: a novel mode of visualising anatomy for trainees in ophthalmology or optometry , 2015, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[24]  William D. Grant,et al.  Effective methods of teaching and learning in anatomy as a basic science: A BEME systematic review: BEME guide no. 44 , 2017, Medical teacher.

[25]  Helen L. Naug,et al.  Promoting metacognition in first year anatomy laboratories using plasticine modeling and drawing activities: A pilot study of the “Blank Page” technique , 2011, Anatomical sciences education.

[26]  A. Charchanti,et al.  Modernization of an anatomy class: From conceptualization to implementation. A case for integrated multimodal–multidisciplinary teaching , 2012, Anatomical sciences education.

[27]  G. Štrkalj,et al.  Current Applications and Future Perspectives of the Use of 3D Printing in Anatomical Training and Neurosurgery , 2016, Front. Neuroanat..

[28]  E. Kahu Framing student engagement in higher education , 2013 .

[29]  Thierry Rayna,et al.  From rapid prototyping to home fabrication: How 3D printing is changing business model innovation , 2016 .

[30]  Sarah B. Williams,et al.  “Let's Get Physical”: Advantages of a physical model over 3D computer models and textbooks in learning imaging anatomy , 2013, Anatomical sciences education.

[31]  Sydney S. Cash,et al.  Streamlined, Inexpensive 3D Printing of the Brain and Skull , 2015, PloS one.

[32]  Mark Frame,et al.  Rapid Prototyping in Orthopaedic Surgery: A User's Guide , 2012, TheScientificWorldJournal.

[33]  Tanya Kunberger,et al.  A low-cost approach for rapidly creating demonstration models for hands-on learning , 2018 .

[34]  Claudio Violato,et al.  The effectiveness of physical models in teaching anatomy: a meta-analysis of comparative studies , 2016, Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice.

[35]  J. Broadbent,et al.  The influence of academic self-efficacy on academic performance: A systematic review , 2016 .

[36]  Justin W. Adams,et al.  The production of anatomical teaching resources using three‐dimensional (3D) printing technology , 2014, Anatomical sciences education.

[37]  Alice M. Roberts,et al.  Human Anatomy: Let the students tell us how to teach , 2014, Anatomical sciences education.

[38]  Lei Tang,et al.  Maximizing modern distribution of complex anatomical spatial information: 3D reconstruction and rapid prototype production of anatomical corrosion casts of human specimens , 2012, Anatomical sciences education.

[39]  Wuyang Shui,et al.  The role of three-dimensional printed models of skull in anatomy education: a randomized controlled trail , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[40]  Jon Cornwall,et al.  The ethics of 3D printing copies of bodies donated for medical education and research: What is there to worry about? , 2016, The Australasian medical journal.

[41]  D. Patten,et al.  Anatomy teaching: ghosts of the past, present and future , 2006, Medical education.

[42]  Yahya E Choonara,et al.  3D-printing and the effect on medical costs: a new era? , 2016, Expert review of pharmacoeconomics & outcomes research.

[43]  Goran Štrkalj,et al.  The application of 3D printing in anatomy education , 2015, Medical education online.

[44]  P. Kiely,et al.  Optometry Australia Entry‐level Competency Standards for Optometry 2014 , 2015, Clinical & experimental optometry.

[45]  Erin J Smith,et al.  Using additive manufacturing in accuracy evaluation of reconstructions from computed tomography , 2013, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[46]  S. Marks,et al.  The role of three‐dimensional information in health care and medical education: The implications for anatomy and dissection , 2000, Clinical anatomy.

[47]  J. Biggs What the student does: teaching for enhanced learning , 1999 .

[48]  Justin W. Adams,et al.  Use of 3D printed models in medical education: A randomized control trial comparing 3D prints versus cadaveric materials for learning external cardiac anatomy , 2016, Anatomical sciences education.