Biyomekanik Analizi A Comparative Biomechanical Analysis ofPretzel: a Novel Arthroscopic Suture Knot

The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the biomechanical properties of a novel arthroscopic knot, Pretzel knot to be used in shoulder surgeries and compare it with two knots taken as standard: Samsung Medical Center(SMC) and Nicky's knots. Two groups have been formed: unbackedgroup (Pretzel and SMC knots), backed group (Pretzel, SMC and Nicky's knots backed with 3 RHAPs). Both groups have been tested with load to failure test and cyclic loading test. Parameters consideredfor both groups werefor loop security, mechanism offailure, permanent loosening, load at failure and elongation at failure. There was significant improvement in loop security for Pretzel compared to SMC knot in unbacked case. Also elongation at failure in backed case is significantly lower for Pretzel compared to SMC whereas all other results were similar. Results showed that Pretzel knot may be safely used in arthroscopic surgeries and shows an improvement in loop security which gives an advantage in surgeries on pretensioned tissues.

[1]  J A Sidles,et al.  Optimizing arthroscopic knots. , 1995, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[2]  E. Buess,et al.  Open versus arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a comparative view of 96 cases. , 2005, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[3]  P J McMahon,et al.  Arthroscopic suture tying: A comparison of knot types and suture materials. , 2001, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[4]  M. Wirth,et al.  Cyclic loading of transosseous rotator cuff repairs: tension overload as a possible cause of failure. , 1997, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[5]  W D Cannon,et al.  Elongation of Arthroscopically Tied Knots , 1997, The American journal of sports medicine.

[6]  C Gerber,et al.  Mechanical strength of repairs of the rotator cuff. , 1994, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[7]  J. S. Kim,et al.  Significance of the internal locking mechanism for loop security enhancement in the arthroscopic knot. , 2001, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[8]  Philip C Noble,et al.  Cyclic testing of arthroscopic knot security. , 2004, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[9]  M. Surace,et al.  The double-twist knot: a new arthroscopic sliding knot. , 2002, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[10]  S S Burkhart,et al.  Loop security as a determinant of tissue fixation security. , 1998, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.