Action-orientated research and framework: insights from the French long-term social-ecological research network

Many social-ecological system(SES)-based approaches have been proposed to address environmental problems. Most social-ecological frameworks developed to date, however, lack clear operational linkages between humans and nature to efficiently guide SESs toward resilience. A conceptual framework designed to be operational is therefore necessary, as well as a network of research platforms with which to apply it. We defined explicit coupling processes that can be used as leverages to pilot an SES toward sustainability. We proposed to formalize an SES as a dynamic entity composed of two coupling interfaces, i.e., adaptive management and ecosystem services, both set within a landscape context to provide an actionable framework. These interfaces describe the way various actors, including scholars, benefit from and manage complex and changing interactions between the biophysical and social templates. Understanding the key processes underlying the interaction dynamics, especially those leveraging adaptive management processes, would help identify adaptive pathways for practices and collective actions, provide a crucial knowledge base for policy makers, and foster operationality as a requisite of an SES research agenda. Using several examples, we explained why long-term social-ecological research platforms provide an ideal operational network of research infrastructures to conduct place-based action-orientated research targeting the sustainability of SESs.

[1]  S. Gaba,et al.  Experimental quantification of insect pollination on sunflower yield, reconciling plant and field scale estimates , 2019, Basic and Applied Ecology.

[2]  Jean-Philippe Cointet,et al.  The place of agricultural sciences in the literature on ecosystem services , 2014 .

[3]  A. Loveridge,et al.  Water and cattle shape habitat selection by wild herbivores at the edge of a protected area , 2018 .

[4]  N. Lamouroux,et al.  The ecological restoration of large rivers needs science‐based, predictive tools meeting public expectations: an overview of the Rhône project , 2015 .

[5]  Vincent Bretagnolle,et al.  Weeds for bees? A review , 2015, Agronomy for Sustainable Development.

[6]  K. Arrow,et al.  Social-ecological systems as complex adaptive systems: modeling and policy implications , 2012, Environment and Development Economics.

[7]  E. Gosling,et al.  Connectedness to nature, place attachment and conservation behaviour: Testing connectedness theory among farmers , 2010 .

[8]  J. W. Bruce,et al.  The causes of land-use and land-cover change: moving beyond the myths , 2001 .

[9]  H. Fritz,et al.  Combining multi‐scale socio‐ecological approaches to understand the susceptibility of subsistence farmers to elephant crop raiding on the edge of a protected area , 2012 .

[10]  J. Löffler,et al.  Ecosystem services in coupled social–ecological systems: Closing the cycle of service provision and societal feedback , 2015, Ambio.

[11]  S. Gaba,et al.  Bees increase oilseed rape yield under real field conditions , 2018, Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment.

[12]  T. Lynam,et al.  Mental Models in Human–Environment Interactions: Theory, Policy Implications, and Methodological Explorations , 2012 .

[13]  Carl Folke,et al.  Weaving knowledge systems in IPBES, CBD and beyond—lessons learned for sustainability , 2017 .

[14]  C. S. Holling Understanding the Complexity of Economic, Ecological, and Social Systems , 2001, Ecosystems.

[15]  F. Chapin,et al.  Design principles for social‐ecological transformation toward sustainability: lessons from New Zealand sense of place , 2012 .

[16]  Erle C. Ellis,et al.  Anthropogenic transformation of the biomes, 1700 to 2000 , 2010 .

[17]  S. Polasky,et al.  Getting the measure of ecosystem services: a social–ecological approach , 2013 .

[18]  R. Cowling,et al.  An operational model for mainstreaming ecosystem services for implementation , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[19]  Simon Chamaillé-Jammes,et al.  Seasonal density estimates of common large herbivores in Hwange National Park, Zimbabwe , 2009 .

[20]  A.P.E. van Oudenhoven,et al.  UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) Ecosystem Services as a Contested Concept: A Synthesis of Critique and Counter-arguments Schötter, , 2014 .

[21]  W. Eberhard Falck,et al.  Selection of social demand-based indicators: EO-based indicators for mining , 2014 .

[22]  H. Fritz,et al.  Patterns and perceived sustainability of provisioning ecosystem services on the edge of a protected area in times of crisis , 2017 .

[23]  D. Lang,et al.  Ecosystem services as a boundary object for sustainability , 2014 .

[24]  O. Ragueneau,et al.  Knowledge and power in integrated coastal management. For a political anthropology of the sea combined with the sciences of the marine environment , 2017 .

[25]  C. Pahl-Wostl,et al.  Research, part of a Special Feature on A Framework for Analyzing, Comparing, and Diagnosing Social-Ecological Systems Comparison of Frameworks for Analyzing Social-ecological Systems , 2013 .

[26]  V. Bretagnolle,et al.  Analyzing the Design Process of Farming Practices Ensuring Little Bustard Conservation: Lessons for Collective Landscape Management , 2012 .

[27]  Christian K. Feld,et al.  Ecosystem services and biodiversity conservation: concepts and a glossary , 2010, Biodiversity and Conservation.

[28]  C. Patrick Doncaster,et al.  Safe and just operating spaces for regional social-ecological systems , 2014 .

[29]  A. Rissman,et al.  Where are Ecology and Biodiversity in Social–Ecological Systems Research? A Review of Research Methods and Applied Recommendations , 2017 .

[30]  E. Ostrom,et al.  Going beyond panaceas , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[31]  B. Chaffin,et al.  A Decade of Adaptive Governance Scholarship: Synthesis and Future Directions , 2014 .

[32]  Michael Mirtl,et al.  Development of LTSER Platforms in LTER-Europe: Challenges and Experiences in Implementing Place-Based Long-Term Socio-ecological Research in Selected Regions , 2013 .

[33]  J. Magnuson,et al.  An integrated conceptual framework for long‐term social–ecological research , 2011 .

[34]  A. Murwira,et al.  Consequences of animals crossing the edges of transfrontier parks , 2013 .

[35]  C. Folke,et al.  Adaptive Comanagement for Building Resilience in Social–Ecological Systems , 2004, Environmental management.

[36]  J. L. Gittleman,et al.  The biodiversity of species and their rates of extinction, distribution, and protection , 2014, Science.

[37]  Ralf Seppelt,et al.  Assessing ecosystem services for informing land-use decisions: a problem-oriented approach , 2015 .

[38]  E. Ostrom A General Framework for Analyzing Sustainability of Social-Ecological Systems , 2009, Science.

[39]  M. Maslin,et al.  Defining the Anthropocene , 2015, Nature.

[40]  G. Mace,et al.  REVIEW: Towards a risk register for natural capital , 2015, The Journal of applied ecology.

[41]  C. Folke RESILIENCE: THE EMERGENCE OF A PERSPECTIVE FOR SOCIAL-ECOLOGICAL SYSTEMS ANALYSES , 2006 .

[42]  H. Fritz,et al.  Climate‐driven fluctuations in surface‐water availability and the buffering role of artificial pumping in an African savanna: Potential implication for herbivore dynamics , 2007 .

[43]  W. Clark,et al.  Boundary work for sustainable development: Natural resource management at the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR) , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[44]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Theorizing Practice and Practicing Theory , 2011, Organ. Sci..

[45]  S. Gaba,et al.  Crop competition in winter wheat has a higher potential than farming practices to regulate weeds , 2018, Ecosphere.

[46]  Suneetha M. Subramanian,et al.  Research, part of a Special Feature on Sustaining Ecosystem Services in Cultural Landscapes: Analysis and Management Options Drivers of Change in Socio-Ecological Production Landscapes: Implications for Better Management , 2014 .

[47]  J. Spangenberg,et al.  Stakeholder involvement in ESS research and governance: Between conceptual ambition and practical experiences – risks, challenges and tested tools , 2015 .

[48]  Pierre Lascoumes,et al.  Introduction: Understanding Public Policy through Its Instruments—From the Nature of Instruments to the Sociology of Public Policy Instrumentation , 2007 .

[49]  K. Arrow,et al.  The Value of Nature and the Nature of Value , 2000, Science.

[50]  C. S. Holling,et al.  Resilience, experimentation, and scale mismatches in social-ecological landscapes , 2013, Landscape Ecology.

[51]  Natalie A. Jones,et al.  The study of human values in understanding and managing social-ecological systems , 2016 .

[52]  S. Rosenberg,et al.  Rethinking Democratic Deliberation: The Limits and Potential of Citizen Participation , 2007, Polity.

[53]  Y. Laurans,et al.  Use of ecosystem services economic valuation for decision making: questioning a literature blindspot. , 2013, Journal of environmental management.

[54]  Jarrett E. K. Byrnes,et al.  Linking Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services: Current Uncertainties and the Necessary Next Steps , 2014 .

[55]  E. Bonari,et al.  Landscape agronomy: a new field for addressing agricultural landscape dynamics , 2012, Landscape Ecology.

[56]  S. Levin Ecosystems and the Biosphere as Complex Adaptive Systems , 1998, Ecosystems.

[57]  R. Kansky,et al.  A wildlife tolerance model and case study for understanding human wildlife conflicts , 2016 .

[58]  E. Corbera,et al.  Ecosystem services, social interdependencies, and collective action: a conceptual framework , 2018 .

[59]  F. Brand,et al.  Focusing the Meaning(s) of Resilience: Resilience as a Descriptive Concept and a Boundary Object , 2007 .

[60]  J. T. Callahan Long-Term Ecological Research , 1984 .

[61]  S. Carpenter,et al.  Ecosystem stewardship: sustainability strategies for a rapidly changing planet. , 2010, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[62]  Erle C. Ellis Ecology in an anthropogenic biosphere , 2015 .

[63]  David Waltner-Toews,et al.  Perspective changes everything: managing ecosystems from the inside out , 2003 .

[64]  J. Norberg,et al.  ADAPTIVE GOVERNANCE OF SOCIAL-ECOLOGICAL SYSTEMS , 2005 .

[65]  I. C. Prentice,et al.  Transforming conservation science and practice for a postnormal world , 2017, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[66]  Garry D. Peterson,et al.  Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services. , 2009, Ecology letters.

[67]  A. Dufour,et al.  Insights for Integrated Conservation from Attitudes of People toward Protected Areas Near Hwange National Park, Zimbabwe , 2013, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[68]  G. Brady Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action , 1993 .

[69]  M. Loreau,et al.  Trade-offs in provisioning and stability of multiple ecosystem services in agroecosystems , 2018, bioRxiv.

[70]  J. Church Pathways of Adaptation to Climate Change: Analysis and Transformation of the Governance System of the Ardennes Mountain Area , 2018, Revue de géographie alpine.

[71]  P. Monestiez,et al.  Towards sustainable and multifunctional agriculture in farmland landscapes: Lessons from the integrative approach of a French LTSER platform. , 2018, The Science of the total environment.

[72]  S. Carpenter,et al.  Science for managing ecosystem services: Beyond the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[73]  R. Biggs,et al.  Mapping social–ecological systems: Identifying ‘green-loop’ and ‘red-loop’ dynamics based on characteristic bundles of ecosystem service use , 2015 .

[74]  Elinor Ostrom,et al.  A Framework to Analyze the Robustness of Social-ecological Systems from an Institutional Perspective , 2004 .

[75]  Jianguo Wu,et al.  A spatially explicit hierarchical approach to modeling complex ecological systems: theory and applications , 2002 .

[76]  How scientific visions matter: insights from three long-term socio-ecological research (LTSER) platforms under construction in Europe , 2012 .

[77]  E. Ostrom,et al.  Insight, part of a Special Feature on A Framework for Analyzing, Comparing, and Diagnosing Social-Ecological Systems Social-ecological system framework: initial changes and continuing challenges , 2014 .

[78]  Jacques Baudry,et al.  A social–ecological approach to managing multiple agro-ecosystem services , 2015 .

[79]  Timothy O'Riordan,et al.  Pursuing Sustainability: A Guide to the Science and Practice , 2016 .

[80]  S. Lavorel,et al.  Applying ecological knowledge to the innovative design of sustainable agroecosystems , 2018, Journal of Applied Ecology.

[81]  J. M. Grove,et al.  Integrating Social Science into the Long-Term Ecological Research (LTER) Network: Social Dimensions of Ecological Change and Ecological Dimensions of Social Change , 2004, Ecosystems.

[82]  M. Olson,et al.  The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. , 1973 .

[83]  G. Daily,et al.  Ecosystem Services in Decision Making: Time to Deliver , 2009 .

[84]  G. Kofinas Adaptive Co-management in Social-Ecological Governance , 2009 .

[85]  William R. Freudenburg,et al.  From LTER to LTSER: Conceptualizing the Socioeconomic Dimension of Long-term Socioecological Research , 2006 .