How can squint change the spacing of ocular dominance columns?

The pattern of ocular dominance columns in primary visual cortex of mammals such as cats and macaque monkeys arises during development by the activity-dependent refinement of thalamocortical connections. Manipulating visual experience in kittens by the induction of squint leads to the emergence of ocular dominance columns with a larger size and larger column-to-column spacing than in normally raised animals. The mechanism underlying this phenomenon is presently unknown. Theory suggests that experience cannot influence the spacing of columns if the development proceeds through purely Hebbian mechanisms. Here we study a developmental model in which Hebbian mechanisms are complemented by activity-dependent regulation of the total strength of afferent synapses converging onto a cortical neurone. We show that this model implies an influence of visual experience on the spacing of ocular dominance columns and provides a conceptually simple explanation for the emergence of larger sized columns in squinting animals. Assuming that during development cortical neurones become active in local groups, which we call co-activated cortical domains (CCDs), ocular dominance segregation is controlled by the size of these groups: (1) Size and spacing of ocular dominance columns are proportional to the size sigma of CCDs. (2) There is a critical size sigma* of CCDs such that ocular dominance columns form if sigmasigma*. This critical size of CCDs is determined by the correlation functions of activity patterns in the two eyes and specifies the influence of experience on ocular dominance segregation. We show that sigma* is larger with squint than with normal visual experience. Since experimental evidence indicates that the size of CCDs decreases during development, ocular dominance columns are predicted to form earlier and with a larger spacing in squinters compared to normal animals.

[1]  Y. Dudai.  Consolidation: Fragility on the Road to the Engram , 1996, Neuron.

[2]  C. Shatz,et al.  Developmental mechanisms that generate precise patterns of neuronal connectivity , 1993, Cell.

[3]  Eytan Domany,et al.  Models of Neural Networks I , 1991 .

[4]  G. Stent.  A physiological mechanism for Hebb's postulate of learning. , 1973, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  M. Stryker,et al.  Development of individual geniculocortical arbors in cat striate cortex and effects of binocular impulse blockade , 1993, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[6]  KD Miller.  A model for the development of simple cell receptive fields and the ordered arrangement of orientation columns through activity-dependent competition between ON- and OFF-center inputs , 1994, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[7]  P. Heggelund,et al.  Development of spatial receptive-field organization and orientation selectivity in kitten striate cortex. , 1985, Journal of neurophysiology.

[8]  M. Dalva,et al.  Rearrangements of synaptic connections in visual cortex revealed by laser photostimulation. , 1994, Science.

[9]  I. Ohzawa,et al.  Spatiotemporal organization of simple-cell receptive fields in the cat's striate cortex. I. General characteristics and postnatal development. , 1993, Journal of neurophysiology.

[10]  Kenneth D. Miller,et al.  The Role of Constraints in Hebbian Learning , 1994, Neural Computation.

[11]  K. Obermayer,et al.  Statistical-mechanical analysis of self-organization and pattern formation during the development of visual maps. , 1992, Physical review. A, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics.

[12]  Bauer,et al.  Phase diagrams of self-organizing maps. , 1996, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[13]  S. Levay,et al.  Ocular dominance columns and their development in layer IV of the cat's visual cortex: A quantitative study , 1978, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[14]  M. Weliky,et al.  Correlational structure of spontaneous neuronal activity in the developing lateral geniculate nucleus in vivo. , 1999, Science.

[15]  Dale Purves,et al.  Neural Activity And The Growth Of The Brain , 1994 .

[16]  Tobias Bonhoeffer,et al.  Development of identical orientation maps for two eyes without common visual experience , 1996, Nature.

[17]  E. Bienenstock,et al.  Theory for the development of neuron selectivity: orientation specificity and binocular interaction in visual cortex , 1982, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[18]  F. Wolf,et al.  Spontaneous pinwheel annihilation during visual development , 1998, Nature.

[19]  K. Miller,et al.  Synaptic Economics: Competition and Cooperation in Synaptic Plasticity , 1996, Neuron.

[20]  R. Kempter,et al.  Hebbian learning and spiking neurons , 1999 .

[21]  L. C. Katz,et al.  Emergence of functional circuits in ferret visual cortex visualized by optical imaging , 1995, Neuron.

[22]  N. Swindale.  The development of topography in the visual cortex: a review of models. , 1996, Network.

[23]  Klaus Schulten,et al.  Models of Orientation and Ocular Dominance Columns in the Visual Cortex: A Critical Comparison , 1995, Neural Computation.

[24]  D. Hubel,et al.  The pattern of ocular dominance columns in macaque visual cortex revealed by a reduced silver stain , 1975, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[25]  N. Swindale.  The development of topography in the visual cortex: a review of models. , 1996 .

[26]  R. C. Van Sluyters,et al.  The overall pattern of ocular dominance bands in cat visual cortex , 1988, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[27]  M. J. Friedlander,et al.  Development of Y‐axon innervation of cortical area 18 in the cat. , 1989, The Journal of physiology.

[28]  D. Hocking,et al.  An adult-like pattern of ocular dominance columns in striate cortex of newborn monkeys prior to visual experience , 1996, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[29]  Peter Dayan,et al.  Arbitrary Elastic Topologies and Ocular Dominance , 1993, Neural Computation.

[30]  D. Hubel,et al.  Ferrier lecture - Functional architecture of macaque monkey visual cortex , 1977, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[31]  H. Luhmann,et al.  Development of excitatory and inhibitory postsynaptic potentials in the rat neocortex. , 1995, Perspectives on developmental neurobiology.

[32]  N. Swindale.  A model for the formation of ocular dominance stripes , 1980, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[33]  Stephen José Hanson,et al.  Connectionist modeling and brain function : the developing interface , 1990 .

[34]  L. C. Katz,et al.  Development of ocular dominance columns in the absence of retinal input , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[35]  Tobias Bonhoeffer,et al.  Reverse occlusion leads to a precise restoration of orientation preference maps in visual cortex , 1994, Nature.

[36]  K. Miller,et al.  Ocular dominance column development: analysis and simulation. , 1989, Science.

[37]  T. Wiesel,et al.  Functional architecture of macaque monkey visual cortex , 1977 .

[38]  T. Wiesel,et al.  The distribution of afferents representing the right and left eyes in the cat's visual cortex , 1977, Brain Research.

[39]  M. Constantine-Paton,et al.  Patterned activity, synaptic convergence, and the NMDA receptor in developing visual pathways. , 1990, Annual review of neuroscience.

[40]  L. Abbott,et al.  Competitive Hebbian learning through spike-timing-dependent synaptic plasticity , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[41]  D. Hubel,et al.  Binocular interaction in striate cortex of kittens reared with artificial squint. , 1965, Journal of neurophysiology.

[42]  N. Tumosa,et al.  Alternating monocular exposure increases the spacing of ocularity domains in area 17 of cats , 1997, Visual Neuroscience.

[43]  Kenneth D. Miller,et al.  Derivation of Linear Hebbian Equations from a Nonlinear Hebbian Model of Synaptic Plasticity , 1990, Neural Computation.

[44]  M. Stryker,et al.  The role of visual experience in the development of columns in cat visual cortex. , 1998, Science.

[45]  F. Wolf,et al.  Sequential Bifurcation and Dynamic Rearrangement of Columnar Patterns during Cortical Development , .

[46]  Theo Geisel,et al.  Analysis of ocular dominance pattern formation in a high-dimensional self-organizing-map model , 1997 .

[47]  C. Shatz,et al.  Synaptic Activity and the Construction of Cortical Circuits , 1996, Science.

[48]  S Löwel,et al.  Ocular dominance column development: strabismus changes the spacing of adjacent columns in cat visual cortex. , 1994, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[49]  K. Miller.  Receptive Fields and Maps in the Visual Cortex: Models of Ocular Dominance and Orientation Columns* , 1996 .

[50]  James M. Bower,et al.  Computational Neuroscience: Trends in Research , 1996 .

[51]  J. Changeux,et al.  Selective stabilisation of developing synapses as a mechanism for the specification of neuronal networks , 1976, Nature.

[52]  S. Löwel,et al.  Early postnatal development of functional ocular dominance columns in cat primary visual cortex , 2000, Neuroreport.

[53]  F. Wolf,et al.  Theory of ocular dominance pattern formation. , 1999, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[54]  M. Stryker,et al.  Ocular dominance in layer IV of the cat's visual cortex and the effects of monocular deprivation. , 1978, The Journal of physiology.

[55]  I. Ohzawa,et al.  Local intracortical connections in the cat's visual cortex: postnatal development and plasticity. , 1994, Journal of neurophysiology.

[56]  L. C. Katz,et al.  Neuronal coupling and uncoupling in the developing nervous system , 1995, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.