Animated demonstrations and training wheels interfaces in a complex learning environment

Learning how to use a new software program can be a difficult and demanding task, especially for novices. There are several types of support for users exploring a software package. Animated demonstrations show how experts use an application, and training wheels interfaces offer a secure environment for exploration. To support different types of learners, external help should be adapted according to learner characteristics. The study presented in this article investigates effects of different support types in combination with the computer self-efficacy of learners. Young students (8th graders) were supported with text manuals, animated demonstrations, or animated demonstrations combined with a training wheels interface. In this context, they had to solve problems in physics and mathematics with a spreadsheet program. Results showed that animated demonstrations outperformed text manuals in many cases. Training wheels interfaces seemed to have disadvantages compared to unmodified user interfaces. In addition, motivational aspects have been investigated. Subjects with high computer self-efficacy scores were more motivated than their counterparts. Statistics (analysis of variance) revealed no interaction effects between the treatment and computer self-efficacy.

[1]  Joseph Krajcik,et al.  The design of guided learner-adaptable scaffolding in interactive learning environments , 1996, CHI.

[2]  David M. Lane,et al.  The use of animation in software training: Pitfalls and benefits. , 1997 .

[3]  Dorothy M. Chun,et al.  SUPPORTING VISUAL AND VERBAL LEARNING PREFERENCES IN A SECOND LANGUAGE MULTIMEDIA LEARNING ENVIRONMENT , 1998 .

[4]  E. Deci,et al.  Handbook of Self-Determination Research , 2002 .

[5]  Roberta M. Roth,et al.  Computer Self-Efficacy: A Practical Indicator of Student Computer Competency in Introductory IS Courses , 1998, Informing Sci. Int. J. an Emerg. Transdiscipl..

[6]  A. Bandura.  Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy.

[7]  Stephen J. Payne,et al.  Animated Demonstrations for Exploratory Learners , 1992, Interact. Comput..

[8]  R. Kelly Rainer,et al.  The Influence of Individual Differences on Skill in End-User Computing , 1992, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[9]  Slava Kalyuga,et al.  The Expertise Reversal Effect , 2003 .

[10]  George Palaigeorgiou,et al.  Students' Attitudes Towards Animated Demonstrations as Computer Learning Tools , 2007, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[11]  Susan Palmiter,et al.  Animated Demonstrations for Learning Procedural Computer-Based Tasks , 1993, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[12]  Richard Catrambone,et al.  Learning a word processing system with training wheels and guided exploration , 1987, CHI 1987.

[13]  A. Bandura.  Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. , 1977, Psychological review.

[14]  Peggy A. Ertmer,et al.  Enhancing self-efficacy for computer technologies through the use of positive classroom experiences , 1994 .

[15]  Simon. Messer,et al.  Recent research developments in learning technologies , 2006 .

[16]  S. Cassidy,et al.  Developing the Computer User Self-Efficacy (Cuse) Scale: Investigating the Relationship between Computer Self-Efficacy, Gender and Experience with Computers , 2002 .

[17]  Vincent Aleven,et al.  Toward Tutoring Help Seeking: Applying Cognitive Modeling to Meta-cognitive Skills , 2004, Intelligent Tutoring Systems.

[18]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  Multimedia Learning , 2001, Visible Learning Guide to Student Achievement.

[19]  Ulrik Schroeder,et al.  Supporting the Active Learning Process , 2006 .

[20]  B. Whitley.  Gender Differences in Computer-Related Attitudes and Behavior: A Meta-Analysis , 1997 .

[21]  Elizabeth M. Weiss,et al.  Computer self-efficacy and anxiety scales for an Internet sample: testing measurement equivalence of existing measures and development of new scales , 2004, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[22]  D. Schunk.  Social-self interaction and achievement behavior , 1999 .

[23]  Andrea L. Ames.  Just what they need, just when they need it: an introduction to embedded assistance , 2001, SIGDOC '01.

[24]  L. Resnick.  Learning In School and Out , 2008 .

[25]  Susan Palmiter,et al.  Animated Demonstrations vs Written Instructions for Learning Procedural Tasks: A Preliminary Investigation , 1991, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[26]  S. Owen,et al.  Development and Validation of the Computer Self-Efficacy Scale , 1989 .

[27]  Stephanie W. Haas,et al.  Evaluation of the govstat statistical interactive glossary: implications for just-in-time help , 2005, DG.O.

[28]  Norman Abeles,et al.  The Corsini encyclopedia of psychology and behavioral science , 2001 .

[29]  A. Collins,et al.  Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning , 1989 .

[30]  V. Aleven,et al.  Help Seeking and Help Design in Interactive Learning Environments , 2003 .

[31]  Rosemary Luckin,et al.  "Be bold and take a challenge": Could motivational strategies improve help-seeking? , 2005, AIED.

[32]  R. Catrambone.  The subgoal learning model: Creating better examples so that students can solve novel problems. , 1998 .

[33]  Neville A. Stanton,et al.  People and computers VII: Proceedings of the HCI'92 Conference, Septembr 1992 A Monk, D Diaper and M D Harrison, (eds) Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1992) £40.00, 534 pp., ISBN 0 521 44591 4 , 1993 .

[34]  Maria Bannert,et al.  The effects of training wheels and self-learning materials in software training , 2008, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[35]  Thomas Hill,et al.  Role of efficacy expectations in predicting the decision to use advanced technologies: The case of computers. , 1987 .

[36]  Deborah Compeau,et al.  Computer Self-Efficacy: Development of a Measure and Initial Test , 1995, MIS Q..

[37]  L. Resnick.  The 1987 Presidential Address Learning In School and Out , 1987 .

[38]  R. Mayer.  Should there be a three-strikes rule against pure discovery learning? The case for guided methods of instruction. , 2004, The American psychologist.

[39]  John M. Carroll,et al.  Blocking Learner Error States in a Training-Wheels System , 1984 .

[40]  Marilyn E. Gist,et al.  EFFECTS OF ALTERNATIVE TRAINING METHODS ON SELF-EFFICACY AND PERFORMANCE IN COMPUTER SOFTWARE TRAINING , 1989 .

[41]  I. Miura,et al.  The relationship of computer self-efficacy expectations to computer interest and course enrollment in college , 1987 .

[42]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Helping Users Get Started with Visual Interfaces: Multi-Layered Interfaces, Integrated Initial Guidance and Video Demonstrations , 2003, DG.O.

[43]  J.J.G. van Merrienboer,et al.  The end of software training , 2008 .

[44]  L. Resnick,et al.  Knowing, Learning, and Instruction , 2018 .

[45]  Ronald Baecker.  Showing instead of telling , 2002, SIGDOC '02.

[46]  Detlev Leutner.  Double-fading support - a training approach to complex software systems , 2000, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[47]  Mable B. Kinzie,et al.  Computer Technologies in Teacher Education: The Measurement of Attitudes and Self-Efficacy. , 1993 .

[48]  R. Mayer,et al.  Nine Ways to Reduce Cognitive Load in Multimedia Learning , 2003 .

[49]  Susan Palmiter.  The Effectiveness of Animated Demonstrations for Computer-based Tasks: a Summary, Model and Future Research , 1993, J. Vis. Lang. Comput..

[50]  Clarice P. Gressard,et al.  The Effects of Sex, Age, and Computer Experience on Computer Attitudes. , 1984 .

[51]  B. Zimmerman,et al.  Self-Efficacy: An Essential Motive to Learn. , 2000, Contemporary educational psychology.

[52]  G. Torkzadeh,et al.  Factorial Validity of a Computer Self-Efficacy Scale and the Impact of Computer Training , 1994 .

[53]  Lawrence M. Seiford,et al.  Microcomputer Users' Preferences for Software Documentation: An Analysis , 1988 .

[54]  Linda Allal,et al.  Situated cognition and learning: From conceptual frameworks to classroom investigations , 2018, Swiss Journal of Educational Research.

[55]  John M. Carroll,et al.  The Minimal Manual , 1987, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[56]  Ulrik Schroeder,et al.  Application of Qualitative Content Analysis in User-Program Interaction Research , 2005 .

[57]  E. Deci,et al.  Overview of self-determination theory: An organismic-dialectical perspective. , 2002 .

[58]  Addie Ehrenstein,et al.  Training for a rapidly changing workplace : applications of psychological research , 1997 .

[59]  D. Wood,et al.  Help seeking, learning and contingent tutoring , 1999, Comput. Educ..

[60]  Susan M. Harrison.  A comparison of still, animated, or nonillustrated on-line help with written or spoken instructions in a graphical user interface , 1995, CHI '95.

[61]  John M. Carroll,et al.  Training wheels in a user interface , 1984, CACM.

[62]  Lois Delcambre,et al.  Proceedings of the 2005 National Conference on Digital Government Research, DG.O 2005, Atlanta, Georgia, USA, May 15-18, 2005 , 2005, DG.O.

[63]  Claire O'Malley,et al.  Using animated demonstrations to teach graphics skills , 1993 .

[64]  John M. Carroll,et al.  Principles and Heuristics for Designing Minimalist Instruction , 1998 .

[65]  Susan E. Newman,et al.  Cognitive Apprenticeship: Teaching the Craft of Reading, Writing, and Mathematics. Technical Report No. 403. , 1987 .

[66]  Howard Margolis,et al.  Increasing struggling learners’ self‐efficacy: what tutors can do and say , 2005 .