The contribution of new particle formation and subsequent growth to haze formation

We investigated the contribution of atmospheric new particle formation (NPF) and subsequent growth of the newly formed particles, characterized by high concentrations of fine particulate matter (PM2.5). In addition to having adverse effects on visibility and human health, these haze particles may act as cloud condensation nuclei, having potentially large influences on clouds and precipitation. Using atmospheric observations performed in 2019 in Beijing, a polluted megacity in China, we showed that the variability of growth rates (GR) of particles originating from NPF depend only weakly on low-volatile vapor – highly oxidated organic molecules (HOMs) and sulphuric acid – concentrations and have no apparent connection with the strength of NPF or the level of background pollution. We then constrained aerosol dynamic model simulations with these observations. We showed that under conditions typical for the Beijing atmosphere, NPF is capable of contributing with more than 100 μg m−3 to the PM2.5 mass concentration and simultaneously >103 cm−3 to the haze particle (diameter > 100 nm) number concentration. Our simulations reveal that the PM2.5 mass concentration originating from NPF, strength of NPF, particle growth rate and pre-existing background particle population are all connected with each other. Concerning the PM pollution control, our results indicate that reducing primary particle emissions might not result in an effective enough decrease in total PM2.5 mass concentrations until a reduction in emissions of precursor compounds for NPF and subsequent particle growth is imposed.

[1]  Q. Xiao,et al.  Separating emission and meteorological contributions to long-term PM2.5 trends over eastern China during 2000–2018 , 2021, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.

[2]  Yuesi Wang,et al.  Chemistry of new particle formation and growth events during wintertime in suburban area of Beijing: Insights from highly polluted atmosphere , 2021 .

[3]  Y. Rudich,et al.  High Pressure Inside Nanometer-Sized Particles Influences the Rate and Products of Chemical Reactions. , 2021, Environmental science & technology.

[4]  Junying Sun,et al.  Enhancement of nanoparticle formation and growth during the COVID-19 lockdown period in urban Beijing , 2021, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.

[5]  M. Shao,et al.  Impacts of Extreme Air Pollution Meteorology on Air Quality in China , 2021, Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres.

[6]  T. Petäjä,et al.  The Synergistic Role of Sulfuric Acid, Bases, and Oxidized Organics Governing New‐Particle Formation in Beijing , 2021, Geophysical Research Letters.

[7]  A. Ding,et al.  Is reducing new particle formation a plausible solution to mitigate particulate air pollution in Beijing and other Chinese megacities? , 2020, Faraday discussions.

[8]  A. Ding,et al.  Seasonal Characteristics of New Particle Formation and Growth in Urban Beijing. , 2020, Environmental science & technology.

[9]  Ke Ding,et al.  Amplified transboundary transport of haze by aerosol–boundary layer interaction in China , 2020, Nature Geoscience.

[10]  T. Petäjä,et al.  Size-resolved particle number emissions in Beijing determined from measured particle size distributions , 2020, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.

[11]  Bin Zhao,et al.  Responses of gaseous sulfuric acid and particulate sulfate to reduced SO2 concentration: A perspective from long-term measurements in Beijing. , 2020, The Science of the total environment.

[12]  J. Apte,et al.  Particle number concentrations and size distribution in a polluted megacity: the Delhi Aerosol Supersite study , 2020, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.

[13]  K. Lehtinen,et al.  Formation and growth of sub-3-nm aerosol particles in experimental chambers , 2020, Nature Protocols.

[14]  T. Petäjä,et al.  Variation of size-segregated particle number concentrations in wintertime Beijing , 2020 .

[15]  Qiang Zhang,et al.  Decadal changes in anthropogenic source contribution of PM2.5 pollution and related health impacts in China, 1990–2015 , 2019, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.

[16]  E. Ray,et al.  A large source of cloud condensation nuclei from new particle formation in the tropics , 2019, Nature.

[17]  Weijian Zhou,et al.  Severe haze in northern China: A synergy of anthropogenic emissions and atmospheric processes , 2019, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[18]  Jizhi Wang,et al.  The two-way feedback mechanism between unfavorable meteorological conditions and cumulative aerosol pollution in various haze regions of China , 2019, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.

[19]  T. Petäjä,et al.  Atmospheric new particle formation in China , 2018, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.

[20]  Zhong Ma,et al.  Spatial-temporal patterns of PM2.5 concentrations for 338 Chinese cities. , 2018, The Science of the total environment.

[21]  Jun Zheng,et al.  Atmospheric new particle formation from sulfuric acid and amines in a Chinese megacity , 2018, Science.

[22]  A. Ding,et al.  Atmospheric gas-to-particle conversion: why NPF events are observed in megacities? , 2017, Faraday discussions.

[23]  Hongliang Zhang,et al.  Premature Mortality Attributable to Particulate Matter in China: Source Contributions and Responses to Reductions. , 2017, Environmental science & technology.

[24]  Liisa Pirjola,et al.  Traffic is a major source of atmospheric nanocluster aerosol , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[25]  Jiming Hao,et al.  Particulate matter pollution over China and the effects of control policies. , 2017, The Science of the total environment.

[26]  J. Hao,et al.  A miniature cylindrical differential mobility analyzer for sub-3 nm particle sizing , 2017 .

[27]  Tong Zhu,et al.  Enhanced haze pollution by black carbon in megacities in China , 2016 .

[28]  A. Ding,et al.  Enhanced air pollution via aerosol-boundary layer feedback in China , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[29]  A. Ding,et al.  Aerosol size distribution and new particle formation in the western Yangtze River Delta of China: 2 years of measurements at the SORPES station , 2015 .

[30]  M. Kulmala Atmospheric chemistry: China’s choking cocktail , 2015, Nature.

[31]  M. Molina,et al.  Elucidating severe urban haze formation in China , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[32]  Prashant Kumar,et al.  Submicron aerosols at thirteen diversified sites in China: size distribution, new particle formation and corresponding contribution to cloud condensation nuclei production , 2014 .

[33]  A. Piazzalunga,et al.  High secondary aerosol contribution to particulate pollution during haze events in China , 2014, Nature.

[34]  T. Petäjä,et al.  Methods for determining particle size distribution and growth rates between 1 and 3 nm using the Particle Size Magnifier , 2014 .

[35]  Dingli Yue,et al.  Characteristics of regional new particle formation in urban and regional background environments in the North China Plain , 2013 .

[36]  A. Ding,et al.  Aerosols and nucleation in eastern China: first insights from the new SORPES-NJU station , 2013 .

[37]  Miikka Dal Maso,et al.  Measurement of the nucleation of atmospheric aerosol particles , 2012, Nature Protocols.

[38]  Douglas R. Worsnop,et al.  The contribution of organics to atmospheric nanoparticle growth , 2012 .

[39]  A. Mirme,et al.  The mathematical principles and design of the NAIS – a spectrometer for the measurement of cluster ion and nanometer aerosol size distributions , 2011 .

[40]  Peter H. McMurry,et al.  Electrical Mobility Spectrometer Using a Diethylene Glycol Condensation Particle Counter for Measurement of Aerosol Size Distributions Down to 1 nm , 2011 .

[41]  K. Lehtinen,et al.  Parameterizing the formation rate of new particles: The effect of nuclei self-coagulation , 2010 .

[42]  Tong Zhu,et al.  The roles of sulfuric acid in new particle formation and growth in the mega-city of Beijing , 2010 .

[43]  Renyi Zhang,et al.  Atmospheric nanoparticles formed from heterogeneous reactions of organics , 2010 .

[44]  Dingli Yue,et al.  Characteristics of aerosol size distributions and new particle formation in the summer in Beijing , 2009 .

[45]  K. Lehtinen,et al.  Estimating nucleation rates from apparent particle formation rates and vice versa: Revised formulation of the Kerminen–Kulmala equation , 2007 .

[46]  T. Petäjä,et al.  New particle formation in Beijing, China: Statistical analysis of a 1‐year data set , 2007 .

[47]  P. Adams,et al.  Efficiency of cloud condensation nuclei formation from ultrafine particles , 2006 .

[48]  K. Lehtinen,et al.  Dynamics of atmospheric nucleation mode particles: a timescale analysis , 2004 .

[49]  M. Kulmala,et al.  Analytical formulae connecting the “real” and the “apparent” nucleation rate and the nuclei number concentration for atmospheric nucleation events , 2002 .

[50]  S. Choate,et al.  Statistical description of the size properties of non uniform particulate substances , 1929 .

[51]  Jingkun Jiang,et al.  Supplementary Information Theoretical and experimental analysis of the core sampling method: reducing diffusional losses in aerosol sampling line , 2019 .