Lexical Information from a Minimalist Point of View

Simplicity as a methodological orientation applies to linguistic theory just as to any other field of research: ‘Occam’s razor’ is the label for the basic heuristic maxim according to which an adequate analysis must ultimately be reduced to indispensible specifications. In this sense, conceptual economy has been a strict and stimulating guideline in the development of Generative Grammar from the very beginning. Halle’s (1959) argument discarding the level of taxonomic phonemics in order to unify two otherwise separate phonological processes is an early characteristic example; a more general notion is that of an evaluation metric introduced in Chomsky (1957, 1975), which relates the relative simplicity of alternative linguistic descriptions systematically to the quest for explanatory adequacy of the theory underlying the descriptions to be evaluated. Further proposals along these lines include the theory of markedness developed in Chomsky and Halle (1968), Kean (1975, 1981), and others, the notion of underspecification proposed e.g. in Archangeli (1984), Farkas (1990), the concept of default values and related notions. An important step promoting this general orientation was the idea of Principles and Parameters developed in Chomsky (1981, 1986), which reduced the notion of language particular rule systems to universal principles, subject merely to parametrization with restricted options, largely related to properties of particular lexical items. On this account, the notion of a simplicity metric is to be dispensed with, as competing analyses of relevant data are now supposed to be essentially excluded by the restrictive system of principles.

[1]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  Lectures on Government and Binding , 1981 .

[2]  D. Bickerton Language and Human Behavior , 1996 .

[3]  E. Williams Argument Structure and Morphology , 1981 .

[4]  S. Pinker The Language Instinct , 1994 .

[5]  J. Barwise,et al.  Generalized quantifiers and natural language , 1981 .

[6]  Uriel Weinreich,et al.  On semantics , 1980 .

[7]  Noam Chomsky A minimalist program for linguistic theory , 1992 .

[8]  P. Garvin,et al.  Prolegomena to a Theory of Language , 1953 .

[9]  David M. Perlmutter SONORITY AND SYLLABLE STRUCTURE IN AMERICAN SIGN LANGUAGE , 1993 .

[10]  Morris Halle,et al.  Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection , 1993 .

[11]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  The Minimalist Program , 1992 .

[12]  David R. Dowty,et al.  Word Meaning and Montague Grammar , 1979 .

[13]  D. Archangeli Underspecification in Yawelmani phonology and morphology , 1984 .

[14]  D. Pesetsky Morphology and logical form , 1985 .

[15]  D. Farkas Two cases of underspecification in morphology , 1990 .

[16]  Max J. Cresswell,et al.  Logics and languages , 1973 .

[17]  W. Levelt,et al.  Speaking: From Intention to Articulation , 1990 .

[18]  C. Fabricius-Hansen,et al.  Studien über das deutsche Verbum infinitum , 1958 .

[19]  Ken Hale,et al.  On Argument Structure and the Lexical Expression of Syntactic Relations , 1993 .

[20]  S. Anderson The Logical Structure of Linguistic Theory , 2009 .

[21]  Masayoshi Shibatani,et al.  Three Reasons for Not Deriving ‘Kill’ from ‘Cause to Die’ in Japanese , 1972 .

[22]  D. Wunderlich How do prepositional phrases fit into compositional syntax and semantics? , 1991 .

[23]  Noam Chomsky Some notes on economy of derivation and representation , 2013 .

[24]  Noam Chomsky Language and Nature , 1995 .

[25]  Noam Chomsky Knowledge of Language , 1986 .

[26]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  The Sound Pattern of English , 1968 .