Conformational Heterogeneity of Unbound Proteins Enhances Recognition in Protein-Protein Encounters.

To understand cellular processes at the molecular level we need to improve our knowledge of protein-protein interactions, from a structural, mechanistic, and energetic point of view. Current theoretical studies and computational docking simulations show that protein dynamics plays a key role in protein association and support the need for including protein flexibility in modeling protein interactions. Assuming the conformational selection binding mechanism, in which the unbound state can sample bound conformers, one possible strategy to include flexibility in docking predictions would be the use of conformational ensembles originated from unbound protein structures. Here we present an exhaustive computational study about the use of precomputed unbound ensembles in the context of protein docking, performed on a set of 124 cases of the Protein-Protein Docking Benchmark 3.0. Conformational ensembles were generated by conformational optimization and refinement with MODELLER and by short molecular dynamics trajectories with AMBER. We identified those conformers providing optimal binding and investigated the role of protein conformational heterogeneity in protein-protein recognition. Our results show that a restricted conformational refinement can generate conformers with better binding properties and improve docking encounters in medium-flexible cases. For more flexible cases, a more extended conformational sampling based on Normal Mode Analysis was proven helpful. We found that successful conformers provide better energetic complementarity to the docking partners, which is compatible with recent views of binding association. In addition to the mechanistic considerations, these findings could be exploited for practical docking predictions of improved efficiency.

[1]  Sergey Lyskov,et al.  The RosettaDock server for local protein–protein docking , 2008, Nucleic Acids Res..

[2]  R. Nussinov,et al.  The role of dynamic conformational ensembles in biomolecular recognition. , 2009, Nature chemical biology.

[3]  P. Bisch,et al.  Exploring free energy landscapes of large conformational changes: molecular dynamics with excited normal modes. , 2015, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[4]  Solène Grosdidier,et al.  Expanding the frontiers of protein–protein modeling: From docking and scoring to binding affinity predictions and other challenges , 2013, Proteins.

[5]  Z. Weng,et al.  Protein–protein docking benchmark version 3.0 , 2008, Proteins.

[6]  K. Hinsen Analysis of domain motions by approximate normal mode calculations , 1998, Proteins.

[7]  Modesto Orozco,et al.  MoDEL (Molecular Dynamics Extended Library): a database of atomistic molecular dynamics trajectories. , 2010, Structure.

[8]  P. Kollman,et al.  Automatic atom type and bond type perception in molecular mechanical calculations. , 2006, Journal of molecular graphics & modelling.

[9]  Ruben Abagyan,et al.  Disseminating structural genomics data to the public: from a data dump to an animated story. , 2006, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[10]  J. Fernández-Recio,et al.  Validated Conformational Ensembles Are Key for the Successful Prediction of Protein Complexes. , 2013, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[11]  M. Y. Lobanov,et al.  Comparison of X‐ray and NMR structures: Is there a systematic difference in residue contacts between X‐ray‐ and NMR‐resolved protein structures? , 2005, Proteins.

[12]  Richard Lavery,et al.  Docking macromolecules with flexible segments , 2003, J. Comput. Chem..

[13]  M. Zacharias,et al.  Accounting for loop flexibility during protein–protein docking , 2005, Proteins.

[14]  B. Alberts The Cell as a Collection of Protein Machines: Preparing the Next Generation of Molecular Biologists , 1998, Cell.

[15]  Holger Gohlke,et al.  The Amber biomolecular simulation programs , 2005, J. Comput. Chem..

[16]  R. Dror,et al.  Improved side-chain torsion potentials for the Amber ff99SB protein force field , 2010, Proteins.

[17]  Carles Pons,et al.  Scoring by Intermolecular Pairwise Propensities of Exposed Residues (SIPPER): A New Efficient Potential for Protein-Protein Docking , 2011, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[18]  C. Dominguez,et al.  HADDOCK: a protein-protein docking approach based on biochemical or biophysical information. , 2003, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[19]  Martin Zacharias,et al.  Protein–protein docking with a reduced protein model accounting for side‐chain flexibility , 2003, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[20]  R. Nussinov,et al.  Folding funnels and binding mechanisms. , 1999, Protein engineering.

[21]  H. Lehrach,et al.  A Human Protein-Protein Interaction Network: A Resource for Annotating the Proteome , 2005, Cell.

[22]  Tirion,et al.  Large Amplitude Elastic Motions in Proteins from a Single-Parameter, Atomic Analysis. , 1996, Physical review letters.

[23]  D. Ritchie,et al.  Protein docking using spherical polar Fourier correlations , 2000, Proteins.

[24]  E. Katchalski‐Katzir,et al.  Molecular surface recognition: determination of geometric fit between proteins and their ligands by correlation techniques. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  A. Laio,et al.  Escaping free-energy minima , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[26]  Martin Zacharias,et al.  Rapid protein–ligand docking using soft modes from molecular dynamics simulations to account for protein deformability: Binding of FK506 to FKBP , 2004, Proteins.

[27]  D. Kern,et al.  Hidden alternate structures of proline isomerase essential for catalysis , 2010 .

[28]  R. Abagyan,et al.  Predictions of protein flexibility: First‐order measures , 2004, Proteins.

[29]  Ruth Nussinov,et al.  PatchDock and SymmDock: servers for rigid and symmetric docking , 2005, Nucleic Acids Res..

[30]  M. Sternberg,et al.  The relationship between the flexibility of proteins and their conformational states on forming protein-protein complexes with an application to protein-protein docking. , 2005, Journal of molecular biology.

[31]  Ron Elber,et al.  PIE—Efficient filters and coarse grained potentials for unbound protein–protein docking , 2010, Proteins.

[32]  Yang Zhang,et al.  Template-based structure modeling of protein-protein interactions. , 2014, Current opinion in structural biology.

[33]  Rolf Boelens,et al.  Information-driven protein–DNA docking using HADDOCK: it is a matter of flexibility , 2006, Nucleic acids research.

[34]  H. Wolfson,et al.  FiberDock: Flexible induced‐fit backbone refinement in molecular docking , 2010, Proteins.

[35]  Huan‐Xiang Zhou From induced fit to conformational selection: a continuum of binding mechanism controlled by the timescale of conformational transitions. , 2010, Biophysical journal.

[36]  R. Nussinov,et al.  Folding and binding cascades: shifts in energy landscapes. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[37]  Ruben Abagyan,et al.  FRODOCK: a new approach for fast rotational protein-protein docking , 2009, Bioinform..

[38]  Zhengwei Zhu,et al.  Templates are available to model nearly all complexes of structurally characterized proteins , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[39]  Daniel M Zuckerman,et al.  On the structural convergence of biomolecular simulations by determination of the effective sample size. , 2007, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[40]  Ilya A Vakser,et al.  Global and local structural similarity in protein–protein complexes: Implications for template‐based docking , 2013, Proteins.

[41]  Stephen R. Comeau,et al.  PIPER: An FFT‐based protein docking program with pairwise potentials , 2006, Proteins.

[42]  Ben M. Webb,et al.  Comparative Protein Structure Modeling Using Modeller , 2006, Current protocols in bioinformatics.

[43]  M. Nilges,et al.  Complementarity of structure ensembles in protein-protein binding. , 2004, Structure.

[44]  Jeffrey J. Gray,et al.  Conformer selection and induced fit in flexible backbone protein-protein docking using computational and NMR ensembles. , 2008, Journal of molecular biology.

[45]  Iain H. Moal,et al.  Kinetic Rate Constant Prediction Supports the Conformational Selection Mechanism of Protein Binding , 2012, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[46]  T. Blundell,et al.  Comparative protein modelling by satisfaction of spatial restraints. , 1993, Journal of molecular biology.

[47]  D E Wemmer,et al.  Two-state allosteric behavior in a single-domain signaling protein. , 2001, Science.

[48]  Marc F Lensink,et al.  Docking, scoring, and affinity prediction in CAPRI , 2013, Proteins.

[49]  C. Milstein,et al.  Conformational isomerism and the diversity of antibodies. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[50]  P. Chacón,et al.  Thorough validation of protein normal mode analysis: a comparative study with essential dynamics. , 2007, Structure.

[51]  Carles Pons,et al.  Present and future challenges and limitations in protein–protein docking , 2010, Proteins.

[52]  R. Abagyan,et al.  Soft protein–protein docking in internal coordinates , 2002, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[53]  P. Kollman,et al.  A modified version of the Cornell et al. force field with improved sugar pucker phases and helical repeat. , 1999, Journal of biomolecular structure & dynamics.

[54]  P. Aloy,et al.  Interactome3D: adding structural details to protein networks , 2013, Nature Methods.

[55]  Y. Sugita,et al.  Replica-exchange molecular dynamics method for protein folding , 1999 .

[56]  P. Aloy,et al.  A systematic study of the energetics involved in structural changes upon association and connectivity in protein interaction networks. , 2011, Structure.

[57]  Andrey Tovchigrechko,et al.  GRAMM-X public web server for protein–protein docking , 2006, Nucleic Acids Res..

[58]  R. Abagyan,et al.  ICM‐DISCO docking by global energy optimization with fully flexible side‐chains , 2003, Proteins.

[59]  S. L. Wong,et al.  Towards a proteome-scale map of the human protein–protein interaction network , 2005, Nature.

[60]  R. Jernigan,et al.  Anisotropy of fluctuation dynamics of proteins with an elastic network model. , 2001, Biophysical journal.

[61]  M. Sternberg,et al.  Modelling protein docking using shape complementarity, electrostatics and biochemical information. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.

[62]  P. Bates,et al.  SwarmDock and the Use of Normal Modes in Protein-Protein Docking , 2010, International journal of molecular sciences.

[63]  Tammy M. K. Cheng,et al.  pyDock: Electrostatics and desolvation for effective scoring of rigid‐body protein–protein docking , 2007, Proteins.

[64]  R. Nussinov,et al.  Induced Fit, Conformational Selection and Independent Dynamic Segments: an Extended View of Binding Events Opinion , 2022 .

[65]  Z. Weng,et al.  ZDOCK: An initial‐stage protein‐docking algorithm , 2003, Proteins.