Measuring emotion perception following traumatic brain injury: The Complex Audio Visual Emotion Assessment Task (CAVEAT)

ABSTRACT Introduction: While emotion recognition difficulties in moderate-severe TBI are well established, the standard measures of emotion recognition significantly limit the conclusions which can be drawn regarding real-life deficits. Two studies report on the development of CAVEAT, a new measure of emotion recognition that attempts to overcome these limitations. Method: These studies were designed to establish CAVEAT's psychometric properties by examining performance of a TBI group and matched controls in order to provide estimates of its reliability and validity (study 1), and to compare performance of the TBI and control groups on a subgroup of emotions from the CAVEAT that represented the six basic emotions used in conventional emotion research (study 2). Thirty-two participants with TBI and 32 matched controls (study 1) and 16 participants with TBI and 12 matched controls (study 2) participated in this study. Results: CAVEAT demonstrated high construct validity and internal consistency. Performance on the subgroup of “basic” six emotions was largely similar to the rates reported in the literature. Conclusions: These findings provided some evidence for the psychometric properties of CAVEAT, indicating that it can be used as a clinical test for assessing emotion recognition in people with moderate-severe TBI.

[1]  Skye McDonald,et al.  Social perception deficits after traumatic brain injury: interaction between emotion recognition, mentalizing ability, and social communication. , 2004, Neuropsychology.

[2]  Barbra Zupan,et al.  Overview of impaired facial affect recognition in persons with traumatic brain injury , 2007, Brain injury.

[3]  Gary R Turner,et al.  Deficits in facial emotion perception in adults with recent traumatic brain injury , 2004, Neuropsychologia.

[4]  Skye McDonald,et al.  The ecological validity of TASIT: A test of social perception , 2004 .

[5]  J. Douglas,et al.  Long-term ability to interpret facial expression after traumatic brain injury and its relation to social integration , 2009, Brain and Cognition.

[6]  S. McDonald New Frontiers in Neuropsychological Assessment: Assessing Social Perception Using a Standardised Instrument, The Awareness of Social Inference Test , 2012 .

[7]  Shir Tragash,et al.  reading the mind in the eyes , 2018 .

[8]  Nigel W. Bond,et al.  A new series of slides depicting facial expressions of affect: A comparison with the pictures of facial affect series , 1993 .

[9]  J. J. Ryan,et al.  Scoring Reliability on the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Third Edition (WAIS-III) , 2003, Assessment.

[10]  S. McDonald Traumatic Brain Injury and Psychosocial Function: Let's Get Social , 2003, Brain Impairment.

[11]  S. McDonald,et al.  Emotion perception deficits following traumatic brain injury: A review of the evidence and rationale for intervention , 2008, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society.

[12]  M. Coltheart,et al.  Photographs of facial expression: Accuracy, response times, and ratings of intensity , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[13]  Benjamin F. Rodriguez,et al.  Psychometric Properties , 2009 .

[14]  H. Levin,et al.  Benton Controlled Oral Word Association Test: reliability and updated norms. , 1996, Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists.

[15]  S. Baron-Cohen,et al.  The "Reading the Mind in the Eyes" Test revised version: a study with normal adults, and adults with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism. , 2001, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[16]  J. Langlois,et al.  The Epidemiology and Impact of Traumatic Brain Injury: A Brief Overview , 2006, The Journal of head trauma rehabilitation.

[17]  S Z Rapcsak,et al.  Fear recognition deficits after focal brain damage: a cautionary note. , 2000, Neurology.

[18]  R. Tate,et al.  A randomised controlled trial evaluating a brief intervention for deficits in recognising emotional prosody following severe ABI , 2013, Neuropsychological rehabilitation.

[19]  K. Prkachin,et al.  Is pain the price of empathy? The perception of others' pain in patients with congenital insensitivity to pain. , 2006, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[20]  R. Bagby,et al.  The twenty-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale--I. Item selection and cross-validation of the factor structure. , 1994, Journal of psychosomatic research.

[21]  Sylvia D. Kreibig,et al.  Autonomic nervous system activity in emotion: A review , 2010, Biological Psychology.

[22]  P. Eslinger,et al.  Empathy and social‐emotional factors in recovery from stroke , 2002, Current opinion in neurology.

[23]  M. Tomita,et al.  Training Emotional Processing in Persons With Brain Injury , 2009, The Journal of head trauma rehabilitation.

[24]  V. Croker,et al.  Recognition of emotion from facial expression following traumatic brain injury , 2005, Brain injury.

[25]  L. Calvó-Perxas,et al.  The Trail Making Test , 2017, Assessment (Odessa, Fla.).

[26]  R. Bajcsy,et al.  A method for obtaining 3-dimensional facial expressions and its standardization for use in neurocognitive studies , 2002, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[27]  Tim Shallice,et al.  The Hayling and Brixton Tests , 1997 .

[28]  P J Donovick,et al.  Traumatic brain injury (TBI) 10-20 years later: a comprehensive outcome study of psychiatric symptomatology, cognitive abilities and psychosocial functioning. , 2001, Brain injury.

[29]  I. V. Thomsen,et al.  Late outcome of very severe blunt head trauma: a 10-15 year second follow-up. , 1984, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[30]  N. Tallent Psychological testing. , 1960, The American journal of nursing.

[31]  J. Russell Is there universal recognition of emotion from facial expression? A review of the cross-cultural studies. , 1994, Psychological bulletin.

[32]  S. Segalowitz,et al.  Altered electrodermal response to facial expression after closed head injury , 2002, Brain injury.

[33]  David Shum,et al.  Reliability and validity of The Awareness of Social Inference Test (TASIT): A clinical test of social perception , 2006, Disability and rehabilitation.

[34]  Natalie C. Ebner,et al.  FACES—A database of facial expressions in young, middle-aged, and older women and men: Development and validation , 2010, Behavior research methods.

[35]  A. Ortony,et al.  What's basic about basic emotions? , 1990, Psychological review.

[36]  J. Henry,et al.  Emotion perception and Alexithymia in people with severe traumatic brain injury: One disorder or two?: A preliminary investigation , 2011 .

[37]  T. Dalgleish Basic Emotions , 2004 .

[38]  T. Abma,et al.  Acquired brain injury , 2010, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[39]  Barbra Zupan,et al.  Affect Recognition in Traumatic Brain Injury: Responses to Unimodal and Multimodal Media , 2014, The Journal of head trauma rehabilitation.

[40]  P. Yates Psychological adjustment, social enablement and community integration following acquired brain injury , 2003, Neuropsychological rehabilitation.

[41]  P. Ekman,et al.  Matsumoto and Ekman's Japanese and Caucasian Facial Expressions of Emotion (JACFEE): Reliability Data and Cross-National Differences , 1997 .

[42]  J. Russell Forced-choice response format in the study of facial expression , 1993 .

[43]  E. Frank,et al.  Recognition of Nonverbal Communication of Affect Following Traumatic Brain Injury , 2000 .

[44]  Skye McDonald,et al.  TASIT: A New Clinical Tool for Assessing Social Perception After Traumatic Brain Injury , 2003, The Journal of head trauma rehabilitation.

[45]  R. Bagby,et al.  The 20-Item Toronto Alexithymia Scale: IV. Reliability and factorial validity in different languages and cultures , 2003 .

[46]  D. Lundqvist,et al.  Facial expressions of emotion (KDEF): Identification under different display-duration conditions , 2008, Behavior research methods.

[47]  Daniel N. Allen,et al.  Trail-Making Test , 2010 .

[48]  Claire Williams,et al.  Inability to empathize following traumatic brain injury , 2008, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society.

[49]  D. Wechsler Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale--Third Edition , 2019 .

[50]  P. Ekman Pictures of Facial Affect , 1976 .

[51]  J. N. Bassili Facial motion in the perception of faces and of emotional expression. , 1978, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[52]  S. McDonald,et al.  Amused, flirting or simply baffled? Is recognition of all emotions affected by traumatic brain injury? , 2018, Journal of neuropsychology.

[53]  M. Tomita,et al.  Meta-analysis of facial affect recognition difficulties after traumatic brain injury. , 2011, Neuropsychology.

[54]  E. Rolls,et al.  Face and voice expression identification in patients with emotional and behavioural changes following ventral frontal lobe damage , 1996, Neuropsychologia.

[55]  M. Milders,et al.  Neuropsychological Impairments and Changes in Emotional and Social Behaviour Following Severe Traumatic Brain Injury , 2003, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[56]  Claire Williams,et al.  Alexithymia and emotional empathy following traumatic brain injury , 2010, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[57]  Colin W. G. Clifford,et al.  Perceptual categorisation of anti- expressions , 2010 .

[58]  T. Brown,et al.  Psychometric properties of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS) in clinical samples. , 1997, Behaviour research and therapy.

[59]  Darren George,et al.  SPSS for Windows Step by Step: A Simple Guide and Reference , 1998 .

[60]  G J Taylor,et al.  The Twenty-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale--II. Convergent, discriminant, and concurrent validity. , 1994, Journal of psychosomatic research.

[61]  J. Henry,et al.  The short-form version of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS-21): construct validity and normative data in a large non-clinical sample. , 2005, The British journal of clinical psychology.

[62]  Albert Mehrabian,et al.  Relations among personality scales of aggression, violence, and empathy: Validational evidence bearing on the risk of eruptive violence scale , 1997 .