Non contact measurement of vibration using airborne ultrasound

A non contact ultrasonic method for measuring the surface vibration of objects is studied. The instrument consists in a pair of 420 kHz air transducer. One is used to emit ultrasound toward the moving surface while the other receives the ultrasound reflected from the object under test. Two effects induce a phase modulation on the received signal. The first results from the variation of the round trip time interval /spl tau/ required for the wavefront to go from the emitter to the moving surface and back to the receiver. This is the Doppler effect directly proportional to the surface displacement. The second one results from the nonlinear parametric interactions of the ultrasonic beams (forward and backward) with the low frequency sound field emitted in the air by the vibrating surface. This latter phenomenon, which is a volume effect, is proportional to the low frequency field and then to the surface velocity. The relative contribution of Doppler and parametric effects are evaluated, and it is shown that both have to be taken into account when sensing broadband vibrations in the air.

[1]  D. Censor Scattering by time varying obstacles , 1972 .

[2]  M. Cox,et al.  Automated Noninvasive Motion Measurement of Auditory Organs in Fish Using Ultrasound , 1987 .

[3]  O. Casula,et al.  An ultrasonic phase sensitive method for surface velocity measurements in a liquid , 1996, 1996 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium. Proceedings.

[4]  Analysis of Vibrating Surfaces Using Acoustic Holography , 1982 .

[5]  D. Censor Acoustical Doppler effect analysis—Is it a valid method? , 1988 .

[6]  Enrique Barbieri,et al.  An ultrasonic ranging system for structural vibration measurements , 1991 .

[7]  P. J. Westervelt Parametric Acoustic Array , 1963 .

[8]  B. Cherek Contactless measurement of mechanical vibrations based on the Doppler effect , 1987 .

[9]  R. Kleinman,et al.  Scattering by linearly vibrating objects , 1979 .

[10]  D. Royer,et al.  Optical probing of the mechanical impulse response of a transducer , 1986 .

[11]  Peter H. Rogers,et al.  Censor’s acoustical Doppler effect analysis—Is it a valid method? , 1988 .

[12]  J. Monchalin Optical Detection of Ultrasound , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[13]  Kevin J. Parker,et al.  Time domain Doppler estimators of the amplitude of vibrating targets , 1992 .

[14]  Ming-Shing Young,et al.  A high precision ultrasonic system for vibration measurements , 1992 .

[15]  A. Bruce Carlson,et al.  Communication systems: an introduction to signals and noise in electrical communication , 1975 .

[16]  Y. Yamakoshi,et al.  Ultrasonic imaging of internal vibration of soft tissue under forced vibration , 1990, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[18]  Jeffery Cooper Scattering by moving bodies: The Quasi-Stationary approximation , 1980 .

[19]  P. Rogers Comments on ``Scattering by time varying obstacles'' , 1973 .

[20]  V. Zverev,et al.  Modulation of sound by sound in the intersection of sound waves , 1971 .