Modeling the Effect of Shock Unsteadiness in Shock-Wave / Turbulent Boundary Layer Interactions

Reynolds-averaged Navier‐Stokes (RANS) methods often cannot predict shock/turbulence interaction correctly. This may be because RANS models do not account for the unsteady motion of the shock wave that is inherent in these interactions. Previous work proposed a shock-unsteadiness correction that significantly improves prediction of turbulent kinetic energy amplification across a normal shock in homogeneous isotropic turbulence. We generalize the modification to shock-wave/turbulent boundary-layer interactions and implement it in the k‐� , k‐ω, and Spalart‐Allmaras models. In compression-corner flows, the correction decreases the turbulent kinetic energy amplification across the shock compared to the standard k‐� and k‐ω models. This results in improved prediction of the separation shock location, delayed reattachment, and slower recovery of the boundary layer on the ramp. For the Spalart‐Allmaras model, the modification amplifies eddy viscosity across the shock, moving the separation location closer to the experiment.

[1]  T. Shih,et al.  A new k-ϵ eddy viscosity model for high reynolds number turbulent flows , 1995 .

[2]  P. Durbin On the k-3 stagnation point anomaly , 1996 .

[3]  Doyle Knight,et al.  RTO WG 10: CFD Validation for Shock Wave Turbulent Boundary Layer Interactions , 2002 .

[4]  T. J. Coakley,et al.  TURBULENCE MODELING FOR HIGH SPEED FLOWS , 1992 .

[5]  Gary S. Settles,et al.  Reattachment of a Compressible Turbulent Free Shear Layer , 1982 .

[6]  D. Wilcox Reassessment of the scale-determining equation for advanced turbulence models , 1988 .

[7]  William W. Liou,et al.  Turbulence model assessment for shock wave/turbulent boundary-layer interaction in transonic and supersonic flows , 2000 .

[8]  F. Menter Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications , 1994 .

[9]  B. Launder,et al.  Application of the energy-dissipation model of turbulence to the calculation of flow near a spinning disc , 1974 .

[10]  David Dolling Unsteadiness of shock-induced turbulent separated flows - Some key questions , 2001 .

[11]  G. Candler,et al.  Data-Parallel Line Relaxation Method for the Navier -Stokes Equations , 1998 .

[12]  Krishnan Mahesh,et al.  Modeling shock unsteadiness in shock/turbulence interaction , 2003 .

[13]  David C. Wilcox,et al.  Supersonic compression-corner applications of a multiscale model forturbulent flows , 1990 .

[14]  P. Spalart A One-Equation Turbulence Model for Aerodynamic Flows , 1992 .

[15]  Sutanu Sarkar,et al.  The pressure-dilatation correlation in compressible flows , 1992 .

[16]  James R. Forsythe,et al.  AN ASSESSMENT OF SEVERAL TURBULENCE MODELS FOR SUPERSONIC COMPRESSION RAMP FLOW , 1998 .

[17]  Gary S. Settles,et al.  Supersonic and hypersonic shock/boundary-layer interaction database , 1994 .

[18]  G. Candler,et al.  Convergence improvement of two-equation turbulence model calculations , 1998 .

[19]  Graham V. Candler,et al.  The solution of the Navier-Stokes equations using Gauss-Seidel line relaxation , 1989 .

[20]  D. Wilcox Turbulence modeling for CFD , 1993 .

[21]  Gary S. Settles,et al.  A Reattaching Free Shear Layer in Compressible Turbulent Flow: A Comparison of Numerical and Experimental Results , 1981 .

[22]  Gordon Erlebacher,et al.  The analysis and modelling of dilatational terms in compressible turbulence , 1989, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.