Comparing computer game and traditional lecture using experience ratings from high and low achieving students

Computer games are purported to be effective instructional tools that enhance motivation and improve engagement. The aim of this study was to investigate how tertiary student experiences change when instruction was computer game based compared to lecture based, and whether experiences differed between high and low achieving students. Participants consisted two cohorts enrolled in a first year university course (Cohort 1, traditional: male=42, female=17; Cohort 2, computer game: male=42, female=7). Cohort 1 experienced course content as traditional lectures, Cohort 2 experienced course content embedded within a computer game. Csikszentmihalyi's experience sampling method was used to sample experiences of students for each cohort during instruction. Results showed that the computer game group were more challenged and valued the activity more than the traditional group, but were inclined to wish they were doing something else. High achieving students during game mode showed greater concentration but found it harder to concentrate and found game mode more sociable and lecture mode more boring. High achievers perceived greater success for lecture mode and found lectures more satisfying. Individual profiles of high and low achieving students for each mode indicated that games afforded better experiences for low achieving students but poorer experiences for high achieving students.

[1]  Diana G. Oblinger,et al.  Educating the Net Generation , 2005 .

[2]  Michele D. Dickey Murder on Grimm Isle: The impact of game narrative design in an educational game‐based learning environment , 2011 .

[3]  Amanda Lenhart,et al.  Adults and video games , 2008 .

[4]  R. Larson,et al.  The Experience of Psychopathology: Analyzing Experience Sampling data: a guide book for the perplexed , 1992 .

[5]  M. Prensky Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants , 2001 .

[6]  Mark Stansfield,et al.  An application of games-based learning within software engineering , 2007, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[7]  P. Sander,et al.  University Students' Expectations of Teaching , 2000 .

[8]  Diane Magrane,et al.  Educational games in an obstetrics and gynecology core curriculum. , 2005, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[9]  John Carroll,et al.  Evaluating Coursework in Computer Games Degrees: Students and Assessors as Virtual Characters , 2009 .

[10]  Jason Haas,et al.  The Education Arcade , 2012 .

[11]  M. Lepper,et al.  Intrinsic Motivation and instruction: conflicting Views on the Role of Motivational Processes in Computer-Based Education , 1985 .

[12]  Jonathan deHaan Acquisition of Japanese as a Foreign Language Through a Baseball Video Game , 2005 .

[13]  Ross A. Thompson,et al.  Student Background and Course Involvement among First-Year College Students in Introduction to Psychology: Implications for Course Design and Student Achievement , 2004 .

[14]  Timo Lainema,et al.  Applying an authentic, dynamic learning environment in real world business , 2006, Comput. Educ..

[15]  Donovan A. McFarlane,et al.  Evaluating Training Programs: The Four Levels , 2006 .

[16]  M. Csíkszentmihályi,et al.  The experience of psychopathology: Investigating mental disorders in their natural settings. , 1992 .

[17]  M. Csíkszentmihályi,et al.  Talented Teenagers: The Roots of Success and Failure , 1993 .

[18]  M. Csíkszentmihályi,et al.  Experience Sampling Method: Measuring the Quality of Everyday Life , 2006 .

[19]  Michelle F. Wright,et al.  Computer Gaming and Interactive Simulations for Learning: A Meta-Analysis , 2006 .

[20]  J. N. Approaches to learning and perceptions of the learning environment Introduction to the Special Issue , 2004 .

[21]  Traci Sitzmann A META-ANALYTIC EXAMINATION OF THE INSTRUCTIONAL EFFECTIVENESS OF COMPUTER-BASED SIMULATION GAMES , 2011 .

[22]  Sarah Gielen,et al.  Students’ experiences with contrasting learning environments: The added value of students’ perceptions , 2008 .

[23]  William B Wood,et al.  Teaching more by lecturing less. , 2005, Cell biology education.