Traits‐based approaches in bioassessment and ecological risk assessment: Strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats

We discuss the application of traits-based bioassessment approaches in retrospective bioassessment as well as in prospective ecological risk assessments in regulatory frameworks. Both approaches address the interaction between species and stressors and their consequences at different levels of biological organization, but the fact that a specific species may be less abundant in a potentially impacted site compared with a reference site is, regrettably, insufficient to provide diagnostic information. Species traits may, however, overcome the problems associated with taxonomy-based bioassessment. Trait-based approaches could provide signals regarding what environmental factors may be responsible for the impairment and, thereby, provide causal insight into the interaction between species and stressors. For development of traits-based (TBA), traits should correspond to specific types of stressors or suites of stressors. In this paper, a strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) analysis of TBA in both applications was used to identify challenges and potentials. This paper is part of a series describing the output of the TERA (Traits-based ecological risk assessment: Realising the potential of ecoinformatics approaches in ecotoxicology) Workshop held between 7 and 11 September, 2009, in Burlington, Ontario, Canada. The recognized strengths were that traits are transferrable across geographies, add mechanistic and diagnostic knowledge, require no new sampling methodology, have an old tradition, and can supplement taxonomic analysis. Weaknesses include autocorrelation, redundancy, and inability to protect biodiversity directly. Automated image analysis, combined with genetic and biotechnology tools and improved data analysis to solve autocorrelation problems were identified as opportunities, whereas low availability of trait data, their transferability, their quantitative interpretation, the risk of developing nonrelevant traits, low quality of historic databases, and their standardization were listed as threats.

[1]  G. Orians,et al.  Some adaptations of marsh-nesting blackbirds. , 1982, Monographs in population biology.

[2]  Theo C. M. Brock,et al.  Aquatic Risks of Pesticides, Ecological Protection Goals, and Common Aims in European Union Legislation , 2006 .

[3]  K. Siimes,et al.  Effects of pesticides on community structure and ecosystem functions in agricultural streams of three biogeographical regions in Europe. , 2007, The Science of the total environment.

[4]  Peter Goethals,et al.  Evaluation of river basin restoration options by the application of the Water Framework Directive Explorer in the Zwalm River basin (Flanders, Belgium) , 2009 .

[5]  Philip A R Hockey,et al.  Use of basic biological information for rapid prediction of the response of species to habitat loss. , 2009, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[6]  Matthias Schneider,et al.  Fish habitat modelling as a tool for river management , 2007 .

[7]  Kozo Watanabe,et al.  Stochastic model for recovery prediction of macroinvertebrates following a pulse-disturbance in river , 2005 .

[8]  P. Calow,et al.  Does ecotoxicology inform ecological risk assessment , 2003 .

[9]  S. Peacor,et al.  A REVIEW OF TRAIT-MEDIATED INDIRECT INTERACTIONS IN ECOLOGICAL COMMUNITIES , 2003 .

[10]  Theo P Traas,et al.  A freshwater food web model for the combined effects of nutrients and insecticide stress and subsequent recovery , 2004, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[11]  T. R. E. Southwood,et al.  Tactics, strategies and templets* , 1988 .

[12]  Paul J. Van den Brink,et al.  Effects of the insecticide dursban® 4E (active ingredient chlorpyrifos) in outdoor experimental ditches: II. Invertebrate community responses and recovery , 1996 .

[13]  Donald J Baird,et al.  Using biological traits to predict species sensitivity to toxic substances. , 2007, Ecotoxicology and environmental safety.

[14]  Dick de Zwart,et al.  Toward a knowledge infrastructure for traits‐based ecological risk assessment , 2011, Integrated environmental assessment and management.

[15]  T. R. E. Southwood,et al.  HABITAT, THE TEMPLET FOR ECOLOGICAL STRATEGIES? , 1977 .

[16]  S. Dyer,et al.  Comparison of species sensitivity distributions derived from interspecies correlation models to distributions used to derive water quality criteria. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[17]  David R. Lenat,et al.  A Biotic Index for the Southeastern United States: Derivation and List of Tolerance Values, with Criteria for Assigning Water-Quality Ratings , 1993, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[18]  B. Statzner,et al.  Perspectives for biomonitoring at large spatial scales: a unified measure for the functional composition of invertebrate communities in European running waters , 2001 .

[19]  Jana Verboom,et al.  An individual‐based approach to model spatial population dynamics of invertebrates in aquatic ecosystems after pesticide contamination , 2007, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[20]  Paul J. Van den Brink.  Letter to the editor: Response to recent criticism on aquatic semifield experiments: Opportunities for new developments in ecological risk assessment of pesticides , 2006 .

[21]  P. J. Van den Brink,et al.  Potential application of population models in the European ecological risk assessment of chemicals II: Review of models and their potential to address environmental protection aims , 2010, Integrated environmental assessment and management.

[22]  N. LeRoy Poff,et al.  Functional trait niches of North American lotic insects: traits-based ecological applications in light of phylogenetic relationships , 2006, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[23]  E.T.H.M. Peeters,et al.  New methods to assess the ecological status of surface waters in The Netherlands. Part 1: Running waters. , 1994 .

[24]  Alison H. Purcell,et al.  Long-Term Variability in Bioassessments: A Twenty-Year Study from Two Northern California Streams , 2009, Environmental management.

[25]  Carola A. Schriever,et al.  The footprint of pesticide stress in communities--species traits reveal community effects of toxicants. , 2008, The Science of the total environment.

[26]  I. Roessink,et al.  Impact of a benzoyl urea insecticide on aquatic macroinvertebrates in ditch mesocosms with and without non‐sprayed sections , 2009, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[27]  M. Daam,et al.  Implications of differences between temperate and tropical freshwater ecosystems for the ecological risk assessment of pesticides , 2010, Ecotoxicology.

[28]  Deborah N. Vivian,et al.  Protectiveness of species sensitivity distribution hazard concentrations for acute toxicity used in endangered species risk assessment , 2008, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[29]  D. Schluter.  Character Displacement between Distantly Related Taxa? Finches and Bees in the Galapagos , 1986, The American Naturalist.

[30]  Thomas H Hutchinson,et al.  Ecotoxicogenomics: the challenge of integrating genomics into aquatic and terrestrial ecotoxicology. , 2004, Aquatic toxicology.

[31]  Peter M. Chapman,et al.  A Decision-Making Framework for Sediment Contamination , 2005, Integrated environmental assessment and management.

[32]  V. Grimm,et al.  Ecological Models in Support of Regulatory Risk Assessments of Pesticides: Developing a Strategy for the Future , 2009, Integrated environmental assessment and management.

[33]  Philippe Usseglio-Polatera,et al.  Traits of benthic macroinvertebrates in semi‐natural French streams: an initial application to biomonitoring in Europe , 2000 .

[34]  P. Goethals,et al.  Implications of taxonomic modifications and alien species on biological water quality assessment as exemplified by the Belgian Biotic Index method , 2005 .

[35]  Peter Goethals,et al.  A fish-based index of biotic integrity for upstream brooks in Flanders (Belgium) , 2004, Hydrobiologia.

[36]  Theodore Garland,et al.  Aquatic insect ecophysiological traits reveal phylogenetically based differences in dissolved cadmium susceptibility , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[37]  Shahid Naeem,et al.  Biodiversity enhances ecosystem reliability , 1997, Nature.

[38]  R. Kennedy,et al.  Advancing Science for Water Resources Management , 2006, Hydrobiologia.

[39]  Donald J Baird,et al.  A new method for ranking mode‐specific sensitivity of freshwater arthropods to insecticides and its relationship to biological traits , 2010, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[40]  M. Liess,et al.  Rank Ordering of Macroinvertebrate Species Sensitivityto Toxic Compounds by Comparison with That of Daphnia magna , 2001, Bulletin of environmental contamination and toxicology.

[41]  D. M. Rosenberg,et al.  Freshwater biomonitoring and benthic macroinvertebrates. , 1994 .

[42]  M. Timmermans,et al.  Genetic Variation in Toxicant-Stressed Populations: An Evaluation of the “Genetic Erosion” Hypothesis , 2002 .

[43]  Roman Ashauer,et al.  Framework for traits‐based assessment in ecotoxicology , 2011, Integrated environmental assessment and management.

[44]  J. Garric,et al.  Development of rearing and testing protocols for a new freshwater sediment test species: the gastropod Valvata piscinalis. , 2006, Chemosphere.

[45]  Ingolf Kühn,et al.  Trait interactions help explain plant invasion success in the German flora , 2008 .

[46]  N LeRoy Poff,et al.  Incorporating traits in aquatic biomonitoring to enhance causal diagnosis and prediction , 2011, Integrated environmental assessment and management.

[47]  M. Liess,et al.  Analyzing effects of pesticides on invertebrate communities in streams , 2005, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[48]  W. Hilsenhoff,et al.  An Improved Biotic Index of Organic Stream Pollution , 2017, The Great Lakes Entomologist.

[49]  Peter Goethals,et al.  DEVELOPMENT OF A CONCEPT FOR INTEGRATED ECOLOGICAL RIVER ASSESSMENT IN FLANDERS, BELGIUM , 2001 .

[50]  Sylvain Dolédec,et al.  Species traits for future biomonitoring across ecoregions: patterns along a human-impacted river , 1999 .

[51]  S. Dyer,et al.  Interspecies correlation estimates predict protective environmental concentrations. , 2006, Environmental science & technology.

[52]  Paul J. Van den Brink,et al.  Ecological risk assessment: from book-keeping to chemical stress ecology. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[53]  P. Calow,et al.  Peer Reviewed: Does Ecotoxicology Inform Ecological Risk Assessment? , 2003 .

[54]  Donald J Baird,et al.  Traits‐based ecological risk assessment (TERA): Realizing the potential of ecoinformatics approaches in ecotoxicology , 2011, Integrated environmental assessment and management.

[55]  P. Usseglio-Polatera,et al.  Assessing pollution of toxic sediment in streams using bio‐ecological traits of benthic macroinvertebrates , 2009 .

[56]  R. Nisbet,et al.  Indirect effects of contaminants in aquatic ecosystems. , 2003, The Science of the total environment.

[57]  Martin C. Thoms,et al.  Global partnerships and the new international society for river science (ISRS) , 2007 .

[58]  D. Roux,et al.  Bridging the Science-Management Divide: Moving from Unidirectional Knowledge Transfer to Knowledge Interfacing and Sharing , 2006 .

[59]  Roger Vargas,et al.  How risky is risk assessment: the role that life history strategies play in susceptibility of species to stress. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[60]  Donald J Baird,et al.  Trait-Based Ecological Risk Assessment (TERA): The New Frontier , 2008, Integrated environmental assessment and management.

[61]  Daniel L Villeneuve,et al.  Adverse outcome pathways: A conceptual framework to support ecotoxicology research and risk assessment , 2010, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[62]  Allison A. Snow,et al.  GENETICALLY ENGINEERED ORGANISMS AND THE ENVIRONMENT: CURRENT STATUS AND RECOMMENDATIONS1 , 2005 .

[63]  S. Hawkins,et al.  Biodiversity effects on ecosystem functioning: emerging issues and their experimental test in aquatic environments , 2004 .

[64]  P. J. Van den Brink,et al.  Potential application of ecological models in the European environmental risk assessment of chemicals I: Review of protection goals in EU directives and regulations , 2010, Integrated environmental assessment and management.

[65]  T. Wiederholm.  Use of benthos in lake monitoring , 1980 .

[66]  Michael A. Huston,et al.  Hidden treatments in ecological experiments: re-evaluating the ecosystem function of biodiversity , 1997, Oecologia.

[67]  M. Loreau,et al.  Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning : synthesis and perspectives , 2002 .

[68]  Richard A. Park,et al.  AQUATOX: Modeling environmental fate and ecological effects in aquatic ecosystems ☆ , 2008 .

[69]  David P. Larsen,et al.  Rare species in multivariate analysis for bioassessment: some considerations , 2001, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[70]  N. M. Straalen,et al.  Ecotoxicology becomes stress ecology. , 2003 .

[71]  M. Desrosiers,et al.  Efficiency of sediment quality guidelines for predicting toxicity: The case of the St. Lawrence river , 2010, Integrated environmental assessment and management.

[72]  B. Ferrari,et al.  Laboratory-to-field extrapolation in aquatic sciences. , 2007, Environmental science & technology.

[73]  D. Sol,et al.  A global risk assessment for the success of bird introductions , 2009 .

[74]  Peter Goethals,et al.  River Monitoring and Assessment Methods Based on Macroinvertebrates , 2006 .

[75]  Roman Ashauer,et al.  CREAM: a European project on mechanistic effect models for ecological risk assessment of chemicals , 2009, Environmental science and pollution research international.

[76]  Philippe Usseglio-Polatera,et al.  Biological and ecological traits of benthic freshwater macroinvertebrates: relationships and definition of groups with similar traits , 2000 .

[77]  D. Dudley Williams,et al.  How important are rare species in aquatic community ecology and bioassessment? , 1998 .