Comparison of manual whole-body and passive and active head-on-body rotational testing with conventional rotary chair testing.

New methods of rotational testing of the vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) using manually generated or patient-generated sinusoidal head movements have recently been advocated for clinical use in circumstances where conventional rotary chair testing methods are not feasible. However, studies seeking to provide evidence for the validity of these methods by comparing their results with an accepted "gold-standard" have been conspicuously absent in the literature. In this study, we compared results for VOR gain, phase, and asymmetry obtained using whole-body and head-on-body rotational stimuli with those obtained by conventional rotary chair testing in 35 subjects with either unilateral or bilateral vestibular deficits over the range of frequencies from 0.025 Hz to 1 Hz. Our results provide evidence for the validity of manual whole-body and active and passive head-on-body rotational testing methods by demonstrating excellent agreement between each of these and conventional rotational chair testing for VOR gain, phase, and asymmetry within the frequency range studied. Small differences at specific-paradigm datapoints are likely secondary to subtle limitations of our experimental design. With further refinement, we expect the new methods will be useful adjuncts for evaluating patients with vestibular complaints in selected clinical situations.

[1]  Head-shake vestibulo-ocular reflex testing: comparison of results with rotational chair testing. , 1995, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[2]  J. Furman,et al.  Head-only rotational testing: influence of volition and vision. , 1995, Journal of vestibular research : equilibrium & orientation.

[3]  D. O'leary,et al.  Comparison of Vestibular Autorotation and Caloric Testing , 1995, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[4]  J A Goebel,et al.  Utility of headshake versus whole-body VOR evaluation during routine electronystagmography. , 1992, The American journal of otology.

[5]  J. Kanzaki,et al.  Spatial gaze stability under active high-frequency head oscillation after acoustic neuroma surgery. , 1991, Acta oto-laryngologica. Supplementum.

[6]  I. Nagayama,et al.  Development of high frequency vestibulo-ocular responses to active head shaking. , 1995, Acta oto-laryngologica. Supplementum.

[7]  B Hoshowsky,et al.  The horizontal vestibulo‐ocular reflex gain during active and passive high‐frequency head movements , 1994, The Laryngoscope.

[8]  D. O'leary,et al.  High-frequency autorotational testing of the vestibulo-ocular reflex. , 1990, Neurologic clinics.

[9]  H. Scherer,et al.  Cervico-ocular eye movements in relation to different neck torsion velocities. , 1989, Acta oto-laryngologica. Supplementum.

[10]  G. Paige,et al.  Headshake versus whole‐body rotation testing of the vestibulo‐ocular reflex , 1991, The Laryngoscope.

[11]  David F. Henry,et al.  Closed-Loop Caloric, Harmonic Acceleration and Active Head Rotation Tests: Norms and Reliability , 1993, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[12]  D. O'leary,et al.  Analysis of vestibulo-ocular reflex using sweep frequency active head movements. , 1988, Advances in oto-rhino-laryngology.

[13]  A Kasteel-van Linge,et al.  Quantification of visuo-vestibular interaction up to 5.0 Hz in normal subjects. , 1990, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[14]  R. Mathog Testing of the vestibular system by sinusoidal angular acceleration. , 1972, Acta oto-laryngologica.