Evidence for the embodiment of space perception: concurrent hand but not arm action moderates reachability and egocentric distance perception

The perception of reachability (i.e., whether an object is within reach) relies on body representations and action simulation. Similarly, egocentric distance estimation (i.e., the perception of the distance an object is from the self) is thought to be partly derived from embodied action simulation. Although motor simulation is important for both, it is unclear whether the cognitive processes underlying these behaviors rely on the same motor processes. To investigate this, we measured the impact of a motor interference dual-task paradigm on reachability judgment and egocentric distance estimation, while allocentric length estimation (i.e., how distant two stimuli are from each other independent from the self) was used as a control task. Participants were required to make concurrent actions with either hand actions of foam ball grip squeezing or arm actions of weight lifting, or no concurrent actions. Results showed that concurrent squeeze actions significantly slowed response speed in the reachability judgment and egocentric distance estimation tasks, but that there was no impact of the concurrent actions on allocentric length estimation. Together, these results suggest that reachability and distance perception, both egocentric perspective tasks, and in contrast to the allocentric perspective task, involve action simulation cognitive processes. The results are discussed in terms of the implication of action simulation when evaluating the position of a target relative to the observer’s body, supporting an embodied view of spatial cognition.

[1]  Jody C. Culham,et al.  fMRI reveals a preference for near viewing in the human parieto-occipital cortex , 2007, NeuroImage.

[2]  M. Hallett,et al.  Motor planning, imagery, and execution in the distributed motor network: a time-course study with functional MRI. , 2008, Cerebral cortex.

[3]  R. Gregory,et al.  Distortion of Visual Space as Inappropriate Constancy Scaling , 1963, Nature.

[4]  A. Berthoz,et al.  Reference Frames for Spatial Cognition: Different Brain Areas are Involved in Viewer-, Object-, and Landmark-Centered Judgments About Object Location , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[5]  Jérémy Bourgeois,et al.  Effect of visuomotor calibration and uncertainty on the perception of peripersonal space , 2012, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[6]  P. Derambure,et al.  Perceiving What Is Reachable Depends on Motor Representations: Evidence from a Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Study , 2008, PloS one.

[7]  A. Berthoz,et al.  The neural basis of egocentric and allocentric coding of space in humans: a functional magnetic resonance study , 2000, Experimental Brain Research.

[8]  C. Gross,et al.  Coding of visual space by premotor neurons. , 1994, Science.

[9]  F. Osiurak,et al.  Tool use and perceived distance: when unreachable becomes spontaneously reachable , 2012, Experimental Brain Research.

[10]  Luciano Fadiga,et al.  Perception Through Action , 1999 .

[11]  F. Osiurak,et al.  Within reach but not so reachable: Obstacles matter in visual perception of distances , 2013, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[12]  Jeanine K. Stefanucci,et al.  The Role of Effort in Perceiving Distance , 2003, Psychological science.

[13]  M. H. Fischer,et al.  Estimating reachability: Whole body engagement or postural stability? , 2000 .

[14]  Alain Berthoz,et al.  Multiple reference frames used by the human brain for spatial perception and memory , 2010, Experimental Brain Research.

[15]  Martin H. Fischer,et al.  Action simulation for others is not constrained by one’s own postures , 2005, Neuropsychologia.

[16]  M. Jeannerod The cognitive neuroscience of action , 1997, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[17]  P. Rochat,et al.  An account of the systematic error in judging what is reachable. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[18]  F. Pavani,et al.  Action-specific remapping of peripersonal space , 2010, Neuropsychologia.

[19]  Alain Berthoz,et al.  A fronto-parietal system for computing the egocentric spatial frame of reference in humans , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[20]  G Rizzolatti,et al.  The Space Around Us , 1997, Science.

[21]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Visuomotor neurons: ambiguity of the discharge or 'motor' perception? , 2000, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[22]  M. Jeannerod Neural Simulation of Action: A Unifying Mechanism for Motor Cognition , 2001, NeuroImage.

[23]  D. Proffitt,et al.  Action-specific influences on distance perception: a role for motor simulation. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[24]  Jeanine K. Stefanucci,et al.  The effects of handedness and reachability on perceived distance. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[25]  Fred W. Mast,et al.  The neural basis of the egocentric and allocentric spatial frame of reference , 2007, Brain Research.

[26]  F. Previc The neuropsychology of 3-D space. , 1998, Psychological bulletin.

[27]  H. Ehrsson,et al.  That's Near My Hand! Parietal and Premotor Coding of Hand-Centered Space Contributes to Localization and Self-Attribution of the Hand , 2012, Journal of Neuroscience.

[28]  J. Witt Action’s Effect on Perception , 2011 .

[29]  C. Gabbard,et al.  Hand effects on mentally simulated reaching. , 2005, Human movement science.

[30]  Kristen L. Macuga,et al.  Neural representations involved in observed, imagined, and imitated actions are dissociable and hierarchically organized , 2012, NeuroImage.

[31]  L. Parsons Temporal and kinematic properties of motor behavior reflected in mentally simulated action. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[32]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Motor and cognitive functions of the ventral premotor cortex , 2002, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[33]  M. Turvey,et al.  Visually perceiving what is reachable. , 1989 .

[34]  W. Epstein,et al.  Perceiving Distance: A Role of Effort and Intent , 2004, Perception.

[35]  K. Zilles,et al.  Neural consequences of acting in near versus far space: a physiological basis for clinical dissociations. , 2000, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[36]  V. Gallese The "Conscious" Dorsal Stream: Embodied Simulation and its Role in Space and Action Conscious Awareness , 2007 .

[37]  Tina Iachini,et al.  Motor resources in peripersonal space are intrinsic to spatial encoding: evidence from motor interference. , 2014, Acta psychologica.

[38]  A Farnè,et al.  Dynamic size‐change of hand peripersonal space following tool use , 2000, Neuroreport.

[39]  M. Jeannerod,et al.  Influence of object position and size on human prehension movements , 1997, Experimental Brain Research.

[40]  Francesco Pavani,et al.  Grasping actions remap peripersonal space , 2009, Neuroreport.

[41]  M. Jeannerod,et al.  The timing of mentally represented actions , 1989, Behavioural Brain Research.

[42]  D. Proffitt Embodied Perception and the Economy of Action , 2006, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[43]  Jody C Culham,et al.  Is That within Reach? fMRI Reveals That the Human Superior Parieto-Occipital Cortex Encodes Objects Reachable by the Hand , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[44]  Valérie Dormal,et al.  A common metric magnitude system for the perception and production of numerosity, length, and duration , 2013, Front. Psychol..

[45]  G H Fisher,et al.  Illusions and size-constancy. , 1968, The American journal of psychology.

[46]  E. Poulton Models for biases in judging sensory magnitude. , 1979, Psychological bulletin.

[47]  Umberto Sabatini,et al.  Neural bases of personal and extrapersonal neglect in humans. , 2007, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[48]  Satoshi Endo,et al.  Contribution of the motor system to the perception of reachable space: an fMRI study , 2014, The European journal of neuroscience.

[49]  Yann Coello,et al.  Embodiment, spatial categorisation and action , 2007, Consciousness and Cognition.

[50]  B. Hommel Action control according to TEC (theory of event coding) , 2009, Psychological research.

[51]  Charles G. Gross,et al.  REVIEW ■ : Multiple Representations of Space in the Brain , 1995 .

[52]  W. Epstein,et al.  Tool use affects perceived distance, but only when you intend to use it. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[53]  A. Berti,et al.  When Far Becomes Near: Remapping of Space by Tool Use , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[54]  Carl Gabbard,et al.  Examining the Effects of Postural Constraints on Estimating Reach , 2007, Journal of motor behavior.

[55]  Martin H. Fischer,et al.  Perceived reachability: the roles of handedness and hemifield , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[56]  Stella F. Lourenco,et al.  On the nature of near space: Effects of tool use and the transition to far space , 2006, Neuropsychologia.

[57]  Carl Gabbard,et al.  Perceived reachability in hemispace , 2005, Brain and Cognition.

[58]  G. Aschersleben,et al.  The Theory of Event Coding (TEC): a framework for perception and action planning. , 2001, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[59]  R. Andersen,et al.  Multimodal representation of space in the posterior parietal cortex and its use in planning movements. , 1997, Annual review of neuroscience.