Publishing patterns within the UK accounting and finance academic community

This study reports on publishing patterns in the UK and Irish accounting and finance academic community for the 2-year period 1998–1999 using the data contained in the BAR Research Register. It is found that the community has been growing modestly since 1991, with a doubling in the number of PhD-qualified staff (to 30%) and a reduction in the number with a professional qualification (from 81 to 58%). Nearly half of all outputs appear in other than academic journals. The mean number of publications is 1.76 per capita, with significantly more staff active in publishing than in 1991 (44% compared to 35%). However, only 17% publish in a subset of 60 ‘top’ journals. Just over half of all articles are published in the core discipline journals, the rest appearing mainly in management, economics, sociology, education and IT journals. This may indicate a growing maturity in the disciplines, whereby applied research findings are flowing back into related foundation and business disciplines. Nearly two-thirds of academic articles are co-authored, with 25% of contributions coming from outside the community, indicating an openness to interdisciplinary collaboration, collaboration with overseas academics and collaboration with individuals in practice. The findings of this study will be of assistance to those making career decisions (either their own career or decisions involving other people's careers). They also raise awareness of the way in which the accounting and finance disciplines are developing.

[1]  Thomas A. Lee.  Shaping the US Academic Accounting Research Profession: The American Accounting Association and the Social Construction of a Professional Elite , 1995 .

[2]  D. Sullivan,et al.  Theories and theory groups in contemporary American sociology , 1975 .

[3]  Dennis C. Mueller,et al.  Mergers and Market Share , 1985 .

[4]  James R. Hasselback,et al.  Benchmarks for evaluating the research productivity of accounting faculty , 2000 .

[5]  N. Mullins,et al.  Theories and Theory Groups in Contemporary American Sociology. , 1975 .

[6]  Paul F. Williams,et al.  ACCOUNTING FROM THE INSIDE: LEGITIMIZING THE ACCOUNTING ACADEMIC ELITE , 1999 .

[7]  H. Willmott.  Managing the Academics: Commodification and Control in the Development of University Education in the U.K. , 1995 .

[8]  Vivien Beattie,et al.  Performance indices and related measures of journal reputation in accounting , 1989 .

[9]  R. Gray,et al.  Rites of Passage and the Self-Immolation of Academic Accounting Labour: An Essay Exploring Exclusivity versus Mutuality in Accounting Scholarship , 2002 .

[10]  Ronald J. Huefner,et al.  The Familiarity with and Perceived Quality of Accounting Journals: Views of Senior Accounting Faculty in Leading U. S. MBA Programs , 2008 .

[11]  T. W. McRae,et al.  A Citational Analysis of the Accounting Information Network , 1974 .

[12]  R. Gray,et al.  UK Accounting Academics And Publication: An Exploration Of Observable Variables Associated With Publication Output , 1994 .

[13]  K. Lukka,et al.  Is accounting a global or a local discipline? evidence from major research journals , 1996 .

[14]  Maurice Pendlebury,et al.  Why Do UK Accounting and Finance Academics not Publish in top US Journals , 2001 .

[15]  R. Hussey,et al.  PUBLISHING IN PROFESSIONAL ACCOUNTING JOURNALS: ACADEMIC INSTITUTIONAL PERFORMANCE 1987–96 , 2000 .

[16]  Brett R. Wilkinson,et al.  A Study of Accounting Faculty Publishing Productivity in New Zealand , 1998 .

[17]  Stanley Presser,et al.  Collaboration and the Quality of Research , 1980 .

[18]  J. R. Cole,et al.  Scientific output and recognition: a study in the operation of the reward system in science. , 1967, American sociological review.

[19]  H. Willmott,et al.  Systems Of Surveillance And The Silencing Of UK Academic Accounting Labour , 1994 .

[20]  R. H. Mabry,et al.  Relative Significance of Journals, Authors, and Articles Cited in Financial Research , 1994 .

[21]  T. A. Lee,et al.  Education, Practice and Research in Accounting: Gaps, Closed Loops, Bridges and Magic Accounting , 1989 .

[22]  C. Borgman,et al.  Scholarly Communication and Bibliometrics. , 1992 .

[23]  James Guthrie,et al.  Accounting and management research: passwords from the gatekeepers , 1998 .

[24]  William J. Bertin,et al.  Publish or Perish: What the Competition Is Really Doing , 1992 .

[25]  M. Jones,et al.  UK Accountants' Perceptions of Research Journal Quality , 1996 .

[26]  Miklos A. Vasarhelyi,et al.  AN ANALYSIS OF THE RESEARCH CONTRIBUTIONS OF ACCOUNTING, ORGANIZATIONS AND SOCIETY, 1976-1984. , 1987 .

[27]  Brett R. Wilkinson,et al.  Publishing Productivity of Australian Accounting Units Based on Current Faculty Composition , 2000 .

[28]  Thomas A. Lee,et al.  The editorial gatekeepers of the accounting academy , 1997 .

[29]  M. Stock.  A Notable Exception , 1962 .

[30]  Jonathan Furner,et al.  Scholarly communication and bibliometrics , 2005, Annu. Rev. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[31]  Warren Allen.  The Future of Accounting Education , 1999 .

[32]  Consistency and stability of UK academic publication output criteria in accounting , 1989 .

[33]  Paul F. Williams,et al.  The Accounting Review and the Production of Accounting Knowledge , 1995 .

[34]  V. Beattie,et al.  The Impact of Non-Serial Publications on Research in Accounting and Finance , 1991 .

[35]  L. Brown,et al.  Using Citation Analysis to Assess the Impact of Journals and Articles on Contemporary Accounting Research (CAR) , 1985 .

[36]  Joanne Locke,et al.  Problematising the Construction of Journal Quality: An Engagement with the Mainstream , 2002 .

[37]  William Threipland Baxter.  Accounting research : academic trends versus practical needs , 1988 .