The savings of energy saving: interactions between energy supply and demand-side options—quantification for Portugal

Reducing demand by increasing end-use energy efficiency on the demand side of energy systems may also have advantages in reducing fossil dependency and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions on the supply side. This paper addresses interactions between energy supply- and demand-side policies, by estimating the impact of measures addressing end-use energy efficiency and small-scale renewables uses in terms of (1) avoided large-scale electricity generation capacity, (2) final energy consumption, (3) share of renewables in final energy and (4) reduction of GHG emissions. The Portuguese energy system is used as a case study. The TIMES_PT bottom-up model was used to generate four scenarios covering the period up to 2020, corresponding to different levels of efficiency of equipment in buildings, transport and industry. In the current policy scenario, the deployment of end-use equipment follows the 2000–2005 trends and the National Energy Efficiency Action Plan targets. In the efficient scenarios, all types of equipment can be replaced by more efficient ones. Results show that aggressive demand-side options for the industry and buildings sector and the small-scale use of renewables can remove the need for the increase in large-scale renewable electricity capacity by 4.7 GW currently discussed by policy makers. Although these measures reduce total final energy by only 0–2 %, this represents reductions of 11–14 % in the commercial sector, with savings in total energy system costs of approximately 3,000 million euros2000—roughly equivalent to 2 % of the 2010 Portuguese GDP. The cost-effectiveness of policy measures should guide choices between supply shifts and demand reduction. Such balanced policy development can lead to substantial cost reductions in climate and energy policy.

[1]  P. Nijkamp,et al.  Energy Saving by Firms, Decision-Making, Barriers and Policies , 2001 .

[2]  Noureddine Krichene,et al.  World crude oil and natural gas: a demand and supply model , 2002 .

[3]  E. Worrell,et al.  Barriers to energy efficiency in industrial bottom-up energy demand models—A review , 2011 .

[4]  Joachim Schleich,et al.  The Economics Of Energy Efficiency: Barriers to Cost-Effective Investment , 2004 .

[5]  Gjalt Huppes,et al.  Cost of energy and environmental policy in Portuguese CO2 abatement—scenario analysis to 2020 , 2008 .

[6]  Thomas M. Lenard Renewable Electricity Standards, Energy Efficiency, and Cost-Effective Climate-Change Policy , 2009 .

[7]  Energy Agency World Energy Outlook 2007 : China and India Insights , 2007 .

[8]  Richard Loulou,et al.  Energy Technology Systems Analysis Programme , 2005 .

[9]  Aie World Energy Outlook 2007 , 2007 .

[10]  Joachim Schleich,et al.  Barriers to energy efficiency: A comparison across the German commercial and services sector , 2009 .

[11]  K. Asmal Dams and development: a new framework for decision-making. The report of the World Commission on dams. , 2000 .

[12]  Russ Hans Peter,et al.  Global Climate Policy Scenarios for 2030 and beyond - Analysis of Greenhouse Gas Emission Reduction Pathway Scenarios with the POLES and GEM-E3 Models , 2007 .

[13]  Wcd Dams and development: A new framework for decision-making , 2000 .

[14]  A. Jaffe,et al.  The energy-efficiency gap What does it mean? , 1994 .