Evolutionary Engineering of Complex Functional Networks

Complex biological networks are responsible for many fundamental processes in living organisms, including signal transduction and genetic expression in biological cells and signal processing in neural networks. These functional networks, a product of the evolution, are characterized by their robustness against damages, mutations and noise. Functionality and robustness are reflected in their architectures which exhibit structures different from random networks and lattices. To design functional networks, robust against local damages and noise, and to study, how the requirements of functionality and robustness are reflected in their architecture, are the objectives of this work. Our studies are performed using a model of flow distribution networks representing a simplification of biological signal transduction systems. In the model, networks process signals (fluxes) passing from input to output nodes, and generate output patterns which define the function of a network. The design of networks with prescribed functions (output patterns) is performed by using an evolutionary process of mutations and selections. Furthermore, not only functionality, but also the requirements of different kinds of robustness are imposed in the network design. Three criteria of robustness are considered: robustness against the deletion of randomly chosen nodes or links and robustness against distributed noise. Remarkable differences between architectures of the designed networks, depending on the criteria of robustness imposed during their construction, are observed. Particularly, motif distributions of these networks are different. Comparing them with real biological networks, we have found that the networks robust against deletion of links show motif distributions which are very similar to those of some neural systems and to the development transcription and signal transduction networks of biological macroorganisms. An evolutionary process, similar to that used to construct robust networks, has been employed in a reverse engineering problem. Using it, we have constructed networks with given Laplacian spectra. We have demostrated that construction of networks with a prescribed Laplacian spectrum is possible. Statistical structural properties of families of cospectral graphs have been analyzed.

[1]  Fan Chung,et al.  Spectral Graph Theory , 1996 .

[2]  S. Shen-Orr,et al.  Superfamilies of Evolved and Designed Networks , 2004, Science.

[3]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Error and attack tolerance of complex networks , 2000, Nature.

[4]  S Bornholdt,et al.  Robustness as an evolutionary principle , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[5]  S. Shen-Orr,et al.  Network motifs: simple building blocks of complex networks. , 2002, Science.

[6]  A. S. Mikhailov Engineering of Dynamical Systems for Pattern Recognition and Information Processing , 1989 .

[7]  Alexander S Mikhailov,et al.  Evolutionary reconstruction of networks. , 2002, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[8]  Reinhart Heinrich,et al.  Mathematical models of protein kinase signal transduction. , 2002, Molecular cell.

[9]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Statistical mechanics of complex networks , 2001, ArXiv.

[10]  Yoshiki Kuramoto,et al.  Chemical Oscillations, Waves, and Turbulence , 1984, Springer Series in Synergetics.

[11]  J. Stelling,et al.  Robustness of Cellular Functions , 2004, Cell.

[12]  C. D. Gelatt,et al.  Optimization by Simulated Annealing , 1983, Science.

[13]  Ting Chen,et al.  Modeling Gene Expression with Differential Equations , 1998, Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing.

[14]  Hiroshi Kori,et al.  Strong effects of network architecture in the entrainment of coupled oscillator systems. , 2006, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[15]  Upinder S Bhalla,et al.  A Spectrum of Models of Signaling Pathways , 2004, Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology.

[16]  P. Swain,et al.  Stochastic Gene Expression in a Single Cell , 2002, Science.

[17]  A. Mikhailov,et al.  Entrainment of randomly coupled oscillator networks by a pacemaker. , 2004, Physical review letters.

[18]  Alexander S. Mikhailov,et al.  Foundations of Synergetics II , 1990 .

[19]  Satoru Miyano,et al.  Identification of Genetic Networks from a Small Number of Gene Expression Patterns Under the Boolean Network Model , 1998, Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing.

[20]  Mark E. J. Newman,et al.  The Structure and Function of Complex Networks , 2003, SIAM Rev..

[21]  G. Wagner,et al.  EVOLUTION AND DETECTION OF GENETIC ROBUSTNESS , 2003 .

[22]  Ronald W. Davis,et al.  Role of duplicate genes in genetic robustness against null mutations , 2003, Nature.

[23]  A. Mikhailov,et al.  Emergence of Dynamical Order: Synchronization Phenomena in Complex Systems , 2004 .

[24]  S. Brenner,et al.  The structure of the nervous system of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. , 1986, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[25]  S. Leibler,et al.  Robustness in simple biochemical networks , 1997, Nature.

[26]  A. Mikhailov Foundations of Synergetics I: Distributed Active Systems , 1991 .

[27]  Rudolf Friedrich,et al.  Evolution of Dynamical Structures in Complex Systems , 1992 .

[28]  Frank Schacherer,et al.  The TRANSPATH signal transduction database: a knowledge base on signal transduction networks , 2001, Bioinform..

[29]  Stuart A. Kauffman,et al.  The origins of order , 1993 .

[30]  Oliver Ebenhöh,et al.  Expanding Metabolic Networks: Scopes of Compounds, Robustness, and Evolution , 2005, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[31]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks , 1998, Nature.

[32]  Albert,et al.  Emergence of scaling in random networks , 1999, Science.

[33]  S. Reppert,et al.  Coordination of circadian timing in mammals , 2002, Nature.

[34]  Martin Vingron,et al.  Design and statistical properties of robust functional networks: a model study of biological signal transduction. , 2007, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[35]  J. Raser,et al.  Noise in Gene Expression: Origins, Consequences, and Control , 2005, Science.

[36]  S. N. Dorogovtsev,et al.  Evolution of networks , 2001, cond-mat/0106144.

[37]  Q. Ouyang,et al.  The yeast cell-cycle network is robustly designed. , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[38]  K. Sneppen,et al.  Specificity and Stability in Topology of Protein Networks , 2002, Science.

[39]  D. Cvetkovic,et al.  Spectra of graphs : theory and application , 1995 .

[40]  Lada A. Adamic,et al.  Internet: Growth dynamics of the World-Wide Web , 1999, Nature.

[41]  Gene H. Golub,et al.  Matrix computations , 1983 .

[42]  Ben Taskar,et al.  Rich probabilistic models for gene expression , 2001, ISMB.

[43]  E. Lalli,et al.  Signal transduction and gene regulation: the nuclear response to cAMP. , 1994, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[44]  U. Alon,et al.  Robustness in bacterial chemotaxis , 2022 .

[45]  S. Havlin,et al.  Optimization of network robustness to waves of targeted and random attacks. , 2004, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[46]  S. Shen-Orr,et al.  Network motifs in the transcriptional regulation network of Escherichia coli , 2002, Nature Genetics.

[47]  Hermann Haken,et al.  On the foundations of synergetics , 1996 .

[48]  Monika Sharma,et al.  Chemical oscillations , 2006 .

[49]  A. Mikhailov Artificial Life: An Engineering Perspective , 1992 .

[50]  Sara J. Aton,et al.  Come Together, Right…Now: Synchronization of Rhythms in a Mammalian Circadian Clock , 2005, Neuron.

[51]  Alexander S. Mikhailov,et al.  Evolutionary design of functional networks robust against noise , 2007 .

[52]  M. Savageau,et al.  Parameter Sensitivity as a Criterion for Evaluating and Comparing the Performance of Biochemical Systems , 1971, Nature.

[53]  D S Callaway,et al.  Network robustness and fragility: percolation on random graphs. , 2000, Physical review letters.

[54]  Alexander S. Mikhailov,et al.  From Cells to Societies: Models of Complex Coherent Action. Authorized translation from the English edition published by Springer-Verlag , 2006 .

[55]  Alexander S. Mikhailov,et al.  From Cells to Societies: Models of Complex Coherent Action. Authorized translation from the English edition published by Springer-Verlag , 2006 .

[56]  Alexander S. Mikhailov,et al.  Distributed active systems , 1994 .

[57]  Ronald W. Davis,et al.  Functional profiling of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome , 2002, Nature.

[58]  H. Sauro,et al.  Quantitative analysis of signaling networks. , 2004, Progress in biophysics and molecular biology.

[59]  K. Fujimoto,et al.  Noisy signal amplification in ultrasensitive signal transduction. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[60]  Tommi S. Jaakkola,et al.  Physical Network Models , 2004, J. Comput. Biol..

[61]  Shawn R. Lockery,et al.  Computational Rules for Chemotaxis in the Nematode C. elegans , 1999, Journal of Computational Neuroscience.

[62]  W. Lim,et al.  Deciphering the message in protein sequences: tolerance to amino acid substitutions. , 1990, Science.

[63]  E. Ruppin,et al.  Multiple knockout analysis of genetic robustness in the yeast metabolic network , 2006, Nature Genetics.

[64]  Timothy S Gardner,et al.  Reverse-engineering transcription control networks. , 2005, Physics of life reviews.

[65]  Alan M. Frieze,et al.  Random graphs , 2006, SODA '06.