Exploring Initiative Interactions on a Proxemic and Ambient Public Screen

Public screens are common in modern society, and provide information services to audiences. However, as more and more screens are installed, it becomes a burden for users to find information concerning themselves quickly. This is because screens cannot understand what users really need, they only display pre-designed information related to a certain location. To ensure better cohabitation between people and screens, one solution is to make screens understand users rather than make users understand screens. Given that it is difficult, even for humans, to interpret other people’s intentions, it is far harder for screens to understand users. We need first to decide which kinds of information about users could be helpful for a screen to estimate to users’ needs. In this paper, we study a public interactive screen, which can speculate as to users’ intentions by interpreting their proxemic attributes (such as distance, movement, etc.) and context information (identity, locations, etc.). Based on proxemic interaction semantics, we built an interactive public screen, which: 1) could interpret users’ needs in advance and display relevant information; 2) be available for multi-users and display distinct information to them; 3) be open for data exchanges with users’ mobile devices. Through a lab study, we demonstrate that the screen presented in this paper is more attractive to users and could provide users with useful information more rapidly and precisely than traditional screens.

[1]  Saul Greenberg,et al.  Informing the Design of Proxemic Interactions , 2012, IEEE Pervasive Computing.

[2]  Nicolai Marquardt,et al.  Proxemic interactions: the new ubicomp? , 2011, INTR.

[3]  Daniel Vogel,et al.  Interactive public ambient displays: transitioning from implicit to explicit, public to personal, interaction with multiple users , 2004, UIST '04.

[4]  Nicolai Marquardt,et al.  The proximity toolkit: prototyping proxemic interactions in ubiquitous computing ecologies , 2011, UIST.

[5]  James T. Miller,et al.  An Empirical Evaluation of the System Usability Scale , 2008, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[6]  Alireza Sahami Shirazi,et al.  Interaction techniques for creating and exchanging content with public displays , 2013, CHI.

[7]  E. Hall,et al.  The Hidden Dimension , 1970 .

[8]  Nicolas Roussel,et al.  Using distance as an interface in a video communication system , 2003, IHM '03.

[9]  Tao Xu,et al.  Direct migrator: Eliminating borders between personal mobile devices and pervasive displays , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communication Workshops (PERCOM WORKSHOPS).

[10]  Wendy Ju,et al.  Range: exploring implicit interaction through electronic whiteboard design , 2008, CSCW.

[11]  Chris Harrison,et al.  TapSense: enhancing finger interaction on touch surfaces , 2011, UIST.

[12]  Keith Cheverst,et al.  Exploring bluetooth based mobile phone interaction with the hermes photo display , 2005, Mobile HCI.