Bone-patellar tendon-bone grafts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: the effects of graft pretensioning.

Viscoelastic creep is a well-known phenomenon associated with collagenous soft tissues under sustained tensile load. Despite our understanding of this phenomenon and the potential for "loosening" of the graft over time, pretensioning of bone-patellar tendon-bon (B-PT-B) grafts for reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) to eliminate this elastic deformation is not commonly practiced. This investigation quantified viscoelastic creep in B-PT-B grafts using both an in vivo and an in vitro model. In vivo, 10-mm B-PT-B grafts were procured and prepared in a standard manner for arthroscopically assisted ACL reconstruction. A total of 153 grafts were evaluated. During preparation, each graft was tensioned using a commercially available graft preparation board (Smith & Nephew DonJoy). An initial tensile load of 2.25 N (0.5 lb) was applied to the graft and a measurement was taken between bone-tendon junctions at either end. A sustained load of 89 N (20 lb) was then applied for a minimum of 4 minutes and the measurement repeated. In the in vitro model, grafts were harvested in a standard manner, then placed in a servohydraulic for tensile loading. A differential variable reluctance transducer was implanted in each graft to quantify net displacement during 15 minutes of sustained tensile loading at 89 N (20 lb). A total of 13 specimens were evaluated. In the in vivo model, mean pretension bone-tendon junction length was 43.6 mm (range, 29 to 64 mm; SD, +/- 6.7). Mean post-tension bone-tendon length was 49.6 mm (range, 33 to 71 mm; SD, +/- 7.1), representing a mean increase in length of 6.0 mm (range, 2 to 12; SD, +/- 2.1) or 14.0% (range, 3.8 to 28.6; SD, +/- 5.2). In the in vitro model, the mean pretension tendon length was 42.81 m (range, 35.20 to 51.48; SD, 4.54). The mean post-tension length was 47.11 mm (range, 38.05 to 56.23; SD, +/- 5.04) representing a mean increase of 4.30 mm or 10.12%. These data would seem to support the hypothesis that without pretensioning, significant postimplantation graft creep will occur.

[1]  F. Noyes,et al.  Biomechanical analysis of human ligament grafts used in knee-ligament repairs and reconstructions. , 1984, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[2]  B. Hillen,et al.  Intra-articular reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. An experimental study of length changes in different ligament reconstructions. , 1984, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[3]  M. S. Hefzy,et al.  Anterior cruciate ligament replacements: A mechanical study of femoral attachment location, flexion angle at tensioning, and initial tension , 1990, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[4]  S. Woo,et al.  Use of patellar tendon autograft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the rabbit: A long‐term histologic and biomechanical study , 1989, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[5]  G. Drouin,et al.  Load elongation behavior of the canine anterior cruciate ligament. , 1980, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[6]  Shinichi Yoshiya,et al.  Graft tension in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction , 1987, The American journal of sports medicine.

[7]  B. Drompp,et al.  Evaluation of Tensile Strength of Reconstructions of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament Using the Patellar Tendon in Dogs: A Preliminary Report , 1966, Southern medical journal.

[8]  R. Vanderby,et al.  Effect of preconditioning on the viscoelastic response of primate patellar tendon. , 1994, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[9]  R. Hawkins,et al.  Tension studies of human knee ligaments. Yield point, ultimate failure, and disruption of the cruciate and tibial collateral ligaments. , 1976, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[10]  R. Burks,et al.  Determination of graft tension before fixation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. , 1988, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[11]  J. Gillquist,et al.  The value of intraoperative isometry measurements in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: an in vivo correlation between substitute tension and length change. , 1993, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[12]  M J Askew,et al.  The effects of graft tensioning on the laxity and kinematics of the anterior cruciate ligament reconstructed knee. , 1991, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[13]  K. Kaufman,et al.  Fate of the ACL-injured Patient , 1994, The American journal of sports medicine.

[14]  Clancy Wg Intra-articular reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. , 1985 .