TransRadial versus transUlnar artery approach for elective invasive percutaneous coronary interventions: a randomized trial on the feasibility and safety with ultrasonographic outcome – RAUL study

Introduction Transradial access (TRA) for coronary angiography (CAG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is superior to transfemoral access (TFA). Transulnar access (TUA) is an alternative to TRA. Aim To compare the efficacy and safety of TRA vs. TUA in patients scheduled for CAG or PCI. Material and methods This was a prospective, single-center, randomized study conducted between 2013 and 2016. Two hundred patients referred for the first elective CAG were included in the study. Eligible patients were then randomly assigned to the TRA or TUA group. Before and after the invasive procedure, all patients underwent ultrasonographic measurements of the right upper limb arteries. Results The primary endpoint was efficacy, defined as a successful CAG without a crossover of vascular access. The secondary endpoint was safety, assessed as the number of vascular complications. Successful coronary angiography via the access site was 95% vs. 75% in the TRA vs. TUA groups, respectively (p < 0.001). It depended on the anatomy of UA and the operator experience. No differences were observed in early and late follow-up complications. Conclusions TRA was superior to TUA with regard to efficacy. TUA occurred a safe approach for CAG and PCI and could be used as an alternative method of forearm access.

[1]  Lewandowski Pawel,et al.  Efficacy and safety of kaolin-based hemostatic pad vs. standard mechanical compression following transradial and transulnar access for elective coronary angiography and PCI: RAUL trial substudy , 2019, Heart and Vessels.

[2]  R. Fernandez,et al.  Safety and efficacy of ulnar artery approach for percutaneous cardiac catheterization: Systematic review and meta‐analysis , 2018, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[3]  Sunil V. Rao,et al.  Radial Versus Femoral Access for Coronary Interventions Across the Entire Spectrum of Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials. , 2016, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[4]  K. Korr,et al.  Transulnar versus transradial access for coronary angiography or percutaneous coronary intervention: A meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials , 2016, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[5]  F. Baumann,et al.  Real Time Intraprocedural Ultrasound Measurements of the Radial and Ulnar Arteries in 565 Consecutive Patients Undergoing Cardiac Catheterization and/or Percutaneous Coronary Intervention via the Wrist: Understanding Anatomy and Anomalies May Improve Access Success. , 2015, Journal of interventional cardiology.

[6]  M. Valgimigli,et al.  Radial versus femoral access in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing invasive management: a randomised multicentre trial , 2015, The Lancet.

[7]  L. Xue,et al.  A comparative study of transulnar and transradial artery access for percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute coronary syndrome. , 2014, Journal of interventional cardiology.

[8]  Yanbo Wang,et al.  Safety and feasibility of transulnar versus transradial artery approach for coronary catheterization in non‐selective patients , 2014, Chinese medical journal.

[9]  I. Xanthopoulou,et al.  Transulnar Compared With Transradial Artery Approach as a Default Strategy for Coronary Procedures: A Randomized Trial The Transulnar or Transradial Instead of Coronary Transfemoral Angiographies Study (The AURA of ARTEMIS Study) , 2013, Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions.

[10]  A. Labrunie,et al.  Transulnar approach as an alternative access site for coronary invasive procedures after transradial approach failure. , 2012, American heart journal.

[11]  Sunil V. Rao,et al.  Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography and intervention in patients with acute coronary syndromes (RIVAL): a randomised, parallel group, multicentre trial , 2011, The Lancet.

[12]  Yu-jie Zhou,et al.  Safety and efficacy of transulnar approach for coronary angiography and intervention. , 2010, Chinese medical journal.

[13]  U. Meyerfeldt,et al.  Ablation within the sinus of Valsalva for treatment of supraventricular and ventricular tachycardias: what is known so far? , 2009, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[14]  Hong Jiang,et al.  New access for radiofrequency catheter ablation of left-sided atrioventricular accessory pathways: safety and efficacy of the transradial approach. , 2009, Circulation journal : official journal of the Japanese Circulation Society.

[15]  C. Trani,et al.  Major improvement of percutaneous cardiovascular procedure outcomes with radial artery catheterisation: results from the PREVAIL study , 2008, Heart.

[16]  T. Hong,et al.  Catheter Ablation of a Left Free-Wall Accessory Pathway via the Radial Artery Approach , 2007, Yonsei medical journal.

[17]  P. Poirier,et al.  A Randomized Study Comparing Same-Day Home Discharge and Abciximab Bolus Only to Overnight Hospitalization and Abciximab Bolus and Infusion After Transradial Coronary Stent Implantation , 2006, Circulation.

[18]  K. Bougrini,et al.  Transulnar versus transradial artery approach for coronary angioplasty: The PCVI‐CUBA study , 2006, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[19]  G. Biondi-Zoccai,et al.  Radial versus femoral approach for percutaneous coronary diagnostic and interventional procedures; Systematic overview and meta-analysis of randomized trials. , 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[20]  M. Petch,et al.  Coronary angiography from the radial artery--experience, complications and limitations. , 1998, International journal of cardiology.

[21]  J. Kasprzak,et al.  Ultrasound evaluation of forearm arteries in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention via radial artery access: results of one-year follow-up. , 2015, Kardiologia polska.

[22]  Hong Jiang,et al.  Feasibility and safety of transradial approach for catheter ablation of idiopathic left ventricular tachycardia , 2010, Clinical Research in Cardiology.