Elacestrant (oral selective estrogen receptor degrader) Versus Standard Endocrine Therapy for Estrogen Receptor–Positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2–Negative Advanced Breast Cancer: Results From the Randomized Phase III EMERALD Trial

PURPOSE Patients with pretreated estrogen receptor (ER)–positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)–negative advanced breast cancer have poor prognosis. Elacestrant is a novel, oral selective ER degrader that demonstrated activity in early studies. METHODS This randomized, open-label, phase III trial enrolled patients with ER-positive/HER2-negative advanced breast cancer who had one-two lines of endocrine therapy, required pretreatment with a cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor, and ≤ 1 chemotherapy. Patients were randomly assigned to elacestrant 400 mg orally once daily or standard-of-care (SOC) endocrine monotherapy. Primary end points were progression-free survival (PFS) by blinded independent central review in all patients and patients with detectable ESR1 mutations. RESULTS Patients were randomly assigned to elacestrant (n = 239) or SOC (n = 238). ESR1 mutation was detected in 47.8% of patients, and 43.4% received two prior endocrine therapies. PFS was prolonged in all patients (hazard ratio = 0.70; 95% CI, 0.55 to 0.88; P = .002) and patients with ESR1 mutation (hazard ratio = 0.55; 95% CI, 0.39 to 0.77; P = .0005). Treatment-related grade 3/4 adverse events occurred in 7.2% receiving elacestrant and 3.1% receiving SOC. Treatment-related adverse events leading to treatment discontinuations were 3.4% in the elacestrant arm versus 0.9% in SOC. Nausea of any grade occurred in 35.0% receiving elacestrant and 18.8% receiving SOC (grade 3/4, 2.5% and 0.9%, respectively). CONCLUSION Elacestrant is the first oral selective ER degrader demonstrating a significant PFS improvement versus SOC both in the overall population and in patients with ESR1 mutations with manageable safety in a phase III trial for patients with ER-positive/HER2-negative advanced breast cancer.

[1]  S. Loi,et al.  ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline for the diagnosis, staging and treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer. , 2021, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[2]  G. Hortobagyi,et al.  Chemotherapy and Targeted Therapy for Patients With Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2–Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer That is Either Endocrine-Pretreated or Hormone Receptor–Negative: ASCO Guideline Update , 2021, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[3]  M. Somerfield,et al.  Endocrine Treatment and Targeted Therapy for Hormone Receptor–Positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2–Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer: ASCO Guideline Update , 2021, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[4]  Jeffrey T. Chang,et al.  Serial single-cell genomics reveals convergent subclonal evolution of resistance as early-stage breast cancer patients progress on endocrine plus CDK4/6 therapy , 2021, Nature Cancer.

[5]  P. Neven,et al.  Alpelisib plus fulvestrant in PIK3CA-mutated, hormone receptor-positive advanced breast cancer after a CDK4/6 inhibitor (BYLieve): one cohort of a phase 2, multicentre, open-label, non-comparative study. , 2021, The Lancet. Oncology.

[6]  A. Bardia,et al.  Phase I Study of Elacestrant (RAD1901), a Novel Selective Estrogen Receptor Degrader, in ER-Positive, HER2-Negative Advanced Breast Cancer , 2021, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[7]  H. Burstein Systemic Therapy for Estrogen Receptor-Positive, HER2-Negative Breast Cancer. , 2020, The New England journal of medicine.

[8]  H. Rugo,et al.  Alpelisib Plus Fulvestrant for PIK3CA-Mutated, Hormone Receptor-Positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-2-Negative Advanced Breast Cancer: Final Overall Survival Results From SOLAR-1. , 2020, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[9]  H. Gevensleben,et al.  Circulating tumour DNA analysis to direct therapy in advanced breast cancer (plasmaMATCH): a multicentre, multicohort, phase 2a, platform trial , 2020, The Lancet. Oncology.

[10]  Sung-Bae Kim,et al.  A phase Ib study to evaluate the oral selective estrogen receptor degrader GDC-9545 alone or combined with palbociclib in metastatic ER-positive HER2-negative breast cancer. , 2020 .

[11]  U. Banerji,et al.  A phase I dose escalation and expansion study of the next generation oral SERD AZD9833 in women with ER-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer. , 2020 .

[12]  C. Arteaga,et al.  Elacestrant (RAD1901) exhibits anti-tumor activity in multiple ER+ breast cancer models resistant to CDK4/6 inhibitors , 2019, Breast Cancer Research.

[13]  H. Rugo,et al.  Alpelisib for PIK3CA‐Mutated, Hormone Receptor–Positive Advanced Breast Cancer , 2019, The New England journal of medicine.

[14]  B. Taylor,et al.  The Genomic Landscape of Endocrine-Resistant Advanced Breast Cancers. , 2018, Cancer cell.

[15]  M. Dowsett,et al.  HER2 Testing in Breast Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists Clinical Practice Guideline Focused Update Summary. , 2018, Journal of oncology practice.

[16]  Jeffrey L. Brown,et al.  Elacestrant (RAD1901), a Selective Estrogen Receptor Degrader (SERD), Has Antitumor Activity in Multiple ER+ Breast Cancer Patient-derived Xenograft Models , 2017, Clinical Cancer Research.

[17]  E. Nelson,et al.  Evaluation of the pharmacological activities of RAD1901, a selective estrogen receptor degrader. , 2015, Endocrine-related cancer.

[18]  G. Hattersley,et al.  RAD1901: a novel, orally bioavailable selective estrogen receptor degrader that demonstrates antitumor activity in breast cancer xenograft models , 2015, Anti-cancer drugs.

[19]  James X. Sun,et al.  Emergence of Constitutively Active Estrogen Receptor-α Mutations in Pretreated Advanced Estrogen Receptor–Positive Breast Cancer , 2014, Clinical Cancer Research.

[20]  David Chen,et al.  ESR1 ligand binding domain mutations in hormone-resistant breast cancer , 2013, Nature Genetics.

[21]  M. Piccart,et al.  Everolimus in postmenopausal hormone-receptor-positive advanced breast cancer. , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.

[22]  Anthony Rhodes,et al.  American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline recommendations for immunohistochemical testing of estrogen and progesterone receptors in breast cancer. , 2010, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[23]  A. Milla-Santos,et al.  Anastrozole Versus Tamoxifen as First-Line Therapy in Postmenopausal Patients With Hormone-Dependent Advanced Breast Cancer: A Prospective, Randomized, Phase III Study , 2003, American journal of clinical oncology.

[24]  C. Boni,et al.  Phase III study of letrozole versus tamoxifen as first-line therapy of advanced breast cancer in postmenopausal women: analysis of survival and update of efficacy from the International Letrozole Breast Cancer Group. , 2003, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[25]  R. Pazdur,et al.  FDA drug approval summaries: fulvestrant. , 2002, The oncologist.

[26]  P. Armitage,et al.  Design and analysis of randomized clinical trials requiring prolonged observation of each patient. I. Introduction and design. , 1976, British Journal of Cancer.

[27]  J. Haybittle,et al.  Repeated assessment of results in clinical trials of cancer treatment. , 1971, The British journal of radiology.

[28]  A. Bardia,et al.  EMERALD: Phase III trial of elacestrant (RAD1901) vs endocrine therapy for previously treated ER+ advanced breast cancer. , 2019, Future oncology.

[29]  P. Lønning,et al.  Buparlisib plus fulvestrant in postmenopausal women with hormone-receptor-positive, HER2-negative, advanced breast cancer progressing on or after mTOR inhibition (BELLE-3): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. , 2018, The Lancet. Oncology.

[30]  L. Schwartz,et al.  New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). , 2009, European journal of cancer.

[31]  Chad A. LaGrange,et al.  NCCN CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINES IN ONCOLOGY , 2019 .