Target-enclosed seismic imaging

Seismic reflection data can be redatumed to a specified boundary in the subsurface by solving an inverse (or multidimensional deconvolution) problem. The redatumed data can be interpreted as an extended image of the subsurface at the redatuming boundary, depending on the subsurface offset and time. We retrieve targetenclosed extended images by using two redatuming boundaries, which are selected above and below a specified target volume. As input, we require the upgoing and downgoing wavefields at both redatuming boundaries due to impulsive sources at the earth's surface. These wavefields can be obtained from actual measurements in the subsurface, they can be numerically modeled, or they can be retrieved by solving a multidimensional Marchenko equation. As output, we retrieved virtual reflection and transmission responses as if sources and receivers were located at the two target-enclosing boundaries. These data contain all orders of reflections inside the target volume but exclude all interactions with the part of the medium outside this volume. The retrieved reflection responses can be used to image the target volume from above or from below. We found that the images from above and below are similar (given that the Marchenko equation is used for wavefield retrieval). If a model with sharp boundaries in the target volume is available, the redatumed data can also be used for two-sided imaging, where the retrieved reflection and transmission responses are exploited. Because multiple reflections are used by this strategy, seismic resolution can be improved significantly. Because target-enclosed extended images are independent on the part of the medium outside the target volume, our methodology is also beneficial to reduce the computational burden of localized inversion, which can now be applied inside the target volume only, without suffering from interactions with other parts of the medium.

[1]  A. Bakulin,et al.  Shallow virtual source redatuming by multi‐dimensional deconvolution , 2016 .

[2]  K. Wapenaar,et al.  A representation for Green's function retrieval by multidimensional deconvolution. , 2010, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  Kees Wapenaar,et al.  Reconstructing the primary reflections in seismic data by Marchenko redatuming and convolutional interferometry , 2016 .

[4]  D. J. Verschuur,et al.  Estimating primaries by sparse inversion and application to near-offset data reconstruction , 2009 .

[5]  Andrew Curtis,et al.  Elastic internal multiple analysis and attenuation using Marchenko and interferometric methods , 2017 .

[6]  Evert Slob,et al.  On the role of multiples in Marchenko imaging , 2017 .

[7]  I. Vasconcelos,et al.  Imaging condition for nonlinear scattering-based imaging: Estimate of power loss in scattering , 2012 .

[8]  P. Sava,et al.  Nonlinear extended images via image-domain interferometry , 2010 .

[9]  Kees Wapenaar,et al.  Spurious multiples in seismic interferometry of primaries , 2006 .

[10]  Joost van der Neut,et al.  Using Inverse Transmission Matrices for Marchenko Redatuming in Highly Complex Media , 2015 .

[11]  Evert Slob,et al.  Interferometric redatuming of autofocused primaries and internal multiples , 2013 .

[12]  Roel Snieder,et al.  Source-receiver Marchenko redatuming: Obtaining virtual receivers and virtual sources in the subsurface , 2017 .

[13]  A. Curtis,et al.  Seismic interferometry by multidimensional deconvolution without wavefield separation , 2015 .

[14]  Dirk-Jan van Manen,et al.  Target-oriented velocity analysis using Marchenko-redatumed data , 2017 .

[15]  J. Claerbout Toward a unified theory of reflector mapping , 1971 .

[16]  F. Herrmann,et al.  Robust estimation of primaries by sparse inversion via one-norm minimization , 2013 .

[17]  Matteo Ravasi,et al.  Target-oriented Marchenko imaging of a North Sea field , 2016 .

[18]  Yi Liu,et al.  Combination of surface and borehole seismic data for robust target-oriented imaging , 2016 .

[19]  A. J. Berkhout,et al.  Seismic Migration: Imaging of Acoustic Energy by Wave Field Extrapolation , 1980 .

[20]  Kees Wapenaar,et al.  Focusing the wavefield inside an unknown 1D medium: Beyond seismic interferometry , 2012 .

[21]  G. Schuster,et al.  Least Squares Datuming With the Wave Equation , 2008 .

[22]  Gerard T. Schuster,et al.  A theoretical overview of model-based and correlation-based redatuming methods , 2006 .

[23]  Matteo Ravasi,et al.  Internal multiple prediction and removal using marchenko autofocusing and seismic interferometry , 2015 .

[24]  Roel Snieder,et al.  Improving the virtual source method by wavefield separation , 2007 .

[25]  Joost van der Neut,et al.  Adaptive overburden elimination with the multidimensional Marchenko equation , 2016 .

[26]  A. Curtis,et al.  Beyond conventional migration: non-linear elastic subsalt imaging with transmissions and two-sided illumination , 2014 .

[27]  Michael A. Saunders,et al.  LSQR: An Algorithm for Sparse Linear Equations and Sparse Least Squares , 1982, TOMS.

[28]  Robin Dapp,et al.  Comparing different ultrasound imaging methods for breast cancer detection , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control.

[29]  Lasse Amundsen Elimination of free-surface related multiples without need of the source wavelet , 2001 .

[30]  F. Herrmann,et al.  Estimation of primaries by sparse inversion with scattering-based multiple predictions for data with large gaps , 2016 .

[31]  H. Calandra,et al.  Identification of image artifacts from internal multiples , 2007 .

[32]  J. T. Fokkema,et al.  Chapter 12 – Removal of Surface Related Wave Phenomena , 1993 .

[33]  Lasse Amundsen Elimination of Free Surface-related Multiples Without Need of the Source Wavelet , 1999 .

[34]  D. J. Verschuur,et al.  Full‐wavefield migration: using surface and internal multiples in imaging , 2017 .

[35]  Kees Wapenaar,et al.  Modal expansion of one‐way operators in laterally varying media , 1998 .

[36]  Evert Slob,et al.  Seismic reflector imaging using internal multiples with Marchenko-type equations , 2014 .

[37]  A. Curtis,et al.  Elastic extended images and velocity-sensitive objective functions using multiple reflections and transmissions , 2015 .

[38]  Kees Wapenaar,et al.  Data-driven wavefield focusing and imaging with multidimensional deconvolution: Numerical examples for reflection data with internal multiples , 2014 .

[39]  A. Curtis,et al.  An interferometric theory of source-receiver scattering and imaging , 2010 .

[40]  A. J. Berkhout,et al.  Angle-dependent reflectivity by means of prestack migration , 1990 .

[41]  Felix J. Herrmann,et al.  Fast imaging with surface-related multiples by sparse inversion , 2015 .

[42]  L. Gelius,et al.  Subsurface reflectivity estimation from imaging of primaries and multiples using amplitude-normalized separated wavefields , 2016 .

[43]  Andrey Bakulin,et al.  The virtual source method: Theory and case study , 2006 .

[44]  Matteo Ravasi,et al.  Elastic P- and S-wave autofocus imaging with primaries and internal multiples , 2015 .

[45]  O. K. Youn,et al.  Depth imaging with multiples , 2001 .

[46]  I. Jones,et al.  Seismic imaging in and around salt bodies , 2014 .

[47]  P. M. van den Berg,et al.  Removal of surface-related wave phenomena - The marine case , 1996 .

[48]  Introduction to this special section: Multiples from attenuation to imaging , 2015 .

[49]  Arthur B. Weglein,et al.  Inverse scattering series and seismic exploration , 2003 .

[50]  C. Thomson,et al.  Theory of reflectivity blurring in seismic depth imaging , 2016 .

[51]  Bjørn Ursin,et al.  Seismic Imaging and Illumination with Internal Multiples , 2009 .

[52]  Paul Sava,et al.  Extended imaging conditions for wave‐equation migration , 2011 .

[53]  Ivan Vasconcelos,et al.  On Green’s function retrieval by iterative substitution of the coupled Marchenko equations , 2015 .

[54]  Evert Slob,et al.  Marchenko imaging: Imaging with primaries, internal multiples, and free-surface multiples , 2015 .

[55]  Ivan Vasconcelos,et al.  Broadband extended images by joint inversion of multiple blended wavefields , 2013 .

[56]  Kees Wapenaar,et al.  Autofocus Imaging: Image reconstruction based on inverse scattering theory , 2014 .

[57]  Josef Paffenholz,et al.  Subsalt Multiple Attenuation And Imaging: Observations From the Sigsbee2B Synthetic Dataset , 2002 .

[58]  J. R. Berryhill Wave‐equation datuming before stack , 1984 .

[59]  C. P. A. Wapenaar,et al.  Reciprocity theorems for one-way wavefields , 1996 .

[60]  Peter M. van den Berg,et al.  Removal of Surface-related Wave Phenomena: The Marine Case , 1990 .

[61]  Soon Jee Seol,et al.  Crosswell monitoring using virtual sources and horizontal wells , 2010 .