Evaluating the performance of demographic targeting using gender in sponsored search

In this research, we evaluate the effect of gender targeted advertising on the performance of sponsored search advertising. We analyze nearly 7,000,000 records spanning 33 consecutive months of a keyword advertising campaign from a major US retailer. In order to determine the effect of demographic targeting, we classify the campaign's key phrases by a probability of being targeted for a specific gender, and we then compare the key performance indicators among these groupings using the critical sponsored search metrics of impressions, clicks, cost-per-click, sales revenue, orders, and items, and return on advertising. Findings from our research show that the gender-orientation of the key phrase is a significant determinant in predicting behaviors and performance, with statistically different consumer behaviors for all attributes as the probability of a male or female keyword phrase changes. However, gender neutral phrases perform the best overall, generating 20 times the return of advertising than any gender targeted category. Insight from this research could result in sponsored advertising efforts being more effectively targeted to searchers and potential consumers.

[1]  Russell N. Laczniak,et al.  The effects of gender on processing advertising and product trial information , 2006 .

[2]  Bernard J. Jansen,et al.  Evaluating the effectiveness of and patterns of interactions with automated searching assistance: Research Articles , 2005 .

[3]  Robert E. Smith,et al.  Gender differences in information processing strategies: An empirical test of the selectivity , 1995 .

[4]  Taesik Lee,et al.  Gender differences in consumers’ perception of online consumer reviews , 2011, Electron. Commer. Res..

[5]  Eileen M. Trauth,et al.  Odd girl out: an individual differences perspective on women in the IT profession , 2002, Inf. Technol. People.

[6]  Jacob Cohen Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[7]  E. Wong,et al.  EXPLORING THE ORIGINS AND INFORMATION PROCESSING DIFFERENCES BETWEEN MEN AND WOMEN: IMPLICATIONS FOR ADVERTISERS , 2010 .

[8]  Carlota Lorenzo,et al.  Effects of web experience on consumer choice: a multicultural approach , 2010, Internet Res..

[9]  H. Lindman Analysis of variance in complex experimental designs , 1974 .

[10]  Welch Bl THE GENERALIZATION OF ‘STUDENT'S’ PROBLEM WHEN SEVERAL DIFFERENT POPULATION VARLANCES ARE INVOLVED , 1947 .

[11]  Bassam Hasan,et al.  Exploring gender differences in online shopping attitude , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[12]  H. Dittmar,et al.  Buying on the Internet: Gender Differences in On-line and Conventional Buying Motivations , 2004 .

[13]  Ellen Garbarino,et al.  GENDER DIFFERENCES IN THE PERCEIVED RISK OF BUYING ONLINE AND THE EFFECTS OF RECEIVING A SITE RECOMMENDATION , 2004 .

[14]  David Clark-Carter Quantitative Psychological Research: The Complete Student's Companion , 2018 .

[15]  Donna Harman,et al.  Information Processing and Management , 2022 .

[16]  W. Borman,et al.  A Theory of Individual Differences in Task and Contextual Performance , 1997 .

[17]  Thomas D. Wilson,et al.  Human Information Behavior , 2000, Informing Sci. Int. J. an Emerg. Transdiscipl..

[18]  Daniel C. Fain,et al.  Sponsored search: A brief history , 2006 .

[19]  Thorsten Joachims,et al.  The influence of task and gender on search and evaluation behavior using Google , 2006, Inf. Process. Manag..

[20]  Wei-Ning Yang,et al.  A study of purchasing behavior in Taiwan's online auction websites: Effects of uncertainty and gender differences , 2012, Internet Res..

[21]  Bernard J. Jansen,et al.  Evaluating the effectiveness of and patterns of interactions with automated searching assistance , 2005, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[22]  Amanda Spink,et al.  Investigating customer click through behaviour with integrated sponsored and nonsponsored results , 2009 .

[23]  Frank Ulbrich,et al.  Gender-specific on-line shopping preferences , 2011, Electron. Commer. Res..

[24]  Alice M. Tybout,et al.  Cognitive and Affective Responses to Advertising , 1988 .

[25]  Jinsook Cho,et al.  Likelihood to abort an online transaction: influences from cognitive evaluations, attitudes, and behavioral variables , 2004, Inf. Manag..

[26]  R. Palanisamy,et al.  IMPACT OF GENDER DIFFERENCES ON ONLINE CONSUMER CHARACTERISTICS ON WEB-BASED BANNER ADVERTISING EFFECTIVENESS , 2005 .

[27]  France Bélanger,et al.  Gender differences in perceptions of web-based shopping , 2002, CACM.

[28]  David A. Hull Using statistical testing in the evaluation of retrieval experiments , 1993, SIGIR.

[29]  Lina Zhou,et al.  ONLINE SHOPPING ACCEPTANCE MODEL — A CRITICAL SURVEY OF CONSUMER FACTORS IN ONLINE SHOPPING , 2007 .

[30]  Shelly Rodgers,et al.  Gender and e-commerce: an exploratory study , 2003, Journal of Advertising Research.

[31]  I. Ayres,et al.  Seeing Significance: Is the 95% Probability Range Easier To Perceive? , 2007 .

[32]  ChoJinsook Likelihood to abort an online transaction , 2004 .

[33]  Anindya Ghose,et al.  An empirical analysis of sponsored search performance in search engine advertising , 2008, WSDM '08.

[34]  F. Doré,et al.  Accuracy and Latency of Judgment of Facial Expressions of Emotions , 1983, Perceptual and motor skills.

[35]  A. Huston-Stein,et al.  Activity Structure and Sex-Typed Behavior in Preschool Children. , 1980 .

[36]  S. L. Andersen,et al.  Permutation Theory in the Derivation of Robust Criteria and the Study of Departures from Assumption , 1955 .

[37]  Joan Meyers-Levy,et al.  Gender Differences in the Use of Message Cues and Judgments , 1991 .

[38]  Dianne Cyr,et al.  Gender and website design in e-business , 2005, Int. J. Electron. Bus..

[39]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[40]  Jamshid Beheshti,et al.  Gender differences in collaborative Web searching behavior: an elementary school study , 2002, Inf. Process. Manag..

[41]  Joan Meyers-Levy,et al.  The Influence of Sex Roles on Judgment , 1988 .

[42]  Vincent S. Lai,et al.  Literature derived reference models for the adoption of online shopping , 2005, Inf. Manag..

[43]  V. Prakash,et al.  A Study of Psychological Gender Differences: Applications For Advertising Format , 1985 .

[44]  D. R. Shaffer,et al.  Gender-Role Congruence and Self-Referencing as Determinants of Advertising Effectiveness , 2003 .

[45]  B. L. Welch The generalisation of student's problems when several different population variances are involved. , 1947, Biometrika.

[46]  K. Deaux From individual differences to social categories: analysis of a decade's research on gender , 1984 .

[47]  B. Calder,et al.  New media interactive advertising vs. traditional advertising , 1998 .

[48]  Sally J. McMillan,et al.  Online Marketing Communications , 2009 .

[49]  Joan Meyers-Levy,et al.  Exploring Differences in Males' and Females' Processing Strategies , 1991 .

[50]  Kelly S. Ervin,et al.  Gender and the Internet: Women Communicating and Men Searching , 2001 .

[51]  Bernard J. Jansen,et al.  Sponsored search: an overview of the concept, history, and technology , 2008, Int. J. Electron. Bus..

[52]  D. Cox,et al.  An Analysis of Transformations , 1964 .

[53]  Pradeep Korgaonkar,et al.  Web advertising: gender differences in beliefs, attitudes and behavior , 2003, Internet Res..

[54]  Manuel J. Sánchez-Franco,et al.  Exploring the influence of gender on the web usage via partial least squares , 2006, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[55]  M. Chi,et al.  Gender Differences in Patterns of Searching the Web , 2003 .