A Reduction of Logical Regulatory Graphs Preserving Essential Dynamical Properties

To cope with the increasing complexity of regulatory networks, we define a reduction method for multi-valued logical models. Starting with a detailed model, this method enables the computation of a reduced model by iteratively "hiding" regulatory components. To keep a consistent behaviour, the logical rules associated with the targets of each hidden node are actualised to account for the (indirect) effects of its regulators. The construction of reduced models ensures the preservation of a number of dynamical properties of the original model. In particular, stable states and more complex attractors are conserved. More generally, we focus on the relationship between the attractor configuration of the original model and that of the reduced model, along with the issue of attractor reachability. The power of the reduction method is illustrated by its application to a multi-valued model of the segment-polarity network Controlling segmentation in the fly Drosophila melanogaster.

[1]  Steffen Klamt,et al.  Host-pathogen systems biology: logical modelling of hepatocyte growth factor and Helicobacter pylori induced c-Met signal transduction , 2008, BMC Systems Biology.

[2]  Aurélien Naldi,et al.  Decision Diagrams for the Representation and Analysis of Logical Models of Genetic Networks , 2007, CMSB.

[3]  Denis Thieffry,et al.  Qualitative Analysis of Regulatory Graphs: A Computational Tool Based on a Discrete Formal Framework , 2003, POSTA.

[4]  Aurélien Naldi,et al.  Dynamical analysis of a generic Boolean model for the control of the mammalian cell cycle , 2006, ISMB.

[5]  Giovanni De Micheli,et al.  Synchronous versus asynchronous modeling of gene regulatory networks , 2008, Bioinform..

[6]  Denis Thieffry,et al.  Logical modelling of the role of the Hh pathway in the patterning of the Drosophila wing disc , 2008, ECCB.

[7]  Denis Thieffry,et al.  Segmenting the fly embryo: a logical analysis of the pair-rule cross-regulatory module. , 2003, Journal of theoretical biology.

[8]  Steffen Klamt,et al.  A Logical Model Provides Insights into T Cell Receptor Signaling , 2007, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[9]  Elisabeth Remy,et al.  From minimal signed circuits to the dynamics of Boolean regulatory networks , 2008, ECCB.

[10]  H. Othmer,et al.  The topology of the regulatory interactions predicts the expression pattern of the segment polarity genes in Drosophila melanogaster. , 2003, Journal of theoretical biology.

[11]  René Thomas Regulatory networks seen as asynchronous automata: A logical description , 1991 .

[12]  Tiziano Villa,et al.  Multi-valued decision diagrams: theory and applications , 1998 .

[13]  Ian Stark,et al.  The Continuous pi-Calculus: A Process Algebra for Biochemical Modelling , 2008, CMSB.

[14]  R Thomas,et al.  Dynamical behaviour of biological regulatory networks--I. Biological role of feedback loops and practical use of the concept of the loop-characteristic state. , 1995, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[15]  Madalena Chaves,et al.  Robustness and fragility of Boolean models for genetic regulatory networks. , 2005, Journal of theoretical biology.

[16]  Randal E. Bryant,et al.  Graph-Based Algorithms for Boolean Function Manipulation , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Computers.

[17]  D. Thieffry,et al.  Segmenting the fly embryo: logical analysis of the role of the segment polarity cross-regulatory module. , 2008, The International journal of developmental biology.

[18]  H. Meinhardt,et al.  Hierarchical Inductions of Cell States: A Model for Segmentation in Drosophila , 1986, Journal of Cell Science.

[19]  Aurélien Naldi,et al.  Logical modelling of regulatory networks with GINsim 2.3 , 2009, Biosyst..

[20]  Radu Mateescu,et al.  Temporal logic patterns for querying dynamic models of cellular interaction networks , 2008, ECCB.

[21]  G. Odell,et al.  The segment polarity network is a robust developmental module , 2000, Nature.

[22]  Nicholas T Ingolia,et al.  Topology and Robustness in the Drosophila Segment Polarity Network , 2004, PLoS biology.