Reliability and Validity of Measuring Acetabular Component Orientation by Plain Anteroposterior Radiographs

BackgroundInaccurate placement of an acetabular cup can cause impingement, dislocation, and accelerated wear. However, there is no universally agreed-on approach to measuring cup position using plain radiographs.Objectives/purposesOur goal was to evaluate the reliability and validity of measuring the orientation of acetabular components on plain anteroposterior (AP) radiographs.MethodsWe obtained plain AP radiographs and CT scans for 60 patients who underwent 60 primary total hip arthroplasties (THAs). The method devised by Lewinnek et al. was used to measure the orientation of acetabular components on plain AP radiographs, and three-dimensional (3-D) CT scans were used to measure both the radiographic anteversion angle and the inclination angle. Reliability was evaluated by analysis of the agreement between inter- and intraobserver measurements using plain AP radiographs. Measurements on 3-D CT scans were regarded as the reference standard; validity was assessed by comparing radiographic measurements with the CT scans.ResultsInter- and intraobserver reliability for measuring component orientation on plain AP radiographs was nearly perfect with intraclass correlation coefficients of 0.896 and 0.969 for anteversion and 0.984 and 0.993 for inclination. Measurement of cup inclination angles differed between plain radiographs and CT scans, but the difference was small, and the difference, although statistically significant, probably was not clinically important (2.3° ± 1.8°, p < 0.001). There was no significant difference between the anteversion as measured on CT scan versus that measured on plain radiographs (p = 0.19).ConclusionsMeasurement of the orientation of acetabular components on plain AP radiographs is reliable and accurate compared with measurement on CT.Level of EvidenceLevel II, diagnostic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

[1]  D Resnick,et al.  Evaluation of acetabular anteversion following total hip arthroplasty: necessity of proper centring. , 1975, The British journal of radiology.

[2]  J. Visser,et al.  A new method for measuring angles after total hip arthroplasty. A study of the acetabular cup and femoral component. , 1981, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[3]  Karl-Heinz Widmer,et al.  A simplified method to determine acetabular cup anteversion from plain radiographs. , 2004, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[4]  R. Pradhan,et al.  Planar anteversion of the acetabular cup as determined from plain anteroposterior radiographs. , 1999, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[5]  B. Jaramaz,et al.  A validation model for measurement of acetabular component position. , 2010, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[6]  H. Uhthoff,et al.  Anteversion of the acetabular cup. Measurement of angle after total hip replacement. , 1986, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[7]  D. Murray The definition and measurement of acetabular orientation. , 1993, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[8]  B. Morrey,et al.  Effects of acetabular abduction on cup wear rates in total hip arthroplasty. , 1998, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[9]  J. Lewis,et al.  Dislocations after total hip-replacement arthroplasties. , 1978, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[10]  F. Layher,et al.  The rationale for tilt-adjusted acetabular cup navigation. , 2008, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[11]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[12]  B F Morrey,et al.  Dislocations after total hip arthroplasty. , 1982, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[13]  Lars Perlick,et al.  Position of the acetabular cup -- accuracy of radiographic calculation compared to CT-based measurement. , 2006, European journal of radiology.

[14]  B. Jolles,et al.  Factors predisposing to dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty: a multivariate analysis. , 2002, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[15]  L. G. Watson,et al.  Radiographic calculation of anteversion in acetabular prostheses. , 1995, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[16]  Stephen Lyman,et al.  CT Outperforms Radiography for Determination of Acetabular Cup Version after THA , 2009, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[17]  B. Jaramaz,et al.  Imaging and Navigation Measurement of Acetabular Component Position in THA , 2009, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[18]  Dohyung Lim,et al.  Validation of a computer navigation system and a CT method for determination of the orientation of implanted acetabular cup in total hip arthroplasty: a cadaver study. , 2008, Clinical biomechanics.

[19]  Gerald Q. Maguire,et al.  A new CT method for measuring cup orientation after total hip arthroplastyA study of 10 patients , 2004, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[20]  Y-K Lee,et al.  Reliability and validity of measuring version of the acetabular component. , 2012, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[21]  Matthias Wiese,et al.  Misinterpretation of cup anteversion in total hip arthroplasty using planar radiography , 2006, Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery.

[22]  A. Toms,et al.  A reliability study of measurement tools available on standard picture archiving and communication system workstations for the evaluation of hip radiographs following arthroplasty. , 2011, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[23]  K. Soffe,et al.  Effect of acetabular component orientation on recurrent dislocation, pelvic osteolysis, polyethylene wear, and component migration. , 1998, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[24]  Chiou-Shann Fuh,et al.  A New Tool for Measuring Cup Orientation in Total Hip Arthroplasties from Plain Radiographs , 2006, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[25]  S. Weinstein,et al.  The natural history and long-term follow-up of Scheuermann kyphosis. , 1993, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[26]  R. Barrack,et al.  Virtual reality computer animation of the effect of component position and design on stability after total hip arthroplasty. , 2001, The Orthopedic clinics of North America.

[27]  P. Asbach,et al.  3D CT analysis of combined cup and stem anteversion in cases of cup navigation in hip arthroplasty. , 2010, Orthopedics.

[28]  W. Kumpan,et al.  Accuracy of navigation-assisted acetabular component positioning studied by computed tomography measurements: methods and results. , 2007, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[29]  B. Mckibbin,et al.  Anatomical factors in the stability of the hip joint in the newborn. , 1970, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[30]  Branislav Jaramaz,et al.  Comparison of a mechanical acetabular alignment guide with computer placement of the socket. , 2002, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[31]  Jens Kowal,et al.  Validation of a new method for determination of cup orientation in THA , 2009, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.