A survey of issues and approaches to remote laboratory adoption by teacher-academics

Adoption is a key concern for those interested addressing the underutilization of remote engineering instructional laboratories (REIL). Lessons from related areas of technology adoption research are identified, presented, and related to REIL adoption. The REIL adoption perspective taken is that of the individual teacher-academic engaged in some aspect of engineering education which features laboratory work.

[1]  Lawrence A. Crowl,et al.  Distance learning applied to control engineering laboratories , 1996 .

[2]  Tilman Wolf,et al.  Assessing Student Learning in a Virtual Laboratory Environment , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Education.

[3]  Denis Gillet,et al.  Challenges in Remote Laboratory Sustainability , 2007 .

[4]  Yiping Lou,et al.  Technology Adoption into Teaching and Learning by Mainstream University Faculty: A Mixed Methodology Study Revealing the “How, When, Why, and Why Not” , 2008 .

[5]  Mohammad Chuttur,et al.  Overview of the Technology Acceptance Model: Origins, Developments and Future Directions , 2009 .

[6]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Learning from Notes: organizational issues in groupware implementation , 1992, CSCW '92.

[7]  Donald A. Schön,et al.  The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. , 1987 .

[8]  Franziska Zellweger Moser.  Faculty Adoption of Educational Technology , 2007 .

[9]  Janet Buckenmeyer.  Revisiting Teacher Adoption Of Technology: Research Implications And Recommendations For Successful Full Technology Integration , 2011 .

[10]  Jonathan Grudin,et al.  Why Groupware Succeeds: Discretion or Mandate? , 1995, ECSCW.

[11]  Luís Gomes,et al.  Current Trends in Remote Laboratories , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[12]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Technology Acceptance Model 3 and a Research Agenda on Interventions , 2008, Decis. Sci..

[13]  Dawn Michele Jacobsen.  Adoption patterns and characteristics of faculty who integrate computer technology for teaching and learning in higher education , 1998 .

[14]  Martyn Cooper.  Remote laboratories in teaching and learning - issues impinging on widespread adoption in science and engineering education , 2005, Int. J. Online Eng..

[15]  Euan Lindsay,et al.  Effects of laboratory access modes upon learning outcomes , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Education.

[16]  Peggy A. Ertmer.  Teacher pedagogical beliefs: The final frontier in our quest for technology integration? , 2005 .

[17]  Martyn Cooper,et al.  Remote Laboratories Extending Access to Science and Engineering Curricular , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies.

[18]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Learning from Notes: organizational issues in groupware implementation , 1992, CSCW '92.

[19]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of innovations , 1964, Encyclopedia of Sport Management.

[20]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[21]  Lydia Kyei-Blankson,et al.  Faculty and Technology: Implications for Faculty Training and Technology Leadership , 2009 .

[22]  K. Frank,et al.  Factors Affecting Technology Uses in Schools: An Ecological Perspective , 2003 .

[23]  Dikai Liu,et al.  Evolving Remote Laboratory Architectures to Leverage Emerging Internet Technologies , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies.

[24]  D. Schoen,et al.  The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action , 1985 .

[25]  Tilman Wolf,et al.  Teaching experiences with a virtual network laboratory , 2007, SIGCSE '07.

[26]  G. Cziko,et al.  Teacher Adoption of Technology: A Perceptual Control Theory Perspective , 2001 .

[27]  M. L. Levin,et al.  Traditions of Research on the Diffusion of Innovation , 1963 .

[28]  Gustavo Ribeiro Alves,et al.  An Integrated Reusable Remote Laboratory to Complement Electronics Teaching , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies.