Fashion in the Classroom: Effects of Attire on Student Perceptions of Instructors in College Classes.

This study was conducted to investigate contemporary effects of instructor attire (specifically, graduate teaching assistant attire) on students' perceptions of college teachers in a live lecture context. Effects of three dress conditions, formal professional, casual professional, and casual, were tested under tightly controlled experimental conditions. Results indicated that more formal dress (business suits, dress shoes) was associated with increased ratings of instructor competence, particularly for female students rating female instructors. However, contrary to common assumptions, the most positive influences of instructor dress were found in the highly casual condition (faded jeans, T‐shirt, flannel shirt). Perceptions of homophily accounted for a small amount of variance in instructor ratings, but there was no significant effect of dress condition on ratings of homophily. Overall findings suggest that caution be used in drawing conclusions regarding potential payoffs of professional classroom dress ...

[1]  M. Singer,et al.  The effect of police uniform on interpersonal perception. , 1985 .

[2]  John T. Molloy,et al.  Dress for Success , 1975 .

[3]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  Statistical Power Analysis For The Behavioral Sciences Revised Edition , 1987 .

[4]  J. Mccroskey,et al.  THE DEVELOPMENT OF A MEASURE OF PERCEIVED HOMOPHILY IN INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION , 1975 .

[5]  J. A. Edinger,et al.  Nonverbal involvement and social control. , 1983 .

[6]  J. Whitehead,et al.  Effects of source attire on judgments of credibility , 1979 .

[7]  Steven A. Rollman.  Some Effects of Teachers' Styles of Dress. , 1980 .

[8]  Franklin G. Miller,et al.  Attire, Sex-Roles, and Responses to Requests for Directions , 1980 .

[9]  James C. McCroskey,et al.  An introduction to communication in the classroom , 1992 .

[10]  J. Mccroskey,et al.  Ethos and credibility: The construct and its measurement after three decades , 1981 .

[11]  M. Harris,et al.  Clothing: Communication, Compliance, and Choice , 1983 .

[12]  Leonard Bickman,et al.  The social power of a uniform. , 1974 .

[13]  J. Mccroskey,et al.  THE EFFECT OF INTERACTION BEHAVIOR ON SOURCE CREDIBILITY, HOMOPHILY, AND INTERPERSONAL ATTRACTION , 1974 .

[14]  L. Aiken.  The Relationships of Dress to Selected Measures of Personality in Undergraduate Women , 1963 .

[15]  Virginia P. Richmond,et al.  The Relationship Between Selected Immediacy Behaviors and Cognitive Learning , 1987 .

[16]  Kenneth P. de Meuse,et al.  A review of the effects of non-verbal cues on the performance appraisal process , 1987 .

[17]  E. Goffman.  The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life , 1959 .

[18]  Mark I. Alpert,et al.  Optimal Heterophily and Communication Effectiveness: Some Empirical Findings , 1973 .

[19]  J. Mccroskey,et al.  Fundamentals of Human Communication: An Interpersonal Perspective , 1995 .

[20]  R. R. Blake,et al.  Status factors in pedestrain violation of traffic signals. , 1955, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[21]  Jacob Cohen.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[22]  William I. Gorden,et al.  Women's clothing predispositions as predictors of dress at work, job satisfaction, and career advancement , 1982 .

[23]  M. Hickson,et al.  NVC, nonverbal communication: Studies and applications , 1985 .

[24]  W. E. Hensley.  The effects of attire, location, and sex on aiding behavior: A similarity explanation , 1981 .

[25]  Presentational and affect-management functions of nonverbal involvement , 1987 .

[26]  Michael R. Solomon,et al.  Self-Consciousness and Clothing , 1982 .

[27]  D. Morris.  Manwatching : a field guide to human behaviour , 1977 .

[28]  D. Byrne.  Interpersonal attraction and attitude similarity. , 1961, Journal of abnormal and social psychology.

[29]  T. Hoult.  Experimental Measurement of Clothing as a Factor in Some Social Ratings of Selected American Men , 1954 .

[30]  J. Mccroskey.  Measurement of the Credibility of Peers and Spouses. , 1973 .

[31]  E. Rogers,et al.  HOMOPHILY-HETEROPHILY: RELATIONAL CONCEPTS FOR COMMUNICATION RESEARCH , 1970 .

[32]  Virginia P. Richmond,et al.  Power in the classroom VI: Verbal control strategies, nonverbal immediacy and affective learning , 1986 .

[33]  Diane M. Christophel,et al.  The Relationship of Teachers' Use of Humor in the Classroom to Immediacy and Student Learning. , 1990 .