The impact of product architecture on global operations network design

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to explore how integral and modular product architectures influence the design properties of the global operations network. Design/methodology/approach The authors perform a multiple-case study of three global manufacturing companies, using interviews, seminars and structured questionnaires to identify ideal design properties. Findings The authors find that the choice of integral vs modular product architecture lead to significant differences in the preferred design properties of global operations networks concerning number of key technologies in-house, number of capable plants, focus at assembly plants, distance between assembly plant and market, and number of key supplier sites. Two of these were identified through this research, i.e. the number of capable plants and number of key supplier sites. The authors make a distinction between component and assembly plants, which adds detail to the understanding of the impact of product architecture on global operations. In addition, they develop five propositions that can be tested in further survey research. Research limitations/implications This study is restricted to three large manufacturing companies with global operations. However, the authors investigated both integral and modular products at these three companies and their associated global operations network. Still, further case or survey research involving a broader set of companies is warranted. Practical implications The key aspects for integral products are to have many key technologies in-house, concentration of production at a few capable plants, and economies-of-scale at assembly plants, while long distances between assembly plants and markets as well as few key supplier sites are acceptable. For modular products, the key aspects are many capable plants, economies-of-scope at assembly plants, short distance between assembly plants and markets, and many key supplier sites, while key technologies do not necessarily have to reside in-house – these can be accessed via key suppliers. Originality/value This paper is, to the authors’ knowledge, the first study on the explicit impact of product architecture on global operations networks, especially considering the internal manufacturing network.

[1]  Kasra Ferdows,et al.  Shaping global operations , 2009 .

[2]  Glen M. Schmidt,et al.  Matching Product Architecture and Supply Chain Configuration , 2010 .

[3]  K. Eisenhardt Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[4]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  The role of product architecture in the manufacturing firm , 2011 .

[5]  Sebastian K. Fixson,et al.  Product architecture assessment: a tool to link product, process, and supply chain design decisions , 2005 .

[6]  Charles H. Fine,et al.  Modeling tradeoffs in three-dimensional concurrent engineering: a goal programming approach , 2005 .

[7]  Christopher A. Voss,et al.  Case research in operations management , 2002 .

[8]  Juliana H. Mikkola,et al.  Capturing the Degree of Modularity Embedded in Product Architectures , 2006 .

[9]  Linda S. Lotto Qualitative Data Analysis: A Sourcebook of New Methods , 1986 .

[10]  M. Porter Competition in Global Industries , 1986 .

[11]  D. L. Parnas,et al.  On the criteria to be used in decomposing systems into modules , 1972, Software Pioneers.

[12]  Anja Feldmann,et al.  Designing and managing manufacturing networks–a survey of Swedish plants , 2009 .

[13]  Melissa A. Schilling Toward a General Modular Systems Theory and Its Application to Interfirm Product Modularity , 2000 .

[14]  Jack R. Meredith,et al.  Building operations management theory through case and field research , 1998 .

[15]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Design Rules: The Power of Modularity , 2000 .

[16]  Antonio K.W. Lau,et al.  Critical success factors in managing modular production design: Six company case studies in Hong Kong, China, and Singapore , 2011 .

[17]  Matthias Holweg,et al.  The Evolution of Competition in the Automotive Industry , 2008 .

[18]  R. V. Hoek,et al.  The Impact of Modular Production on the Dynamics of Supply Chains , 1998 .

[19]  Charles H. Fine CLOCKSPEED‐BASED STRATEGIES FOR SUPPLY CHAIN DESIGN1 , 2009 .

[20]  Jan Olhager,et al.  Product architecture and supply chain design: a systematic review and research agenda , 2015 .

[21]  Henrik Sternberg,et al.  Design of global production and distribution networks: A literature review and research agenda , 2015 .

[22]  Hau L. Lee,et al.  Product universality and design for supply chain management , 1995 .

[23]  Johannes T. Voordijk,et al.  The concept of modularity in supply chains : A multiple case-study in the construction industry , 2006 .

[24]  M. Fisher What is the Right Supply Chain for Your Product , 1997 .

[25]  HERBERT A. SIMON,et al.  The Architecture of Complexity , 1991 .

[26]  Steven C. Wheelwright,et al.  The Product Development Challenge: Competing Through Speed, Quality, and Creativity (A Harvard Business Review Book) (Проблема создания новых продуктов: конкурируя посредством скорости, качества и креативности) , 1995 .

[27]  Richard C.M. Yam,et al.  Supply chain integration and product modularity: An empirical study of product performance for selected Hong Kong manufacturing industries , 2010 .

[28]  W. Firestone,et al.  Multisite Qualitative Policy Research: Optimizing Description and Generalizability , 1983 .

[29]  George Q. Huang,et al.  Simultaneous configuration of platform products and manufacturing supply chains , 2008 .

[30]  Akira Takeishi,et al.  Modularization in the Auto Industry: Interlinked Multiple Hierarchies of Product, Production, and Supplier Systems , 2001 .

[31]  Markus Lang,et al.  The lead factory concept: benefiting from efficient knowledge transfer , 2012 .

[32]  Jan Olhager,et al.  Linking networks and plant roles: the impact of changing a plant role , 2013 .

[33]  S. Fixson,et al.  The Power of Integrality: Linkages between Product Architecture, Innovation, and Industry Structure , 2007 .

[34]  G. Hult,et al.  Bridging organization theory and supply chain management: The case of best value supply chains , 2007 .

[35]  Davide Ravasi,et al.  Product Design: A Review and Research Agenda for Management Studies , 2012 .

[36]  Martin Christopher,et al.  Logistics and supply chain management : creating value-adding networks , 2005 .

[37]  Jan Olhager,et al.  Plant roles: Site competence bundles and their relationships with site location factors and performance , 2013 .

[38]  Jean Hartley,et al.  Case study research , 2004 .

[39]  Timothy J. Sturgeon,et al.  Modular production networks: a new American model of industrial organization , 2002 .

[40]  D. Power,et al.  An empirical investigation of the relationship between product nature and supply chain strategy , 2010 .

[41]  Steven D. Eppinger,et al.  Special Issue on Design and Development: Sourcing By Design: Product Complexity and the Supply Chain , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[42]  Dmitrij Slepniov,et al.  Dynamic roles and locations of manufacturing: Imperatives of alignment and coordination with innovation , 2014 .

[43]  H. Thorelli Networks: Between Markets and Hierarchies , 1986 .

[44]  G. Norman Likert scales, levels of measurement and the “laws” of statistics , 2010, Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice.

[45]  Mike Gregory,et al.  International manufacturing networks—to develop global competitive capabilities , 1998 .

[46]  John Johansen,et al.  Manufacturing network evolution: a manufacturing plant perspective , 2011 .

[47]  B. Tabrizi,et al.  Defining next-generation products: an inside look. , 1997, Harvard business review.

[48]  Charles H. Fine Clockspeed: Winning Industry Control In The Age Of Temporary Advantage , 1998 .