Valence of anticipated evaluation and social facilitation

Abstract An expectancy-based explanation of social performance that focuses on the valence of evaluation that is anticipated from an audience was presented and tested. As was predicted, an interaction between a subject's performance expectations and whether he or she performed alone or in the presence of an evaluative audience was found. Subjects expecting to perform successfully anticipated a positive evaluation from an audience, resulting in improved performance over subjects working alone. Conversely, when subjects expected to perform poorly a negative evaluation was anticipated from an audience, although in the overall analysis social performance decrements did not reach significance. However, a comparison with a performance baseline condition, and a reanalysis of data from subjects who did not receive preliminary performance feedback, indicated that both social facilitation and impairment effects were evident. Results are discussed in terms of an expectancy-based explanation of social performance.

[1]  Paul B. Paulus,et al.  Effects of Group Size and Proximity Under Cooperative and Competitive Conditions , 1976 .

[2]  K. J. Good.  Social facilitation: effects of performance anticipation, evaluation, and response competition on free associations. , 1973, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[3]  Jerry L. Cohen.  Social facilitation , 1980 .

[4]  William Ickes,et al.  Social Facilitation of Human Performance: Mere Presence Effects , 1977 .

[5]  Roy F. Baumeister,et al.  Paradoxical effects of supportive audiences on performance under pressure: The home field disadvantage in sports championships. , 1984 .

[6]  Bernard Guerin,et al.  Mere presence effects in humans: A review , 1986 .

[7]  C. Carver,et al.  The self-attention-induced feedback loop and social facilitation. , 1981 .

[8]  C. F. Bond,et al.  Social facilitation: A self-presentational view. , 1982 .

[9]  G. S. Sanders,et al.  Distraction as a Source of Drive in Social Facilitation Research , 1978 .

[10]  Bernd H. Schmitt,et al.  Mere presence and social facilitation: One more time , 1986 .

[11]  Russell G. Geen.  Effects of being observed on learning following success and failure experiences , 1979 .

[12]  James C. Hamilton,et al.  Public versus private expectancy of success: Confidence booster or performance pressure? , 1985 .

[13]  Barry Schwartz,et al.  The Home Advantage , 1977 .

[14]  J. J. Seta,et al.  Awareness of prior success or failure: A critical factor in task performance. , 1980 .

[15]  H. Markus,et al.  The effect of mere presence on social facilitation: An unobtrusive test , 1978 .

[16]  G. S. Sanders,et al.  Distraction and social comparison as mediators of social facilitation effects , 1978 .

[17]  Paul B. Paulus,et al.  Anticipated evaluation and audience presence in the enhancement of dominant responses , 1971 .

[18]  Franklin G. Miller,et al.  The Drive Theory of Social Facilitation. , 1971 .

[19]  Russell G. Geen.  Effects of being observed on persistence at an insoluble task. , 1981 .