Prostate whole-mount histology reconstruction and registration to MRI for correlating in-vivo observations with biological findings

Multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (mMRI) is the standard exam for prostate cancer diagnosis, staging and risk assessment in current clinical routine. Correlating mMRI in-vivo observations with biological findings from radical prostatectomy specimen would improve the optimal therapy selection. Thus, we proposed a method for reconstructing and registering the prostate whole-mount histology (WMH) to the MRI, considering a thin slicing of the prostatectomy specimen. The method was evaluated on 3 patients, included in a prospective study, for which hematein-eosinsafran and immunohistochemistry stainings were performed. The registration error was assessed by measuring the Euclidean distance between landmarks, previously identified by an expert on both mMRI and histological slices. The mean error was 4:90α1:34 mm. Our method demonstrated promising results for registering prostate WMH to in-vivo mMRI, thus allowing for spatial accurate correlation between radiologic observations and biological information.

[1]  P. Taylor,et al.  A systematic review of computer-assisted diagnosis in diagnostic cancer imaging. , 2012, European journal of radiology.

[2]  Anant Madabhushi,et al.  Determining histology-MRI slice correspondences for defining MRI-based disease signatures of prostate cancer , 2011, Comput. Medical Imaging Graph..

[3]  Stephan E Maier,et al.  Multiparametric MRI of prostate cancer: An update on state‐of‐the‐art techniques and their performance in detecting and localizing prostate cancer , 2013, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[4]  Clare Allen,et al.  How good is MRI at detecting and characterising cancer within the prostate? , 2006, European urology.

[5]  A. Horwich,et al.  Prostate cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. , 2010, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[6]  Hyunjin Park,et al.  Registration methodology for histological sections and in vivo imaging of human prostate. , 2008, Academic radiology.

[7]  D. Shen,et al.  Registering histological and MR images of prostate for image-based cancer detection. , 2007, Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention : MICCAI ... International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention.

[8]  C Cummings,et al.  Processing of radical prostatectomy specimens for correlation of data from histopathological, molecular biological, and radiological studies: a new whole organ technique , 2005, Journal of Clinical Pathology.

[9]  J. Fütterer,et al.  ESUR prostate MR guidelines 2012 , 2012, European Radiology.

[10]  Jonathan I. Epstein,et al.  Recommendations for the reporting of prostate carcinoma , 2007, Virchows Archiv.

[11]  Anant Madabhushi,et al.  Multi-attribute combined mutual information (MACMI): An image registration framework for leveraging multiple data channels , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro.

[12]  Cary Siegel,et al.  Prostate magnetic resonance imaging: challenges of implementation. , 2015, Current problems in diagnostic radiology.

[13]  Choon Hua Thng,et al.  Optimum slicing of radical prostatectomy specimens for correlation between histopathology and medical images , 2010, International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery.

[14]  R. Lenkinski,et al.  Elastic registration of multimodal prostate MRI and histology via multiattribute combined mutual information. , 2011, Medical physics.

[15]  P. Danielsson Euclidean distance mapping , 1980 .

[16]  Rémy Prost,et al.  Robust Alignment of Prostate Histology Slices With Quantified Accuracy , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[17]  Ashish Chandra,et al.  A Workflow to Improve the Alignment of Prostate Imaging with Whole-mount Histopathology. , 2014, Academic radiology.

[18]  Jiani Hu,et al.  Feasibility and preliminary experience of quantitative T2* mapping at 3.0 T for detection and assessment of aggressiveness of prostate cancer. , 2014, Academic radiology.

[19]  Nikos Paragios,et al.  DRAMMS: Deformable Registration via Attribute Matching and Mutual-Saliency Weighting , 2009, IPMI.

[20]  T. D. de Reijke,et al.  Prostate cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. , 2010, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.