Interplay of the tip–sample junction stability and image contrast reversal on a Cu(111) surface revealed by the 3D force field

Non-contact atomic force microscopy is used to measure the 3D force field on a dense-packed Cu(111) surface. An unexpected image contrast reversal is observed as the tip is moved towards the surface, with atoms appearing first as bright spots, whereas hollow and bridge sites turn bright at smaller tip-sample distances. Computer modeling is used to elucidate the nature of the image contrast. We find that the contrast reversal is essentially a geometrical effect, which, unlike in gold, is observable in Cu due to an unusually large stability of the tip-sample junction over large distances.

[1]  E. Meyer,et al.  Dynamic force microscopy of copper surfaces : atomic resolution and distance dependence of tip-sample interaction and tunneling current , 2000 .

[2]  E. Altman,et al.  Three-dimensional imaging of short-range chemical forces with picometre resolution. , 2009, Nature nanotechnology.

[3]  Johannes Grotendorst,et al.  Modern methods and algorithms of quantum chemistry , 2000 .

[4]  C. J. Chen,et al.  Introduction to Scanning Tunneling Microscopy , 1993 .

[5]  T. Hashizume,et al.  STM of the Cu(111)1 × 1 surface and its exposure to chlorine and sulfur , 1993 .

[6]  Franz J. Giessibl,et al.  The Force Needed to Move an Atom on a Surface , 2008, Science.

[7]  Kiyoyuki Terakura,et al.  Surface-tip interactions in noncontact atomic-force microscopy on reactive surfaces: Si(111) , 1998 .

[8]  E. Meyer,et al.  Three-dimensional force spectroscopy of KBr(001) by tuning fork-based cryogenic noncontact atomic force microscopy , 2010 .

[9]  Peter Grutter,et al.  Adhesion interaction between atomically defined tip and sample , 1998 .

[10]  Burke,et al.  Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple. , 1996, Physical review letters.

[11]  Franz J. Giessibl,et al.  HIGH-SPEED FORCE SENSOR FOR FORCE MICROSCOPY AND PROFILOMETRY UTILIZING A QUARTZ TUNING FORK , 1998 .

[12]  J. Gimzewski,et al.  Tunneling characteristics at atomic resolution on close-packed metal surfaces , 1992 .

[13]  T. Uda,et al.  First-principles simulation of atomic force microscopy image formation on a GaAs(110) surface: Effect of tip morphology , 2001 .

[14]  G. Binnig,et al.  Tunneling through a controllable vacuum gap , 1982 .

[15]  M. Payne,et al.  ROLE OF COVALENT TIP-SURFACE INTERACTIONS IN NONCONTACT ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPY ON REACTIVE SURFACES , 1997 .

[16]  K. Terakura,et al.  Effect of tip morphology on image formation in noncontact atomic force microscopy: InP(110) , 2001 .

[17]  Brune,et al.  Atomic-resolution imaging of close-packed metal surfaces by scanning tunneling microscopy. , 1989, Physical review letters.

[18]  Miller,et al.  High-resolution imaging of a dislocation on Cu(111). , 1990, Physical review letters.

[19]  Ivan Stich,et al.  Nanomanipulation using only mechanical energy. , 2005, Physical review letters.

[20]  P. Jelínek,et al.  Mechanism for room-temperature single-atom lateral manipulations on semiconductors using dynamic force microscopy. , 2007, Physical review letters.

[21]  Masayuki Abe,et al.  Chemical identification of individual surface atoms by atomic force microscopy , 2007, Nature.

[22]  C. Lutz,et al.  Interplay of conductance, force, and structural change in metallic point contacts. , 2011, Physical review letters.

[23]  John E. Sader,et al.  Accurate formulas for interaction force and energy in frequency modulation force spectroscopy , 2004 .

[24]  Franz J. Giessibl,et al.  Atomic resolution on Si(111)-(7×7) by noncontact atomic force microscopy with a force sensor based on a quartz tuning fork , 2000 .

[25]  Computer simuations for the nano-scale , 2007 .

[26]  Werner A. Hofer,et al.  The role of surface elasticity in giant corrugations observed by scanning tunneling microscopes , 2004 .

[27]  Peter Liljeroth,et al.  Amplifying the Pacific Climate System Response to a Small 11-Year Solar Cycle Forcing , 2009, Science.

[28]  P. Jelínek,et al.  First-principles simulations of STM images: From tunneling to the contact regime , 2004 .

[29]  T. König,et al.  Atomic resolution on a metal single crystal with dynamic force microscopy , 2009 .

[30]  Covalent and reversible short-range electrostatic imaging in noncontact atomic force microscopy. , 2003, Physical review letters.

[31]  L. Kantorovich,et al.  Toggling bistable atoms via mechanical switching of bond angle. , 2011, Physical review letters.

[32]  D. Vanderbilt,et al.  Soft self-consistent pseudopotentials in a generalized eigenvalue formalism. , 1990, Physical review. B, Condensed matter.

[33]  A. Shluger,et al.  Unambiguous interpretation of atomically resolved force microscopy images of an insulator. , 2001, Physical review letters.

[34]  Wilson,et al.  Observation of atomic corrugation on Au(111) by scanning tunneling microscopy. , 1987, Physical review letters.

[35]  F. Giessibl,et al.  Phantom force induced by tunneling current: a characterization on Si(111). , 2011, Physical review letters.

[36]  E. Meyer,et al.  Atomic-scale mechanical properties of orientated C60 molecules revealed by noncontact atomic force microscopy. , 2011, ACS nano.

[37]  N. Moll,et al.  Organic structure determination using atomic-resolution scanning probe microscopy. , 2010, Nature chemistry.